Treehouse | Learn to code with us! engagement report
@treehouse - 124K followers on X
Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 124K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 900 times each, and 0.222% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.727% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5 interactions, about 2.5x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #28daysofbuild, #beginnerswhobuild, #nocodeai.
Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #28daysofbuild, #beginnerswhobuild, #nocodeai.
Compared with accounts its own size
Treehouse | Learn to code with us!'s engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 12% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.002%, Treehouse | Learn to code with us! sits below the 10th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 56% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 56% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 265 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Nov 3, 20252.5x their median
Ready to build real web apps—zero code required? 🚀 Dive into WeWeb with Treehouse and unlock the power of AI! Our FREE courses guide you step-by-step to create apps, automate workflows, and bring your designs to life. Fast. Fun. Limitless. #LearnToCode #AI #Treehouse https://t.co/gqwQyw5aIj
- Sep 22, 20252.5x their median
Step into cybersecurity with our college credit course. Perfect for beginners, or skip straight to the final exam! Earn 3 transferable credits. Ready to get started? Grab a free 7-day trial to start learning. https://t.co/8E7VuTn8yv https://t.co/nQXqCQASfn
- Sep 19, 20252.5x their median
🚦 This week has been your green light. $9/month. Just start and see what happens. https://t.co/1nk9TRNsHi #NationalCodingWeek #LearnToCode #Treehouse https://t.co/j6XX0x2yWN
- Aug 27, 20262.0x their median
Something big is coming to Treehouse: the AI Bootcamp. 28 days. Zero code. Any subscription level. More details soon! 👀 #28DaysOfBuild #BeginnersWhoBuild #NoCodeAI https://t.co/fdDIrWJaZB
- Jul 30, 20262.0x their median
¡Gran noticia! Todos los cursos de Treehouse ahora incluyen subtítulos en español. https://t.co/J2vHuICpEX
- May 28, 20262.0x their median
Ready to apply smarter? We've partnered with Hireward, a free AI-powered career platform that helps you check your match for any role, close skill gaps, and create application materials tailored to the job. Get started at https://t.co/DgO2gOULGW. https://t.co/8T8mYvJDms
- Sep 30, 20261.5x their median
The AI Bootcamp has launched! 🚀 Pick your product: build a web app, an AI agent, or a data dashboard. Or build all three. We give you the keys in the AI Bootcamp — free to all subscription levels. 🐸 #TreehouseAIBootcamp #28DaysOfBuild #BeginnersWhoBuild #NoCodeAI https://t.co/FZtiNmvahd
- Aug 31, 20261.5x their median
COMING IN SEPTEMBER 🚀 The AI Bootcamp program starts at ground zero. Total beginners encouraged. Join at any subscription level. Stay tuned for more! #28DaysOfBuild #BeginnersWhoBuild #NoCodeAI https://t.co/ggqkMbXJDd
- Apr 28, 20261.5x their median
Coming soon: the Treehouse AI Bootcamp. Learn practical, in-demand AI skills and earn a certificate you can share with confidence. More details soon! https://t.co/StTZrhnHPL
- Apr 21, 20261.5x their median
Want to build a WordPress website without writing code? This new beginner-friendly, 80-minute course walks you through the full process from setup to launch-ready design. Perfect for beginners getting started with WordPress, CMS tools, themes, plugins, and Elementor. https://t.co/JUINNJwpb3
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 124K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 900 times each, and 0.222% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.727% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5 interactions, about 2.5x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #28daysofbuild, #beginnerswhobuild, #nocodeai.
- What is Treehouse | Learn to code with us!'s engagement rate on X?
- Treehouse | Learn to code with us! (@treehouse) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 123,829 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.002%, Treehouse | Learn to code with us! sits below the 10th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @treehouse have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @treehouse post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.3 posts per day across the measured window.