Back to @tnadmszo's profile

μƒˆμ‚π’π€ππŸŒ±μ•„ν‹°λ¦½μ„Όν„° engagement report

@tnadmszo - 66K followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
2.29%
of 66K followers
Per impression
3.99%
38K views on a typical post
Reach
57.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
2.44%
922 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.73/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 66K followers, an engagement rate of 2.29%. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 3.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 57.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 7.3x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #μƒˆμ‚_λ“œλ‘œμž‰νŒ, #κΈΈν‹°μ±Œλ¦°μ§€, #μƒˆμ‚_μžμ£Όλ°›λŠ”_질문. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026. Recurring tags: #μƒˆμ‚_λ“œλ‘œμž‰νŒ, #κΈΈν‹°μ±Œλ¦°μ§€, #μƒˆμ‚_μžμ£Όλ°›λŠ”_질문.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 2.29%, μƒˆμ‚π’π€ππŸŒ±μ•„ν‹°λ¦½μ„Όν„° sits above the 75th percentile of the 151,176 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.6% to 2.29%.

p100.003%
p250.021%
p50 (median)0.126%
p750.6%
p902.29%
p9984.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 151,176 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 27,181 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.021%
50th percentile0.126%
75th percentile0.6%
90th percentile2.29%
99th percentile84.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 203 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 31, 20267.3x their median

    νŒ”κΏˆμΉ˜ 근처 μžμ£Όν•˜λŠ” μ‹€μˆ˜πŸ’ͺ 1. νŒ”κΏˆμΉ˜λΌˆλŠ” μ•„λž˜νŒ”μ— λΆ™μ—¬μ£Όμ„Έμš”. : νŒ”κΏˆμΉ˜λΌˆλŠ” μ•„λž˜νŒ”λΌˆ(자뼈)에 λΆ™μ–΄μžˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. μœ„νŒ”λΌˆ κ΄€μ ˆκ³Ό 삼두근 λ•Œλ¬Έμ—, νŒ” 라인은 νŒ”κΏˆμΉ˜κΉŒμ§€ 일자둜 λ–¨μ–΄μ§€μ§€ μ•ŠμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. μœ„νŒ”μ΄ μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ μ•„λž˜νŒ”μͺ½μ— νŒ”κΏˆμΉ˜λ₯Ό λΆ™μ—¬, 일자라인이 λ‚˜μ˜€κ²Œ ν•˜λ©΄ μ’‹μŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. 2. νŒ”κΏˆμΉ˜λŠ” λ‚΄ λͺΈμͺ½ νŒ”κΏˆμΉ˜κ°€ 더 νŠ€μ–΄λ‚˜μ™€ μžˆμ–΄μš”. : νŒ”κΏˆμΉ˜λŠ” μ‚Όκ°ν˜• λͺ¨μ–‘μ˜ 뼈둜 λ˜μ–΄ μžˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. 이 λΌˆλŠ” λ‚΄ λͺΈμͺ½μœΌλ‘œ(medial) 더 νŠ€μ–΄λ‚˜μ™€ μžˆλŠ” ν˜•νƒœμž…λ‹ˆλ‹€. 3. 반츑면 νŒ”μΌ 땐 νŒ”κΏˆμΉ˜ 그리면 μ•ˆλΌμš”. : νŒ”κΏˆμΉ˜λŠ” νŒ” 뒷면에 있기 λ•Œλ¬Έμ—, νŒ” μ•žλ©΄μ΄ 많이 보일 λ•Œ 그리면 μ•ˆλΌμš”. λ°˜μΈ‘λ©΄μΈλ°λ„ νŒ” λͺ¨μ„œλ¦¬κ°€ λŠκ»΄μ§€λŠ” κ²½μš°κ°€ μžˆλŠ”λ° 그건 νŒ”κΏˆμΉ˜λΌˆκ°€ μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ μœ„νŒ”λΌˆμ˜ κ΄€μ ˆ λͺ¨μ„œλ¦¬μž…λ‹ˆλ‹€. #μƒˆμ‚_λ“œλ‘œμž‰νŒ

    8.8K2.1K1139346K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.0x their median

    무릎 μžμ£Όν•˜λŠ” μ‹€μˆ˜: 1νƒ„μž…λ‹ˆλ‹€. 1. 무릎뼈λ₯Ό νŠ€μ–΄λ‚˜μ˜€κ²Œ κ·Έλ¦¬μ„Έμš”. : 포유λ₯˜λŠ” 무릎뼈λ₯Ό μ§€λ ›λŒ€μ˜ μ›λ¦¬λ‘œ μ΄μš©ν•΄ μ›€μ§μž…λ‹ˆλ‹€. 포유λ₯˜ 캐릭터λ₯Ό 그리고 μ‹Άλ‹€λ©΄ 무릎뼈λ₯Ό νŠ€μ–΄λ‚˜μ˜€κ²Œ κ·Έλ¦½μ‹œλ‹€. 2. 무릎 λ°©ν–₯κ³Ό 발 λ°©ν–₯을 μœ μ‚¬ν•˜κ²Œ κ·Έλ¦¬μ„Έμš”. : 무릎 λ°©ν–₯κ³Ό 발 λ°©ν–₯은 μœ μ‚¬ν•©λ‹ˆλ‹€. 닀리λ₯Ό 벌릴수둝 발이 쑰금 더 λ°”κΉ₯으둜(lateral) 벌릴 수 μžˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. 3. 무릎의 μ‚¬μ΄μ¦ˆλ₯Ό μΆ©λΆ„νžˆ κ·Έλ¦¬μ„Έμš”. : λ¬΄λ¦Žμ€ 무릎뼈+λŒ€ν‡΄κ³¨+μ •κ°•μ΄λΌˆλ‘œ 이루어진, κ΄€μ ˆμ„ 넣을 곡간이 ν•„μš”ν•©λ‹ˆλ‹€. κΈΈμ–΄μ Έμ„œ 2탄도 μ€€λΉ„ μ€‘μ΄μ—μš”! νˆ¬λΉ„μ»¨ν‹°λ‰΄πŸ˜Ž #μƒˆμ‚_λ“œλ‘œμž‰νŒ

    2.5K4461673K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 2020

    [닀리 라인] *무릎 μ˜†μ— 곡간이 μžˆμ–΄μš”* 무릎뼈 μ˜†μœΌλ‘œ μ§€λ‚˜κ°€λŠ” μΈλŒ€κ°€ μžˆμ–΄μš”. 닀리에 무릎뼈만 κ½‰μ°¨κ²Œ 그리지 μ•Šκ²Œ μ£Όμ˜ν•΄μ£Όμ„Έμš”! κ·Έμ™Έ λ‹€λ¦¬μ—μ„œ μ£Όμ˜ν•  아웃라인에 λŒ€ν•΄ μ΄λ―Έμ§€λ‘œ λ§Œλ“€μ—ˆμ–΄μš”. https://t.co/rDBklZnDj7

    1.1K42126View on X
  • Jul 18, 2026

    μˆ˜μ • μ „ ← β†’ μˆ˜μ • ν›„ ν•™μƒλΆ„μ˜ ν•΄λΆ€ν•™ 곡뢀λ₯Ό ν”Όλ“œλ°±λ“œλ ΈμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€! μžμ„Έν•œ λ‚΄μš©μ€ νƒ€λž˜λ‘œπŸ”½ https://t.co/G5y1CLbsjN

    6261192265K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    인체 잘 μΉ ν•˜λ €λ©΄? 인체의 싀루엣(2D) μ •λ³΄λ‘œλŠ” λ„μ €νžˆ μΉ ν•  수 μ—†μ–΄μš”. 잘 μΉ ν•˜λ €λ©΄ μ„  μ•ˆμ˜ λ‚΄λΆ€μ˜ ν˜•νƒœλ₯Ό 3D둜 이해해야 ν•©λ‹ˆλ‹€. μ΄λŠ” λ‹¨μˆœν•œ λ„ν˜•μœΌλ‘œ μ–΄λ–»κ²Œ μƒκ²ΌλŠ”μ§€(νˆ¬μ‹œμ™€ 전체적인 3Dν˜•νƒœ + ν‘œλ©΄μ˜ ꡴곑(κ·Έλ¦¬λ“œ, λΌˆμ™€ 근윑)으둜 ν‘œν˜„ν•΄μ•Ό ν•©λ‹ˆλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ λ„ν˜•ν™”μ™€ ν•΄λΆ€ν•™ λͺ¨λ‘λ₯Ό 곡뢀할 ν•„μš”κ°€ μžˆμ–΄μš”. #μƒˆμ‚_ν•΄λΆ€ν•™ #μƒˆμ‚_μ±„μƒ‰νŒ

    5931181122K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026

    μ»€λ―Έμ…˜ μž‘μ—… 방솑 https://t.co/fKJmfQAwGz https://t.co/NffT1PD8Kl

    39281116K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 2026

    #μƒˆμ‚μ˜μ—¬λ¦„μŠ€ν„°λ”” κ³Όμ œν•˜λŠ” 방법은 μ•„λž˜ 링크에 μ •λ¦¬ν•΄λ‘μ—ˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€!πŸ€— μŠ€ν„°λ”” μ°Έμ—¬ μ•ˆν•˜μ‹œλŠ” 뢄듀도 따라할 수 있게 λ§Œλ“€μ–΄λ‘μ—ˆμ–΄μš”~! https://t.co/YP14ST2U5A

    58270212K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    μš”μ¦˜ λ””μ— /메일을 톡해 μ»€λ―Έμ…˜/μž‘ν’ˆ μˆ˜μ§‘ 문의둜 μ‚¬κΈ°μΉ˜λŠ” 메일이 κ·Ήμ„±μ΄κ΅°μš”. 업체가 μ•„λ‹Œ λ””μ— /λ©”μΌμ˜ 경우 보닀 더 μ‹ μ€‘ν•œ κ³ λ €κ°€ ν•„μš”ν•œ λ•Œμž…λ‹ˆλ‹€. 평균보닀 큰 κΈˆμ•‘μ˜ 경우 특히 μ£Όμ˜ν•˜μ„Έμš”.

    116002.9K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 2026

    https://t.co/OGfRppns5E #μƒˆμ‚μ˜μ—¬λ¦„μŠ€ν„°λ”” 1μ£Όμ°¨ ν•΄λ‹΅κ³΅κ°œ 라이브~

    41204.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2026

    μš”μƒˆ μ œκ°€ μ΄μƒν•œ 루머(?)λ₯Ό λ“€μ—ˆλŠ”λ° μ˜¨λ¦¬μ „μ΄ λΆ€ν™œν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€λŠ” λ£¨λ¨Έμž…λ‹ˆλ‹€. μ œκ°€ μΌλŸ¬λ ˆκ°€ 된 μΈμƒμ˜ λͺ©ν‘œκ°€ μ˜¨λ¦¬μ „μ΄ λ§¨λ‚ μ²œλ‚  λ‚˜κ°€λŠ” 동인지 50ꢌ만 뽑아 λŒ€μΆ©νŒ”κ³  μ‚¬λΌμ§€λŠ” 이λͺ¨μ΄κΈ° λ•Œλ¬Έμ— ν•œ λͺ…μ˜ μΈμƒμ§„λ‘œκ°€ 달렸닀 μƒκ°ν•˜μ‹œκ³  이 루머가 사싀인지 μ•Œλ €μ£Όμ‹€ λΆ„

    60002.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#μƒˆμ‚_λ“œλ‘œμž‰νŒ#κΈΈν‹°μ±Œλ¦°μ§€#μƒˆμ‚_μžμ£Όλ°›λŠ”_질문#μƒˆμ‚_ν•΄λΆ€ν•™

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 66K followers, an engagement rate of 2.29%. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 3.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 57.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 7.3x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #μƒˆμ‚_λ“œλ‘œμž‰νŒ, #κΈΈν‹°μ±Œλ¦°μ§€, #μƒˆμ‚_μžμ£Όλ°›λŠ”_질문. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is μƒˆμ‚π’π€ππŸŒ±μ•„ν‹°λ¦½μ„Όν„°'s engagement rate on X?
μƒˆμ‚π’π€ππŸŒ±μ•„ν‹°λ¦½μ„Όν„° (@tnadmszo) has an engagement rate of 2.29%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 65,585 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 2.29%, μƒˆμ‚π’π€ππŸŒ±μ•„ν‹°λ¦½μ„Όν„° sits above the 75th percentile of the 151,176 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @tnadmszo have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @tnadmszo post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going