Back to @striver_79's profile

Striver | Building takeUforward engagement report

@striver_79 - 204K followers on X

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.089%
of 204K followers
Per impression
1.07%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
8.28%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
181
interactions (median)
Saved
0.036%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.93/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 181 interactions against 204K followers, an engagement rate of 0.089%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 52% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.5K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026. Recurring tag: #takeuforward.

Compared with accounts its own size

Striver | Building takeUforward's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 46% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.089%, Striver | Building takeUforward sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,055 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video52% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 52% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 256 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Dec 26, 201225x their median

    Thank you everyone. I will work hard and be the best I can.

    3.6K8368335View on X
  • Oct 15, 20254.4x their median

    Did my bit - Diwali new clothes for everyone - One child’s education for the year - One day special food for everyone If you’re earning well, please try sponsoring a child’s education. It’s one of the best ways to truly uplift someone. Posting this, as influencers can influence in different ways.

    1.8K4275991K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20268.7x their median

    The life you want will cost comfort.

    1.5K82211438K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20267.4x their median

    During COVID era, people switched jobs every few months for a better package. Times have changed. Today, salary is just one part of the decision. People care about job security, work culture, leadership, and increasingly - a company’s layoff history.

    1.3K1413040K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20267.0x their median

    How did we write so much code without AI. Crazy now when we think about it. Isn’t it?

    1.2K2935441K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20266.9x their median

    Ashneer Grover was clearly not happy with Rakhi Sawant’s behaviour.😮‍💨 Just got this from Reddit: when Rakhi Sawant was touching Ashneer, constantly mocking him, and making fun of his wife, he clearly didn’t like it. During the show, Ashneer confronted her, but that part was edited out. After that, Samay Raina told Rakhi not to touch Ashneer or make personal jokes about him. That’s why she stayed quiet in the second part of the show. First Ashish Solanki’s show, now here. Dear Ashneer, if you can’t take jokes on yourself, don’t come on a comedy show. 💯

    1.2K17303455K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20265.8x their median

    The internet will always make you feel poor, no matter how much you earn. If you seek public validation for everything, you will always be upset. There will always be someone making more than you. Cheer up. If your dreams are being ticked off one by one, regardless of pace, you are on the right path. Enjoy the process, add value, things will follow.

    9635723429K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20265.0x their median

    was ordering a rakhi gift for my sister, the payment failed, i marked "place order, will pay later" option that appeared after failure. Guess the user flow post it on @Swiggy @instamart_it Only the delivery person has the QR, there is no option to pay in the app, customer support doesn't have the QR/Link either. Terrible product flow tbh. When I select pay later, as an user am expecting an option in the app itself, add on to it, the address was selected as "friends and family", which makes it look more bad. Other E-comm app's have got the flow correct tbh.

    8701718190K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20264.6x their median

    🚨 3rd round of layoffs by Uber in 2026. This time, 3,300 employees (10% of its workforce) will be impacted. One of the most interesting observations: Manager headcount is being reduced by 20%, and a lot of managers will be asked to move to IC roles.

    77928193107K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20264.6x their median

    Most people want transformation without the boring middle.

    805176119K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#takeuforward

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 181 interactions against 204K followers, an engagement rate of 0.089%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 52% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.5K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.

What is Striver | Building takeUforward's engagement rate on X?
Striver | Building takeUforward (@striver_79) has an engagement rate of 0.089%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 203,625 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.089%, Striver | Building takeUforward sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @striver_79 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @striver_79 post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going