Back to @snkr_twitr's profile

SNKR_TWITR engagement report

@snkr_twitr - 645K followers on X

Measured over 87 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 645K followers
Per impression
0.019%
26K views on a typical post
Reach
4.05%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5
interactions (median)
Saved
0.004%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.5/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 645K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 87 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 0.019% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.05% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 87 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video and 99% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 56 interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

Measured over 87 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

SNKR_TWITR's engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 2% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, SNKR_TWITR sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,839 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,839 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,058 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video85% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link99% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 85% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 99% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 136 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 12, 202611x their median

    UPDATE to Password https://t.co/PonpepJKn3 https://t.co/P51UHvK1U6

    4826044K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20269.0x their median

    AD: Dropping 9/26 Jordan 1 Low OG 'Last Dance at the Garden' SNKRS US https://t.co/HAcoY90NS1 https://t.co/0UocofDdo5

    4031142K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20268.6x their median

    Victor Victor x Nike Air Force 1 '01 'University Red/White/Black' Raffle -> https://t.co/xHcuvuJEm9 https://t.co/Eh12yqjwfP

    17422038K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20268.6x their median

    Anyone copping the Disney Pixar Cars Lightning McQueen x Crocs Dinoco Crocband on 9/16? https://t.co/5NXeHbzgn6

    3544029K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20266.8x their median

    https://t.co/ksKiEy63bF

    2518021K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20266.4x their median

    AD: Sizes added at $33.75 each Nike Packable Cargo 7" Swim Shorts Finishline Grey https://t.co/1PTQKPoHlS Black https://t.co/AoYd3T5SSh JDsports Grey https://t.co/iJiNDrOWbX Black https://t.co/9cuF2NtKwG Use STATUS Rewards https://t.co/g8YQMWlj81

    2830128K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20265.2x their median

    LIVE in 15mins Victor Victor x Nike Air Force 1 '01 'University Red/White/Black' https://t.co/xHcuvuJEm9 https://t.co/ahzyLEIbQX

    1804445K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20264.6x their median

    AD: Get 40% off Drop-Front Shoe Storage Boxes via The Container Store 6pk https://t.co/Hu73K9V8zM Single https://t.co/DujCztZYY6 https://t.co/msMi7vN8W9

    1921130K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20264.6x their median

    AD: PRICE DROP at $145 Nike Air Max 95 Big Bubble 'Anthracite/Solar Red' Finishline https://t.co/0eHFe0qLCC Use code FNL15 JDsports https://t.co/P7IeERmVHy Use code JDS15 https://t.co/jF16M9ER9B

    2300028K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20264.2x their median

    AD: L/AB c/o Off-White™. COllection on @FreshRagsFL Shop -> https://t.co/fekJDIW3Rp https://t.co/M1N9uYOg2I

    2010031K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 645K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 87 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 0.019% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.05% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 87 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video and 99% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 56 interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

What is SNKR_TWITR's engagement rate on X?
SNKR_TWITR (@snkr_twitr) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 87 original posts from the last 30 days against 644,860 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, SNKR_TWITR sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,839 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @snkr_twitr have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @snkr_twitr post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going