Back to @orbs_network's profile

Orbs engagement report

@orbs_network - 161K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.014%
of 161K followers
Per impression
0.711%
3.1K views on a typical post
Reach
1.91%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
22
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.57/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.1K times each, and 0.711% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 126x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Orbs's engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.014%, Orbs sits above the 10th percentile of the 158,172 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 158,172 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,971 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video90% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link30% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 30% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 137 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 9, 2026126x their median

    https://t.co/K75kjaoX07

    1.9K395368147256K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 20264.8x their median

    We’re upgrading our perpetuals platform to run on a single, unified stack across all supported chains. V1 Perps will be deprecated on July 14, 2026, 12:00 UTC. Please close your open positions to the New Perps platform before this deadline. Opening or increasing positions on the Old Perps is now disabled; only closing positions and adding collateral are allowed.

    58261835.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20262.4x their median

    夏休み🏖Orbsクイズ✨1⃣ Orbs CBO(事業統括責任者)の名前は? ① Ran Hammer ② Ren Hammer ③ Ron Hammer ④ Run Hammer ヒントはリプへ。わかった人はコメントで答えを教えてね! 全6問、参加してくれた人に素敵なプレゼントを用意しているよ✨。締切は1週間後です🥰 https://t.co/T23y2NAp9Z

    2182312.8K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 20262.3x their median

    dSLTP is now live on @SushiSwap 🍣 Decentralized Stop-Loss and Take-Profit, fully on-chain and non custodial Now available on Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, and Katana https://t.co/COT2oRbUXJ https://t.co/2wKRUOZiu8

    344756.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20262.0x their median

    Orbs appoints @thehammer as CEO, with Nadav Shemesh transitioning to Executive Chairman Part of Orbs since 2017, Ran has led integrations across the protocol suite. His appointment builds on that leadership as Orbs enters its next chapter https://t.co/vEPjPKC7zH https://t.co/5no3zDQlyO

    352355.2K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20261.9x their median

    Meet Perpetual Hub Ultra 2.0 🌐 A fully in-house white-label perpetuals stack combining the UI, oracle, hedger, liquidator, smart contracts, and Orbs L3 Everything needed to launch perpetual futures under your own brand https://t.co/nBS7IytvYP https://t.co/rzuoGFY4M3

    315335.1K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 20261.9x their median

    Welcome @EnsoBuild to the Orbs stack! 🌐 Enso's routing engine is now integrated with Liquidity Hub, giving solvers access to unified liquidity across DeFi and traders better execution https://t.co/mnZKd0JIt5

    313433.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20261.7x their median

    collecting stamps, where's next? 👀 https://t.co/ddK6Md7dBy

    274523.6K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20261.7x their median

    The next chapter of Orbs' governance begins ⚖️ OIP-9 marks the beginning of the Orbs DAO, introducing the first formal governance layer and laying the foundation for progressive decentralization A major milestone in the evolution of the Orbs network https://t.co/2gQ0Px89bo https://t.co/pL8aL1p5Jp

    252645.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    Running an Orbs Guardian is now simpler than ever With the new AWS Marketplace deployment option, Guardians can launch and manage a node with a streamlined setup and far less infrastructure overhead Start here 👇 https://t.co/RpRkdE8Ppi https://t.co/DViouvJOZJ

    222244.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 161K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.1K times each, and 0.711% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 126x its own typical post.

What is Orbs's engagement rate on X?
Orbs (@orbs_network) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 161,430 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.014%, Orbs sits above the 10th percentile of the 158,172 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @orbs_network have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @orbs_network post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going