Back to @omoelerinjare1's profile

NOLLY engagement report

@omoelerinjare1 - 94K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.929%
of 94K followers
Per impression
1.21%
62K views on a typical post
Reach
77.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
748
interactions (median)
Saved
0.216%
134 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.47/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 748 interactions against 94K followers, an engagement rate of 0.929%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 62K times each, and 1.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 66.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.9K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

NOLLY's engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.929%, NOLLY sits above the 75th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.604% to 2.32%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,102 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,052 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 225 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 5, 202612x their median

    I don't know what started this but if he works there and there forcible grabbing him this is Physical harassment and a law suit it should be reported to the his supervisor first and if nothing happens then the lawyer https://t.co/tSJ6vnsrGR

    7.5K76956144283K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20268.0x their median

    This cop couldn't care less πŸ˜… https://t.co/E0sQCRHMaP

    4.9K42165835654K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20265.2x their median

    She went from yelling to crying REAL quick 🀣 https://t.co/7YGwnnbsJ8

    2.9K3904913965K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    Imagine walking down the street and suddenly seeing THIS happening in front of you. 😳 An elderly woman in China reportedly started threatening people while armed with two kitchen knives. When officers arrived, they didn’t simply rush toward her. They surrounded her with large shields while other officers used long poles to keep their distance and gradually bring the situation under control. It almost looks like a carefully coordinated operation. And for me, that’s what makes the video interesting. She was reportedly armed and clearly needed to be stopped, but the officers still appear focused on controlling the situation without immediately using deadly force. Stopping a dangerous person while keeping everyone alive should always be the best possible outcome. https://t.co/AS0e0dK4w2

    5798912017643K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    You gotta ask them what's the name on the warrant Guilty or not, the boy handled this perfectly and stayed calm. Hard to do, so good on him. He did not escalate the situation. I hope they were able to get the truth when they got to the station. https://t.co/PFPggMkSgb

    402166113959K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    AUDIBLY LAUGHING AT THE COP AS HES WALKING UP I KNEW BRO WAS GONNA BE FINE OFF RIP LOL HE KNEW HE WAS ALL LEGAL 🀝🀣🫑 https://t.co/PnHZhqKkRY

    5031549011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    CAREER CRIMINAL 😭😭😭😭 He was serving two sentences. He got on two different house arrested for two different things.πŸ˜‚πŸ˜­πŸ€·πŸ½β€β™€οΈ https://t.co/pTbVYlf2qU

    143136413.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    Cop didn't believe this man is handicap and mistreat him https://t.co/eqi0H6OycM

    134781343.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 748 interactions against 94K followers, an engagement rate of 0.929%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 62K times each, and 1.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 66.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.9K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

What is NOLLY's engagement rate on X?
NOLLY (@omoelerinjare1) has an engagement rate of 0.929%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 93,923 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.929%, NOLLY sits above the 75th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @omoelerinjare1 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @omoelerinjare1 post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going