Back to @myhiddenvalue's profile

Not A Number engagement report

@myhiddenvalue - 280K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.445%
of 280K followers
Per impression
9.15%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
4.86%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.358%
48 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.6/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 280K followers, an engagement rate of 0.445%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 9.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 18x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #breaking, #firetheliar.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026. Recurring tags: #breaking, #firetheliar.

Compared with accounts its own size

Not A Number's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 97% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.445%, Not A Number sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,752 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.128% to 0.604%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,752 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,056 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 100 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 19, 202618x their median

    Pfizer defends itself in court by saying, "We never said it was safe and effective." Moderna defends itself in court by saying, "We never said it was safe and effective." The only people that said it was safe and effective was the government and the media. https://t.co/U5sqbvR692

    13K7.7K688495321K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202612x their median

    https://t.co/XQ8nP5QLV5

    13K1.2K12238235K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202610x their median

    We are ruled over by absolute wankers. https://t.co/h98rEtLONh

    11K1.2K45357103K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20266.9x their median

    Same play-book different day 🔂. https://t.co/stOyDVF51o

    6.6K1.8K10649198K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20265.7x their median

    The deep state wrote their plan on stone for everyone to see but people still didn’t believe it That’s a clear sign you’ve been brainwashed https://t.co/P51QM3J7kI

    5.0K1.8K25297124K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20264.5x their median

    They must think they’re really clever https://t.co/skPlgJRAGN

    4.2K1.2K1505190K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20243.8x their median

    Organ transplants. They are taken while the donor is alive. "They give paralyzing agents when they take the organs, so that they don't move or squirm. Their heart rate goes up and their pressure goes up, which is the response to pain, but they can't demonstrate that they have pain." "They invented brain death, mainly to get organs. But also so they don't waste money treating people who aren't ever going to get a job." Dr Paul Byrne. Brain Death is a Lie. Source: https://t.co/1VHqi7E7Nb

    2.7K1.8K107176359K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.1x their median

    "Unvaccinated children are far, far healthier." Dr. Pierre Kory: "I would dismantle the whole vaccine apparatus." "They're destroying the health of our children, and our country... They're unnecessary. They're built on myths." "I am so angry for having been lied to for so long. The books that they write about vaccines are just false. They're false." "That whole vaccine myth needs to be taken down... People need to educate themselves on that, and I include all of the doctors." "We've been lied to around vaccines for so long."

    1.6K919614524K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20261.9x their median

    Common sense still matters. 🤷‍♀️ Ask questions. Check the evidence. Don’t outsource your critical thinking. https://t.co/MqxHLup3pb

    1.6K627191220K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    32-year-old Abdul Mohamed married 10-year-old Priya - now pregnant — after paying her father just $580. This barbaric child marriage is legal under Sharia law. Ban Islamists and deport them all Yes No https://t.co/NEGrTTYuWz

    9453983916868K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#breaking#firetheliar

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 280K followers, an engagement rate of 0.445%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 9.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 18x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #breaking, #firetheliar.

What is Not A Number's engagement rate on X?
Not A Number (@myhiddenvalue) has an engagement rate of 0.445%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 279,801 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.445%, Not A Number sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,752 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @myhiddenvalue have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @myhiddenvalue post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going