Mathew | Marketing @RH engagement report
@mathewg55 - 378K followers on X
Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 29 interactions against 378K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.8K times each, and 0.296% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 61x its own typical post.
Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Mathew | Marketing @RH's engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 18% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.008%, Mathew | Marketing @RH sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,148 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.127% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.3% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 44% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 11% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 44% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 451 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 5, 202661x their median
JUST IN: Robinhood Chain $HOOD 24H DEX volume hits $3.7 billion, marking a new all-time high. https://t.co/GqHzBk3N8Z
- May 26, 202618x their median
🚨 $50 GIVEAWAY TIME 🚨 Feeling lucky? 👀💸 To enter: ✅ Follow @unicorncmedia_ ✅ Like + Repost this tweet ✅ Tag a friend below 👇 ⏳ Ends in 48 hours Good luck everyone 🍀🔥 https://t.co/Wu78Jhd2oV
- Sep 6, 202616x their median
JUST IN: Robinhood Chain $HOOD assets are closing in on a combined market cap of $2,000,000,000 - Arbdata. https://t.co/94dHImOGy8
- Sep 15, 20265.6x their median
63 years ago today, four innocent young girls—Addie Mae Collins, Cynthia Wesley, Carole Robertson, and Denise McNair—were murdered by the KKK in the 16th Street Baptist Church bombing. As we remember this dark day in our nation’s history, may we honor their precious lives and continue to form a more perfect union every day.
- May 30, 20265.4x their median
💸 $40 COULD BE YOURS 💸 Why scroll when you could win? 👀 Follow @Carlo_Buonpane Like + Repost Tag a friend below ⏳ 48 hours only Winner gets $40 cash! 🍀 https://t.co/XOjM2f9oxX
- Jun 5, 20265.2x their median
Founders. Investors. Builders. Innovators. One yacht. One evening. Endless opportunities. 🚢 Join Ben X Capital at Dubai Harbour, meet the team behind $DC, and network with the people shaping the future of Web3. 🎟 https://t.co/0sF00X1bY6 @benxchain https://t.co/PvXNvoOf4c
- May 25, 20265.1x their median
Solana’s strongest meme narrative is here 🔥 @Pinbrettcoin The leveraged meme where bulls & bears both win. Live now on PinPet @PinPetDEX CA: 576UsusVaK67nPCDZTHm5bhRmd4gueEbYUByH5XfePet 👉https://t.co/g89KLo6kLX https://t.co/PFvGCdkHrg
- May 8, 20264.1x their median
Everyone notices a project after it runs. Few notice the infrastructure before it does. $DC brings: 🔱 Real utility 🔱 NFT use cases 🔱 DAO participation 🔱 Launchpad for builders and businesses Early discovery always looks uncertain at first. $DC | https://t.co/LPuX4D7wvp https://t.co/ndVChrnFk3
- Jun 28, 20264.0x their median
$EGL is gaining attention. Growing community, active team, and a clear RWA vision through logistics. Still early. CA: 0x07f18140a092c71f66db81feb01d26c93fd34444 Website: https://t.co/M1OuXPS5w0 Chart: https://t.co/c1fgPvl0Ub X: https://t.co/YQrysJs3PR Thoughts on $EGL? https://t.co/GATthhFCub
- May 1, 2026
$LUNADD LUNA DD = Moon + Due Diligence. - Fair launch - No pre-sale - AI buyback & burn - Active community Still under $10K mcap, very early. 4j5NN1CyR24ajbrVErDTg3z7pTUHKxP8iU4Zdkj5pump https://t.co/JI6CxwIXX6 https://t.co/o2gJ4P5VRK #Solana #LUNADD #Crypto https://t.co/zOvgbPLxAG
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 29 interactions against 378K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.8K times each, and 0.296% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 61x its own typical post.
- What is Mathew | Marketing @RH's engagement rate on X?
- Mathew | Marketing @RH (@mathewg55) has an engagement rate of 0.008%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 378,201 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.008%, Mathew | Marketing @RH sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,148 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @mathewg55 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @mathewg55 post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.2 posts per day across the measured window.