Back to @lubi366's profile

撸币养家 | lubiyangjia.eth engagement report

@lubi366 - 244K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.014%
of 244K followers
Per impression
0.388%
8.8K views on a typical post
Reach
3.59%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
34
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.8/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 34 interactions against 244K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.8K times each, and 0.388% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 166 interactions, about 4.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

撸币养家 | lubiyangjia.eth's engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 23% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.014%, 撸币养家 | lubiyangjia.eth sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,102 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,052 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video65% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link24% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 65% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 24% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 155 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 21, 20264.9x their median

    📮不用记助记词,也能拥有自托管钱包(TEE)! OKX Wallet 现已支持「社交登录」,用邮箱 / Apple / Google 账号登录,数秒即可创建: - 助记词由 TEE (可信执行环境)保管,OKX 永不接触 - 四端通用:App/插件/网页/Agent - 19 条链,Swap/跨链/限价/跟单/RWA 等,X Layer 还能免 Gas~ https://t.co/qYZsuwAwXR

    56697733K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20263.4x their median

    我们已经联合慢雾、OtterSec、Elliptic 发布 2026 Web3 安全与风控半年报! 两份报告,一个结论:攻击正从「代码」转向「人」,防线必须前移到设备、签名与协议层。 上半年 OKX 共拦截 570 万+笔高风险交易,链上情报库 11 亿+标签,覆盖 420+条链。把安全做在签名前,点击图片阅读报告 ⬇️

    5914311350K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20263.1x their median

    如果你在2011年买入10万块钱的比特币,最高价值多少钱? #BTC https://t.co/3kTn3HjYx0

    44159111K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20263.0x their median

    币安 SNDK 永续单日持仓量达 7.14 亿美元,总成交额达 64.7 亿美元 🤩标的每成交 5 美元,就有 1 美元发生在币安。 加密市场不只是在跟随价格,也开始参与价格的形成! https://t.co/7QQOHI78N4

    45349575K viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 20261.7x their median

    ⚡️OKX 闪赚 Lite 将在下周上线 ZAMA! 6月23日 15:00 至 6月27日 15:00(UTC+8),使用 ETH、OKB、ZAMA 申购,即可瓜分 6,250,000 枚 $ZAMA 奖励~ 参与方式:打开 APP 左上角 → 赚币与奖励 → 闪赚

    343501497K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.9x their median

    #币安钱包 插件现已支持助记词钱包🔧! 功能亮点: ✅ 支持导入已有助记词钱包 ✅ 支持在插件内快速创建新钱包 ✅ 助记词备份便捷,资产管理更安心 ⚠️插件端支持版本为 1.12.0 及以上。 升级钱包插件指引👉:https://t.co/crGWYIZuKu https://t.co/dvXx6YTgKz

    34558125K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20262.6x their median

    P 小将的链上战壕,再升级 🔥 OKX Wallet 首发支持 @Uniswap 全新发射平台 https://t.co/dXL1TpZH2q,热门板块同步上线。 从发现信号到完成交易,一路打通。 战壕已开,猎物自寻!

    332401548K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20262.5x their median

    OKX AI 黑客松大赛开启了,有点意思啊!目前第一名收益率还不错!虽然这条路很漫长,不过也是在这个业务上跑起来了! 相信未来有个不错的成果,加油OKX @okxchinese 交易大佬肯定是已经入驻了,开启了打榜模式! 第一名有10000刀的奖励🥇 比赛时间 报名期:7月31日 – 8月11日 12:00 (截止后不再接受报名) 比赛期:8月11日 12:00 – 8月25日 12:00,为期两周 ; 时区:全程以 UTC+8 为准 传送门:https://t.co/TSOvI9QBOv

    8176015K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20262.4x their median

    BG @Bitget_zh 开发效率还是蛮快 rToken 很快就上了可以作为抵押品,参与质押借币,打通了股币?币股?互通? 体验了下产品还不错,我日常一般没啥事也没做抵押,今天体验下来流程都很顺畅,多了一个渠道,👍谢谢33 @33Bitget 老板带我尝新! 当然也要注意这个利息的变化,还有质押率,风险等级特别要注意⚠️哦 温馨提示:仅供参考交流参考,不作为投资理财建议!

    1106909.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.3x their median

    🔥 参与 Robinhood 交易赛,瓜分 50,000 USDT 代币奖励 🎁 根据交易量排名,Top 800 可瓜分奖池 ⏰ 活动时间:9 月 7 日 4PM – 9 月 14 日 4PM (UTC+8) 立即参与 https://t.co/1u5BDalRj3 https://t.co/FrleXd3VLR

    161501170K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 34 interactions against 244K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.8K times each, and 0.388% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 166 interactions, about 4.9x its own typical post.

What is 撸币养家 | lubiyangjia.eth's engagement rate on X?
撸币养家 | lubiyangjia.eth (@lubi366) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 244,419 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.014%, 撸币养家 | lubiyangjia.eth sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @lubi366 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @lubi366 post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going