Back to @horizenglobal's profile

Horizen engagement report

@horizenglobal - 221K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.042%
of 221K followers
Per impression
1.30%
7.2K views on a typical post
Reach
3.23%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
93
interactions (median)
Saved
0.014%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.2/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 93 interactions against 221K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 15,823 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.2K times each, and 1.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 21% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Horizen's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,823 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 52% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.042%, Horizen sits above the 25th percentile of the 161,107 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.129%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.129%
p750.606%
p902.33%
p9982.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 161,107 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,821 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.129%
75th percentile0.606%
90th percentile2.33%
99th percentile82.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 309 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 202612x their median

    Horizen launching Season 2 of the Builder Ecosystem Fund 🚨⚡ 100K+ ZEN builder season to ship private onchain finance Up to $150K for RFP protocols & apps, plus smaller project funding opps - Tech stack: Bring-your-own-privacy integration - Vela (TEE) & zkVerify (ZK) preferred - Hands-on DevRel privacy build support for select projects - Funding to build, audit, and launch In partnership with @thriveprotocol Apply now 👇

    53452413312K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20268.6x their median

    Save the Date 🗓️ We've got a stacked Discord Community Call coming up next week! More details to come. Chat with you next week 🤝 https://t.co/zBva2RsTDI

    3144711718.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20268.6x their median

    as an EVM developer, you shouldn't need a new stack just to build privacy into your app. here's now @horizenglobal brings confidentiality closer to the tools you already use https://t.co/TgvdJb4q6q

    3144641468.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20267.6x their median

    Latam Dev Pipeline loading... Horizen x @crecimientoar dropping the Vela Acceleration Season ⚡ putting TEE privacy enclaves directly into the hands of fast-shipping builders. Come break our stack, build zero-leak DeFi or agent alpha, and bag those ecosystem grants . apply now! 🇦🇷👇 https://t.co/XJs1bP0q2o

    3653341119.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20261.8x their median

    Live intel drop tomorrow, Wed 19th @ 16:00 pm UTC | 12:00 pm EST🎙️ Three thesis-level topics on deck: • $ZEN staking mechanics, infra & ZENDEX • Dark-pool prediction markets w/ @layrslab • LATAM builder acceleration w/ @crecimientoar 📍 Stage link: https://t.co/ko6m6ShUoe Pull up for the alpha and set your reminders ⚡

    67984210K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026

    Ethereum now lists Base MCP as a developer resource, connecting AI agents to wallets on Base. Agent-to-chain infra matures fast. The missing piece stays private execution. Horizen builds that layer, keeping an agent's strategy off the public record. https://t.co/axcUAcs5Ij

    10218616.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    The EU's top court just ruled ungated bulk access to shareholder data breaches privacy law. Restricted access remains lawful. Days later, the SEC proposes putting ownership and wallet data permanently on public blockchains. Horizen resolves for regulatory-compliant privacy, by design.

    91161006.1K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 2026

    Vitalik just put zero-knowledge privacy on @ethereum's own roadmap. Institutions tracking his positioning now get a credible signal: private onchain finance arrives now. Horizen builds here. EVM-native, compliance-built-in, live on Base. https://t.co/OdNm8609Qd

    93101205.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026

    Optimism just mapped the tradeoff space for onchain privacy. Cost, compliance, usability, maturity. Fitting, as the Horizen runs on the OP Stack, through Base. We treat privacy as first-class: a core design problem solved at the application layer. https://t.co/XVY2qbp0lX

    891014112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    Reordering pending trades to stop front-running plays a clever game, but ignores a simple reality: Shuffling public order flow merely shifts how bots attack users. Kill the information asymmetry. Private DeFi on Horizen. Powered by $ZEN. https://t.co/m3A2ggjdEF

    95162112K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 93 interactions against 221K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 15,823 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.2K times each, and 1.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 21% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

What is Horizen's engagement rate on X?
Horizen (@horizenglobal) has an engagement rate of 0.042%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 220,627 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.042%, Horizen sits above the 25th percentile of the 161,107 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @horizenglobal have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,823 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @horizenglobal post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going