Back to @footballposts_x's profile

Unlimited Football ⚽ engagement report

@footballposts_x - 236K followers on X

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.014%
of 236K followers
Per impression
1.49%
2.1K views on a typical post
Reach
0.91%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
32
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.4/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 32 interactions against 236K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.1K times each, and 1.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.908% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.5K interactions, about 141x its own typical post.

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Unlimited Football ⚽'s engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 56% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.014%, Unlimited Football ⚽ sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,596 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,596 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,062 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 208 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 28, 2026141x their median

    Profit moves on Moon are crazy with $100K and 1000x leverage. https://t.co/etrTdtfxEw

    3.2K4537091154.0M viewsView on X
  • May 20, 2026125x their median

    Unbeatable Arsenal 2026 vs 3 peat madrid 2018 combined Xi. Any changes? https://t.co/0PjL9gkicg

    1.7K3259031.0K7.9M viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 202313x their median

    ⚽ 85' | 2-0 | Gol de Fermín López. #RealMadridOnTour

    2.3K2755051751.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202612x their median

    🚨🗣️ Scott McTominay has explained why so many Manchester United players appear to THRIVE after leaving Old Trafford… and believes the pressure at the club can make performances look worse than they actually are. 👀🔴 “I think it’s too easy of an excuse to say, ‘They left Manchester United and now they’re doing well.’ “In my last year, I did well, scored 10 goals and we won a trophy. “Marcus Rashford is a top player and has always been a top player; he’s one of the club legends. “Because the spotlight is directly on you at Manchester United, it can make things seem a lot worse. “When players leave and play more games, their confidence can increase, but they still have to earn those minutes.”

    185187012.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202612x their median

    Comparing Barcelona strongest squads in the last 3 decades: Any changes? https://t.co/zxQtE2kBzw

    2021145114.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202611x their median

    Most successful dribbles each year (2010- 2025) https://t.co/a2SmImNaxO

    1921114622.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202611x their median

    Barcelona vs Feyenoord. 🔵🔴🔥 Another Champions League night for Barça. Can they put on a show and start the campaign with a big win? 👀⚽️ https://t.co/wNzewUrznz

    17415621014K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202611x their median

    🤩🇫🇷 Zinedine Zidane on Michael Olise: “I love him, I absolutely love players like Olise. He’s talent, PURE talent”, told TF1. https://t.co/i0t8WqRVJR

    16817420965 viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202611x their median

    Last time, Spain conquered England 2-1 in the Euro 2024 final. 🇪🇸🔥 Today, La Roja are coming for an even bigger statement! Lamine Yamal to shine as Spain cruise to a 3-1 victory! https://t.co/RwtVC8Wm2L

    1641512506.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20269.8x their median

    Spain cruised to a 3-0 victory over Croatia last time. 🇪🇸🔥La Roma are ready to do it again! Lamine Yamal to find the net as Spain secure a convincing 2-0 win🏆🔴🟡 https://t.co/SghyqcwwaB

    1761013806.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 32 interactions against 236K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.1K times each, and 1.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.908% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.5K interactions, about 141x its own typical post.

What is Unlimited Football ⚽'s engagement rate on X?
Unlimited Football ⚽ (@footballposts_x) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 235,794 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.014%, Unlimited Football ⚽ sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,596 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @footballposts_x have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @footballposts_x post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going