Back to @food_porn's profile

Foodporn engagement report

@food_porn - 199K followers on X

Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 15, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.009%
of 199K followers
Per impression
0.281%
6.2K views on a typical post
Reach
3.17%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
18
interactions (median)
Saved
0.064%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.73/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 199K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 15,823 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.2K times each, and 0.281% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.6K interactions, about 311x its own typical post.

Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 15, 2026. Recurring tag: #foodporn.

Compared with accounts its own size

Foodporn's engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,823 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.009%, Foodporn sits above the 10th percentile of the 160,730 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.606%
p902.33%
p9982.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 160,730 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,800 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.606%
90th percentile2.33%
99th percentile82.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 153 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 2026311x their median

    Did you know how sardines are canned in Portugal? πŸŸπŸ‡΅πŸ‡ΉπŸ€·πŸ½β€β™‚οΈ https://t.co/h0qrPSqDG1

    5.1K3051021285.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026294x their median

    Catching durian from the tree tops looks like so much fun! 🀯πŸ«ͺ With ΰΈ‘ΰΈ­ΰΈͺ https://t.co/DKPyLE2wJY

    4.9K2715640294K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202663x their median

    What is he making… Friday edition! πŸ€·πŸ½β€β™‚οΈ Wrong answers only πŸ˜‚ https://t.co/Wga8FcdB4n

    895501788260K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202627x their median

    Have you ever had a New Mexican chile relleno?! πŸ”₯πŸ€·πŸ½β€β™‚οΈ @taoschef2021 shows us how he makes them! 🀯 https://t.co/4c4ZFkAvaJ

    4433215412K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202622x their median

    Do you know what he’s making? πŸ€·πŸ½β€β™‚οΈ With @muhammadelali764 https://t.co/XCJREhCNQy

    34917301213K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 202619x their median

    Do you know how instant ramen noodles are made? πŸœπŸ€·πŸ½β€β™‚οΈ https://t.co/zonBuhylG2

    297398039K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 202518x their median

    We get shown some real Food Porn as Chef Juan Carlos Garcia shows us how to perfectly cut an avocado πŸ₯‘πŸ”ͺ #foodporn #food https://t.co/qQlytj5w5x

    2902010159K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.5x their median

    I don’t know why I find this so satisfying πŸ«ͺπŸ™ƒ With @paulo.cesar0924 https://t.co/13SxRfMLPH

    422107.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.4x their median

    Is this pork crunchy enough for you? πŸ€·πŸ½β€β™‚οΈ With @porchettadalterio https://t.co/p8GfXnskpS

    392208.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20262.3x their median

    Have you ever had a banana split like this? πŸŒπŸ¦πŸ€·πŸ½β€β™‚οΈ https://t.co/dLRCjHZj19

    372217.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#foodporn

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 199K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 15,823 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.2K times each, and 0.281% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.6K interactions, about 311x its own typical post.

What is Foodporn's engagement rate on X?
Foodporn (@food_porn) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 52 original posts from the last 30 days against 199,485 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.009%, Foodporn sits above the 10th percentile of the 160,730 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @food_porn have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,823 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @food_porn post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going