Friends of the Earth (Action) engagement report
@foe_us - 224K followers on X
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 224K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 635 times each, and 0.945% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.283% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 91% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.2K interactions, about 1540x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nationalvoterregistrationday, #voteready.
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026. Recurring tags: #nationalvoterregistrationday, #voteready.
Compared with accounts its own size
Friends of the Earth (Action)'s engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.003%, Friends of the Earth (Action) sits below the 10th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 27% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 91% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 27% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 91% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 235 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 13, 20261540x their median
Trump announces that he is terminating 3 million acres of national monuments, opening them up to drilling, mining, and industrial development. https://t.co/2kq6KXqjDK
- Aug 10, 20265.5x their median
"The Trump administration is relentless in its war on offshore wind. Billions of taxpayers’ dollars have gone to waste along with tens of thousands of lost potential jobs." @commondreams https://t.co/KOKLjXeFnd
- Aug 5, 20265.0x their median
.@SenateAg Committee is about to vote on the Farm Bill & there's growing pressure to add provisions like the Save Our Bacon Act While framed as targeting state laws that prohibit cruel animal confinement practices, it also threatens state laws protecting food safety & consumers https://t.co/lU4gw6jzGE
- Sep 1, 20264.7x their median
Legal Personhood is a legal theory that grants natural features, such as forests, ecosystems, and rivers, legal rights and standing in court like those afforded to people. Learn how this could be used to protect rivers and oceans around the world. https://t.co/8gYm88IyZ3
- Aug 27, 20264.7x their median
Trump's donor just got $900 million of our tax dollars in his latest scheme to cancel offshore wind projects & boost fossil fuels “Even by MAGA standards, this seems exceptionally dodgy.” https://t.co/dZwIvOoubU
- Jul 22, 20264.0x their median
23,000+ consumers are calling on @GeneralMills & other major food companies to reject newly approved GMO wheat before it enters the food supply Companies have an opportunity to keep it out of breads, cereals, and pasta before commercialization begins https://t.co/idGYfok08W
- Aug 6, 20263.7x their median
.@SenBooker introduced a Farm Bill amendment to guarantee Americans’ right to sue pesticide manufacturers when their products cause harm — and Republicans on the Senate Ag Committee just shot it down. https://t.co/lNaPMuUTJe
- Sep 1, 20263.3x their median
HR 9436 would delay protections for the critically endangered North Atlantic right whale by seven additional years, shielding northeast commercial fisheries from new restrictions at the expense of these whales. Members of Congress must oppose H.R. 9436 https://t.co/fxkjYNNCsN
- Aug 6, 20263.3x their median
Earlier this year, SCOTUS ruled in favor of Bayer, limiting people’s ability to sue pesticide corporations for failing to warn them of cancer & other health harms linked to their products Luckily, @SenBooker is taking action this week to reverse this decision and restore justice https://t.co/bcrK3kzR16
- Jul 22, 20263.2x their median
The Trump administration’s blatant disregard of bedrock environmental laws puts rivers, streams and wetlands at risk of serious contamination. So we're taking them to court. https://t.co/Mx33ZbvfOl
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 224K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 635 times each, and 0.945% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.283% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 91% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.2K interactions, about 1540x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nationalvoterregistrationday, #voteready.
- What is Friends of the Earth (Action)'s engagement rate on X?
- Friends of the Earth (Action) (@foe_us) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 224,064 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.003%, Friends of the Earth (Action) sits below the 10th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @foe_us have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @foe_us post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.