Back to @focodereality's profile

Foco engagement report

@focodereality - 101K followers on X

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.234%
of 101K followers
Per impression
1.68%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
14.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
235
interactions (median)
Saved
0.136%
19 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.67/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 235 interactions against 101K followers, an engagement rate of 0.234%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 16,126 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 1.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 61K interactions, about 261x its own typical post.

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026. Recurring tag: #lucyramos.

Compared with accounts its own size

Foco's engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (16,126 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 55% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.234%, Foco sits above the 50th percentile of the 161,966 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.129% to 0.607%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.129%
p750.607%
p902.34%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 161,966 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,916 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.129%
75th percentile0.607%
90th percentile2.34%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video89% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link4% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 89% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 154 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 17, 2026261x their median

    Pelas fotos da pra ver o exato momento em que ela parou de sofrer bullying e se tornou a menina mais popular da escola https://t.co/jD8PsbZqig

    60K70517813824M viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 2026250x their median

    O pedido de casamento já tava sendo lindo, mas eu não tava esperando que a outra também tinha preparado isso https://t.co/jTMNkabp90

    56K2.4K1657097.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026103x their median

    É impossível assistir esse vídeo e não admirar toda a dedicação por trás dessa transformação. https://t.co/AAUtXg3ljU

    23K660149632.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202664x their median

    Acho que esse é um dos piores antes e depois que eu já vi na vida https://t.co/wapBOCunP1

    13K3341.2K64015M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202621x their median

    Foi fazer rinoplastia para resolver um problema; agora precisa de uma outra cirugia. https://t.co/5KWggazob0

    4.7K88215283.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202617x their median

    Como Vini Jr e Haaland seriam se um fosse com a aparência do outro!✨️ https://t.co/uJ3r8YLmKd

    3.6K140264621.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202616x their median

    era assim que os jovens nos EUA celebravam a conclusão do ensino médio em uma noite de baile de formatura https://t.co/7Hp5pwViL4

    3.6K16439635.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202615x their median

    No começo parece só uma história de família até você perceber o que aconteceu https://t.co/THKIik6m9b

    3.5K7794111.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202614x their median

    Opinião impopular: homem com o peito peludo não fica bem de barba. É muita informação visual e acaba virando cosplay de lobisomem Esse vídeo é a prova viva de que se você tem pelo no corpo, tire a barba. Isso salvou totalmente o visual dele, fora que rejuvenesceu uns 10 anos https://t.co/mSqPXEWKuH

    3.0K15413073529K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202611x their median

    Eu to até agora sem acreditar que ela tem apenas 38 anos https://t.co/m9kDiudU2P

    2.3K7716127392K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#lucyramos

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 235 interactions against 101K followers, an engagement rate of 0.234%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 16,126 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 1.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 61K interactions, about 261x its own typical post.

What is Foco's engagement rate on X?
Foco (@focodereality) has an engagement rate of 0.234%, based on the median interactions across 45 original posts from the last 30 days against 100,885 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.234%, Foco sits above the 50th percentile of the 161,966 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @focodereality have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (16,126 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @focodereality post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going