Back to @dikerdale's profile

dike engagement report

@dikerdale - 439K followers on X

Measured over 119 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.012%
of 439K followers
Per impression
0.944%
5.5K views on a typical post
Reach
1.28%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
52
interactions (median)
Saved
0.036%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
8.07/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 52 interactions against 439K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 119 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 14,930 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.5K times each, and 0.944% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 119 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video and 97% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 37x its own typical post.

Measured over 119 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

dike's engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (14,930 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.012%, dike sits above the 10th percentile of the 151,431 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.021%.

p100.003%
p250.021%
p50 (median)0.126%
p750.6%
p902.30%
p9984.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 151,431 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 27,197 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.021%
50th percentile0.126%
75th percentile0.6%
90th percentile2.30%
99th percentile84.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video84% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link1% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 84% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 1% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 159 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 5, 202637x their median

    Wanna cook with me? Join my TG 🫡⤵️ https://t.co/Bz8RWGZvES https://t.co/LaNDXwOs71

    784537604473K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 202624x their median

    My FOMO account is now public I will be depositing $500 into it, and I will speedrun it into over $1,000,000. Just like I did on phantom, but now on FOMO, EVERY TRADE WILL BE PUBLIC AND DOCUMENTED. You guys will be able to see the process behind the craft.. Follow me on FOMO, lock in with me 🫡

    7562182583170K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202618x their median

    70x on $AGRIPPA and we’re just getting started. Look at the calls from the past few weeks/months: I called $ANSEM → it did $450M I called $JIMOTHY → it did $45M I called $PIPEDOG → it did $60M I called $CASHCAT → it did $230M I called $STONK → it did $340M How many times are you going to fade me? The next one is already loading… When I drop the CA, don’t be the person asking for it after the move starts. NOTIS ON 🔔 LOCK IN.

    35227030207.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202617x their median

    $1,109 turned into over $811,400 off $MEME. Gave you all the perfect entries and plays. Some of the biggest gains come from simply finding the right entry and having the conviction to hold. Over a 740x for myself and everyone who listened to me. WE COOK SOON! https://t.co/15UD1MLBKW

    347237282319K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202616x their median

    $223,900 on $MUSEBOOK Called this one early in my Telegram and the community absolutely COOKED. Members were walking away with 6-figure PNLs while everyone else was fading. Keep fading me or start paying attention. Your choice. Next target: 7-figure PNLs for the Telegram crew. 🫡

    32123727408.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202615x their median

    Closed my $CTO trade today. Turned an initial $781 into over $116,000 That’s a 150X. Absolutely insane. And this is exactly why I keep saying you don’t need a huge bag to make serious money in crypto. You could’ve started with $100 or less and still caught a life-changing move if you were positioned early. Are you ready for my next call? 👀 Dropping another one soon. Follow me with NOTIS ON 🔔

    344194244113K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202613x their median

    POV: You took that risky trade https://t.co/kwdidcAFUp

    5854431436K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202613x their median

    I still can’t believe it… $CASHCAT made me over $350K in profit The pattern is always the same: stay focused, put in the work, and the money follows LOCK TF IN BOYS https://t.co/VTmiblYI2O

    275175212110K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20268.0x their median

    NEVER STOP CLICKING. https://t.co/GH7vxgRhEV

    3473430312K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20267.6x their median

    You’re going to be the first millionaire in your family. Claim it. https://t.co/yozI2FmL0D

    343153907.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 52 interactions against 439K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 119 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 14,930 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.5K times each, and 0.944% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 119 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video and 97% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.9K interactions, about 37x its own typical post.

What is dike's engagement rate on X?
dike (@dikerdale) has an engagement rate of 0.012%, based on the median interactions across 119 original posts from the last 30 days against 438,647 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.012%, dike sits above the 10th percentile of the 151,431 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @dikerdale have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (14,930 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @dikerdale post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 8.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going