Back to @culturaliteral1's profile

Cultura Literal engagement report

@culturaliteral1 - 1.7M followers on X

Measured over 108 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.005%
of 1.7M followers
Per impression
0.161%
52K views on a typical post
Reach
3.12%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
84
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
8.23/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 84 interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 108 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 52K times each, and 0.161% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 108 posts sampled, 19% carry an image or video and 69% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 49K interactions, about 580x its own typical post.

Measured over 108 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Cultura Literal's engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 13% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.005%, Cultura Literal sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,055 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video19% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link1% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 19% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 1% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 249 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 11, 2026580x their median

    Hoy, mientras desayunaba se me cruzó esto. Lo leí detenidamente y me eché a llorar. Aquí todos lloramos, ¿ok? https://t.co/QG1UUWrBkA

    43K5.1K341131396K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026317x their median

    Hoy en el metro. Un tío ve a una mujer con pañuelo en la cabeza y le suelta que se lo quite, que está en España. Ella ni se inmuta. Lo mira y responde: — Tengo cáncer, gilipollas Se hizo un silencio en todo el vagón. ¿Me levanto y aplaudo?

    24K2.0K31433395K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 2026287x their median

    لو الطيارة جذي …تسافرون؟ https://t.co/hY0i2bnjVD

    16K7664.9K2.2K12M viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026230x their median

    Estamos literalmente en la parte del película donde los científicos están tratando de advertir a todos y nadie los escucha

    16K2.9K7169185K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026178x their median

    La hora de cenar en España debería estudiarse. 🇩🇪 En Alemania: * Son las 18:00. * Cenas. * A las 19:00 ya has fregado. * Fin. 🇪🇸 En España:

    14K24251511612M viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026147x their median

    Quién inventó estos envases? O cuál es la función de esas ranuritas en las que se queda todo el contenido del envase? 😒🫠 https://t.co/ZTyDQW8RVu

    12K174307532.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 2026146x their median

    https://t.co/75f3S8GvYL

    9.2K3.0K3678199K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026103x their median

    Cuando era adolescente vi por primera vez el capítulo de Los Simpson de Frank Grimes. Me pareció un personaje hinchado, casi un chiste: un tío honesto y currante que se da de bruces contra Homer y no entiende nada. Años después el capítulo dejó de hacerme gracia. Empezó a darme mal cuerpo. Grimes no era una persona random.

    7.7K580256711.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202699x their median

    Hoy estaba hablando con un amigo Chino sobre el monte Everest y, cuando dije ese nombre, se molestó. Me explicó que para él, los Chinos, para muchos Tibetanos y Nepalíes, ese nombre tiene tintes de colonialismo científico, porque implica una historia que yo y mucha gente de este lado del mundo desconoce: el borrado de los nombres que ya existían para esa montaña. La verdad, me dio curiosidad y me puse a investigar... 🧐

    7.3K782179611.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202685x their median

    https://t.co/niKsluaOdU

    5.5K1.6K728110K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 84 interactions against 1.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 108 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 52K times each, and 0.161% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 108 posts sampled, 19% carry an image or video and 69% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 49K interactions, about 580x its own typical post.

What is Cultura Literal's engagement rate on X?
Cultura Literal (@culturaliteral1) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 108 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,659,950 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.005%, Cultura Literal sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @culturaliteral1 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @culturaliteral1 post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 8.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going