Jeztoshi engagement report
@cryptojezuz - 213K followers on X
Measured over 74 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 213K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 74 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 15,823 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 699 times each, and 0.286% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.328% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 74 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 238 interactions, about 119x its own typical post.
Measured over 74 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Jeztoshi's engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,823 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.001%, Jeztoshi sits below the 10th percentile of the 161,001 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.129% |
| 75th percentile | 0.606% |
| 90th percentile | 2.33% |
| 99th percentile | 82.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 97% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 9% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 533 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 11, 2026119x their median
PoorGoat turned $CATE into a community takeover after the crash and put his wallet on the timeline. The entire bag is visible. No anon dev dropping vague updates. No team allocation that could dump on the next green candle. CATE is sitting at $50.62M with $13.47M in daily volume. Most fair-launch cats from https://t.co/Ly6v1R4sCr got flushed to zero or absorbed by rugs. This one survived because someone stepped in when it mattered and said the quiet part out loud: send a random internet cat to billions.
- Sep 12, 202665x their median
Large wallet just moved 180M MANYU tokens off exchange in a single sweep. That's roughly $850k at current price. The flow direction matters more than the size. Exchange withdrawals of that magnitude usually signal one of two things: either a whale is moving to cold storage because they're done trading the range, or they're prepping liquidity for an OTC block that doesn't want slippage. Either way, tokens leaving centralized venues reduce available supply when the next bid wave shows up. WOJAK saw similar movement two weeks before its Binance US listing got loud. Not saying MANYU is next in line, but the pattern is worth watching. Sub-$5M Ethereum dog memes don't get that kind of size pulled off exchange unless someone knows something or expects the entry window to close soon. 🐳
- Oct 2, 202658x their median
Most Solana memes that cleared Binance review in the last cycle sat between $40M and $60M when the filing window opened. $TROLL at $47.72M is inside that band with the one thing no other token could engineer: fifteen years of cultural recognition that predates crypto entirely. The troll face didn't need a launch announcement. It was already distributed across every meme format that mattered long before someone wrapped it in a Solana contract. That's the type of brand moat exchanges actually bet on when they run compliance on a memecoin. #Crypto
- Sep 10, 202650x their median
Ethereum dog memes have one real edge over Solana and Robinhood: composability with actual infrastructure. $MANYU at $4.45M isn't just a sub-$5M dog coin with volume. It's on the chain where Uniswap, Aave, and every major DeFi primitive already lives. Solana dogs are faster and cheaper to trade, but they're isolated from the rest of the stack. Robinhood dogs have the retail rails and tokenized stock pairing, but the ecosystem is still thin. Ethereum dogs plug into liquidity aggregators, lending protocols, and bridges that have been battle-tested for years. That matters when you're trying to move size or compose strategies around a memecoin position. The play isn't that MANYU is the best dog meme. It's that when exchanges rotate back to dogs, the ones with real DeFi integration get the nod first. 🐕
- Oct 3, 202647x their median
The wojak face is permanent internet infrastructure. It survived every cycle because it was never tied to one. $WOJAK at $18.59M with a Binance US listing already live means it cleared the compliance filter most OG memes never pass. The global desk hasn't confirmed yet, but the token's already proven it can sit on a regulated exchange. Meanwhile the face itself sits in group chats, meme templates, and reply threads that predate half the tokens trading above it. The upside isn't a new narrative. It's that the brand doesn't expire when the meta rotates.
- Sep 12, 202638x their median
Solana's dog coins had their seasons. Cats are the rotation nobody priced. $CATE sitting at $41.20M, down from the summer hype but still moving $3.58M in volume. The internet was always getting around to cats. 🐱 https://t.co/yhZi7evbLm
- Oct 3, 202637x their median
$WOJAK holders who stayed through compliance review and Binance US clearing now sit at $18.97M while the timeline chases the next dog launch. https://t.co/vzXCqSi1lc
- Sep 12, 202634x their median
Ethereum dog memes don't need to outpace Solana on speed or match Robinhood on retail rails. They just need to be the ones still plugged into the actual financial layer when the next rotation starts. $MANYU at $4.74M sits inside an ecosystem where every major DeFi primitive already exists. Uniswap for liquidity routing. Aave for collateral loops. Bridges that move real size without breaking. The composability isn't theoretical. It's live infrastructure that's been stress-tested through multiple cycles. Solana dogs trade faster and cheaper, but they're isolated from the rest of the stack. Robinhood dogs have tokenized stock pairing and direct retail onramps, but the chain tooling is still thin. The edge isn't that MANYU is a better meme. It's that when exchange desks and aggregators rotate back to dog coins, the ones with native DeFi integration get prioritized first. Not because they're loved. Because they're already wired into the pipes that institutions and power users actually run size through. 🐕
- Oct 2, 202631x their median
$WOJAK at $18.72M after a Binance US listing that already cleared compliance is a different setup than the Solana casino rotation. The wojak face doesn't need a narrative deck. It's embedded across internet culture that predates half the tokens people call OG. The global Binance listing isn't confirmed, but the US approval already proved the token can pass institutional review. That filter kept PEPE and SHIB off regulated desks for years. The wallets still holding here aren't speculating on meme momentum. They're positioned on a brand that survived because it doesn't need to justify itself to anyone who's been online longer than this cycle.
- Oct 3, 202612x their median
$MARSCOIN cleared Alpha, Futures, and Spot on Binance. Next stop is a billion dollar market cap. https://t.co/4mNqfja68u
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 213K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 74 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 15,823 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 699 times each, and 0.286% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.328% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 74 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 238 interactions, about 119x its own typical post.
- What is Jeztoshi's engagement rate on X?
- Jeztoshi (@cryptojezuz) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 74 original posts from the last 30 days against 213,278 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.001%, Jeztoshi sits below the 10th percentile of the 161,001 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @cryptojezuz have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,823 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @cryptojezuz post?
- Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.73 posts per day across the measured window.