加密无畏 engagement report
@cryptobraveHQ - 206K followers on X
Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 14, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 88 interactions against 206K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 14,930 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.582% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 604 interactions, about 6.9x its own typical post.
Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 14, 2026. Recurring tag: #memestocks.
Compared with accounts its own size
加密无畏's engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (14,930 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.043%, 加密无畏 sits above the 25th percentile of the 151,319 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.021% to 0.126%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.021% |
| 50th percentile | 0.126% |
| 75th percentile | 0.6% |
| 90th percentile | 2.30% |
| 99th percentile | 84.3% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 79% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 21% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 79% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 21% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 348 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 21, 20266.9x their median
Fortune has secured over $4M in funding！ Backed by: @tbvxyz @CogitentV @X21_Digital @CGVFOF @K24Ventures @LandScape_Hold @mhventures @Maple_block @NewTribeCap @BasicsCapital @EverwoodCapital With strategic support from @NOX_Ventures. Fortune is building an AI-powered prediction derivatives hub that connects prediction-market liquidity with intelligent trading infrastructure. Through its Prediction Liquidity Hub, Prediction Derivatives and Fortune AI Agents, Fortune brings unified market access, real-time intelligence, opportunity discovery and smarter execution into one ecosystem. Building the intelligent infrastructure for the next era of prediction markets. 🥠
- Aug 21, 20264.5x their median
按头我做 Lighter 的大佬，现在又按头让我冲 @entropyIO ！ 我一搜，好几个熟人在做。。。 属于Hyperliquid 新 HIP-3 ，刚上线，团队全是斯坦福辍学 + Jump/Jane Street/Polymarket 顶级交易背景，主打 Pre-IPO + 股票永续，目前人极少、交易对还少，超级早期坑位。要做就做sndk和anth，真实交易去~ 据说很牛逼，据说很早期 我的链接：https://t.co/l7Gm0vBGZ4
- Aug 31, 20263.6x their median
重生之 ：我在纳斯达克重头创业 —— 一个"不务正业"的上市公司CEO自白 外人看Amber这几年，大概是逆袭的剧本： FTX暴雷时差点倒闭，活了下来；熬过23年大熊市，等来了牛市；完成了上市、去纳斯达克敲了钟。剧情完美。 但只有我自己知道，24、25这两年，是我创业九年里最煎熬的两年。 煎熬不是因为业务或行情，而是因为从24年起，我作为Amber的CEO，70%的时间、几乎100%的兴趣，都花在一件当时内部看起来"不务正业"的事情上：做AI agents——那会儿，甚至还没有agent这个说法。 24年，我作为Amber一家大几百人公司的CEO，大多数时间却泡在内部一个很小的团队里（这支团队倒是后来历经重重考验，成了我们今天AI Enablers的雏形）。我带着他们做了几个AI agent项目（again，那时候它们也不叫agents，大家都不知道该叫什么）。先是做了个扮演我们销售、客服的amber bot。当时连harness的概念都不存在，loop、tool call全靠手搓。东西很糙，但我乐在其中，而且越做越确信：这就是我2017年创立Amber AI时看到的未来：5到10年内，大部分经济行为，都会由AI智能体驱动。也是那年，明明还在crypto大牛市里，我发起https://t.co/QSrtEFAxg7加速器，在开幕演讲上大声喊出"crypto for AI"（“crypto应用不是给人用的，真正的用户是未来的AI智能体！”）台下，没几个人当真。 25年，我们做了个更超前的项目：aiac。试了很多东西，包括一件很酷、但酷到当时的模型和交互根本接不住的事——我们孵化的第一个agent，MIA（今天依然是我们AMBR智能体家族的长姐），有一个当时没人做过的能力：她能一边实时观察你的操作——鼠标移到哪、输入又删掉了什么——一边即时给建议、做互动。这个项目，坦白说，又失败了。但它生出了MIA。最早的MIA，作为一家crypto公司的marketing agent，只能管管我们几个社媒账号，每天生产一堆偶尔精品、绝大多数很烂的AI梗图（受限于当时的模型，烂得非常真诚）。 也是25年，我在公司里过得很孤独。一家做了快十年crypto finance公司里，有人想做交易，有人想做投资，有人想借着上市平台做集团化。这些都对，都是好生意，但都不是我想做的事。我犹豫过，心软过，甚至觉得对不起大家。但作为创业者，我没办法背叛自己的内心。分歧最激烈的时候，内部几乎是撕裂的。25年底，我做了九年来最难、但也最坚定的决定：归拢一切资源，做我内心最坚持的那件事：Build AI Agents。许多一路并肩的早期伙伴离开了，这里没有对错，只有感谢。 26年初，我一边收整团队、回归管理，一边反而抽出几乎所有零碎时间（有几天甚至连续不眠不休，我都37了！）干了件更任性的事：2月到3月，两个月里，我给自己做了11个specialised agents，研究和手搓了一堆harness、各种tools，把我的工作、生活、投资、交易、社交、健康、自我提升，全部交给我的个人agents打理。项目代号：extend me。这不是玩具，是我在用一次次vibe coding亲手验证一件事：各类垂直场景里的AI agents，到底能不能为一个真实、具体的人，创造真实、具体的价值。 答案是能！这个过程还让我更坚定了另一个判断：一家AI agent公司想成功，founder自己必须对什么是AI agent、怎么搭AI agent，有足够深的手感。 然后是我最想讲的故事。今年3月，我把aiac那支"失败"的团队，连同"失败"的MIA，整队开进了我们上市时收购后一直没精力打理的B端广告业务：iClick和CMRS。短短几个月，出乎几乎所有人（除了我）的意料：这块和Amber主业毫无关系的传统业务，焕发了新生——世界500强客户更满意了，内部运营大面积自动化，大量workflow完成了agent化，甚至开始自我迭代。上个月，从aiac失败中成长出来的MIA，成为我们第一个直接面向用户的垂类AI智能体产品。 有一位商业上比我成功得多、也年长得多的朋友，开过我一个玩笑："Michael，Amber这些年的问题，就在于你这个创始人太聪明、精力太旺盛，什么都想做：就像白天当大学教授，晚上还要去大学门口摆摊卖烤串。" 想想，确实如此。创业九年，Amber远没有达到我想要的高度，于我，最大的教训就是两个字：专注。 所以接下来十年，我要重新出发，只做一件事：Build AI Agents。 2017年9月，我创立这家公司时，它叫Amber AI。九年里，我们做过交易，做过crypto finance gateway，做过投资方，敲过钟。现在，我终于要回去实现内心最真实的梦想了。 9月1日，Amber会以一个（你可能会觉得似曾相识的）新名字，以一家接下来十年只专注做一件事——Build AI Agents——的新公司亮相。我们的旗舰AI agent，和已经悄悄上线一个月的MIA全新版本，也在同一天和大家见面。 回首我的创业前九年，Amber随着crypto finance的从零到一，有过成功与失败。 接下来十年，我只做一件事，build AI Agents that get you there。让AI智能体，为你创造真实、具体的价值。 9月1日，香港见。
- Sep 3, 20263.1x their median
听说 Fomo 钱包，已经把 Binance wallet 和 OKX wallet 干破防了 打磨了这么多年的产品，被一个一堆看来傻逼的短板问题、还理直气壮的收费这么贵的 Fomo 钱包，给夺了风头 据说Star 连续召集多次内部会，要把OKX 钱包做出Fomo 的功能，但无畏认为，华人交易所产品普遍缺乏对老外车头社区和西方meme原生文化的认同感，这不是一天两天了 而币安，仍然是从造资产的优势出发，例如最近三天速通Alpha 的 FLORK ，一贯是 BNB Chain 上通过财富效应快速打开局面的风格，先把注意力吸引过来，然后再产品技术学习跟上 欢迎来 fomo 注册，享 10% 手续费折扣 https://t.co/lLbe9AW5Hr
- Aug 9, 20262.3x their median
这种币，真的不管管吗？ 刚才这一根针，又有多少人倾家荡产啊？ 狗庄掌握98%的筹码，连操盘手都不需要找，想怎么画线怎么画线， 随意收割韭菜。 https://t.co/YrJEmSNYp8
- Sep 10, 20262.2x their median
高性价比的商K文化，是掐灭男性锻炼薄肌热情的一大原因 最近几次跑会，美国的朋友多次感慨：在亚洲的商K花几千到几万块钱到就可以选到各地的美女甚至顶美 而美国的商 K 价格会比国内贵几十上百倍，导致了美国男生只能靠疯狂内卷身材，才能增加约会/约炮成功率解决性压抑 这也是国内男人尤其是有钱的中年男人，毫无健身卷身材的动力的一个原因，相比之下，孙学更为实用：有钱了什么女人不会有？ 也就张继科这种薄肌男，在中国让大明星爱的死去活来，在美国路上到处都是卷死他的肌肉帅哥
- Aug 26, 20262.1x their median
特朗普家族的WLFI 代币最大金主周谷人，在中国居然是6起案件的失信执行人，还涉及走私、售假酒、英国洗钱案 《财新》今天起底了过去2年，许多媒体用“神秘人”代指投资WLFI超1亿美元的最大金主Aqua 1 的实控人周谷人 周谷人在币圈的经历也堪称传奇：一个经营和代理家族传统木材生意失败，在中国负债失信和在英国牵涉洗钱的84年的上海男人，来到阿布扎比转战币圈，短短几年几年就成为币圈大佬—— 阿联酋王室背书的成员，活跃于中国、中国和英国政商圈，甚至还搞了一个“阿联酋皇家特权集团总裁”的身份，涉足区块链 今年6月份，周谷人还被拍到和WLFI联创Zach一起出现在世界杯的私人包间 而关于Aqua 1 与Web3 Port 的关联，财新和其他媒体都有曝光过。Web3 Port 此前回应过，但始终未能澄清双方关系。
- Aug 13, 20262.1x their median
都在问李林的新交易所 UMX 怎么注册，整理了一下流程，需要邀请码的可以私信我 https://t.co/W3n5xpwDKC
- Aug 21, 20261.8x their median
今早在75k 止损了BTC 的空单，这单亏了约6万U 这段时间悲观的情绪、极差流动性让很多像无畏这样看空的人放松了警惕 做空的锚定效应太强了，低波动麻痹了危机感。结果预想中的最后一跌没有到来，而是突然直接开启了爆涨的行情 特别是止损犹豫了点，破了66k、70k、74k 连续三个止损位置都还想再扛一扛，错了还是要果断认输的，接下来大饼重新找机会和位置
- Aug 12, 20261.6x their median
昨天和深圳的朋友们一行20多人，在西北的一家餐厅吃烤全羊，不含酒水部分的消费才2200元 一方面感慨小地方的物价美丽，一方面感慨平时在Crypto 交易多了，很容易玩成欢乐豆，不把钱当钱了 还有，西北这边喝酒真的太猛了，无畏和他们打惯蛋，谁被炸一下就喝一杯白酒，被同花顺和5个炸一下要喝2杯，几局下来就趴菜了
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 88 interactions against 206K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 14,930 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.582% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 604 interactions, about 6.9x its own typical post.
- What is 加密无畏's engagement rate on X?
- 加密无畏 (@cryptobraveHQ) has an engagement rate of 0.043%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 205,857 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.043%, 加密无畏 sits above the 25th percentile of the 151,319 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @cryptobraveHQ have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (14,930 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @cryptobraveHQ post?
- Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.77 posts per day across the measured window.