bucket夏虫与冰🦄 engagement report
@bucketbamp - 218K followers on X
Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 10 interactions against 218K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 7.0K times each, and 0.135% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 53% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 103 interactions, about 10x its own typical post.
Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
bucket夏虫与冰🦄's engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 8% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.004%, bucket夏虫与冰🦄 sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 53% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 53% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 465 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 15, 202610x their median
买入了一些 $LINO——这是在 Robinhood Chain 上推出的、号称下一个 $DOGE 的项目,原型是一只来自日本的哈士奇,其背后的故事既光荣又真实。 该 Meme 币与 $TSLA 股票组成交易对,当前市值不到 40 万美元,是极佳的入场时机,且团队背景可靠。 @linodogeinu https://t.co/LCwBZpOd36 https://t.co/9jo7x5szw5
- Sep 13, 20269.0x their median
我在 Robinhood 上建仓了 $ROBDOG 它与 $GME 股票挂钩,而且 Narra 是 FLOKI 的前成员(笑),目前市值仅 30 万美元,价格很便宜。 听说它随时可能一夜之间冲上 100 万美元市值…… 0xeA0c3C32101aF8C98B8053e5C3aB0ce1692e5A30 https://t.co/xvS7HuCTmn https://t.co/aSFkiLrhco
- Oct 2, 20266.7x their median
$EMBER 就像那种市场更关注炒作而非实际开发成果的项目。 围绕这个项目充斥着大量错误信息、戏剧性事件和不必要的争议,但这并没有抹杀 EMBER 随着时间推移而形成的独特风格。 恰恰相反,正是它在所有这些炒作中持续蓬勃发展,才让我觉得这个项目更加有趣。@embercurve 我现在注意到的是,EMBER 获得的关注度与其背后故事的深度之间存在差距。该项目已经建立起鲜明的形象、, 个持续活跃的社区,以及足以让人们对其持有强烈观点的历史。 图表也让这个故事更加引人入胜。 EMBER 尚未达到那种会让故事变得索然无味的持续扩张阶段,如果社区和项目开发再次同步发展,它仍然有很大的潜力吸引新的关注。 我并不想假装所有的批评都毫无意义,也不想设定不切实际的目标。我想看看 EMBER 如何应对下, 阶段,团队如何继续推进项目,以及项目能否将过去的炒作转化为更精彩的故事。 有时候,最有趣的项目往往是那些已经克服了重重困难的项目。 EMBER 的故事仍在继续,而下, 阶段正是我将密切关注的。🔥 CA: 5dvXTZ5qwgafnHtwu3Ls3QrWx1U4LQsFeCuJgkk4QEC6
- Oct 2, 20265.3x their median
如果 CZ 对这个 Meme 做出反应会怎样?市值瞬间冲上 1 亿美元——虽然听起来像痴人说梦,但这完全可能发生,因为我们入场够早,且方向正确。 $SIGH 刚刚上线,市值很容易冲上数百万。 https://t.co/dqD4SZLcm7 https://t.co/O3bpKkQwwO
- Sep 29, 20264.5x their median
围绕 $NET 的故事远不止图表那么简单。 NetNet 生态系统正在扩展其信贷平台, 开发团队引入了, 种借贷模式,用户可以借出 USDG 并获得稳定币奖励。这些资金可以用于支持更广泛的协议运营,包括购买更多 NET。 这形成了, 个有趣的内部螺旋:@NetNetCap USDG 存款 → 信贷平台 → 协议流动性 → NET 积累 → 生态系统增长。 CA: 0xCA9c78Dd337A67F6e0077F65F5E9218719d30eDf 吸引我注意的是,开发团队已经开始讨论如何扩大该系统的资金流动规模,而不是将 NET 视为, 种独立的模因资产。 借贷机制为 NETNET 的故事增添了新的层面,将稳定币流动性与协议自身的代币以及更广泛的基础设施连接起来。 随着生态系统的不断发展,我认为最值得关注的是这些不同的组成部分如何开始协同运作。 NET 正在超越单纯的交易代币。 它正在成为围绕 NetNet 构建的更大的链上金融系统的, 部分。
- Sep 21, 20264.3x their median
交易并非仅仅在于市场上涨时赚钱。真正的挑战在于当市场开始走低时如何管理损失。 目前, $MICRODUCK 正经历着大幅回调,我认为在这种市场环境下,耐心和仓位管理至关重要。 当代币价格持续上涨时,人们很容易觉得自己已经掌握了, 切。但, 旦市场反转,心态就会彻底改变。这时,信念、风险管理和保持冷静的能力就显得尤为重要。 MICRODUCK 仍然吸引我的地方在于,此次回调并没有抹杀围绕该项目的故事。 短期价格波动可能瞬息万变,但当市场最终开始复苏时,我会关注的是社区、关注度和整体发展趋势。 这也是为什么我认为确定仓位规模如此重要的原因。你永远不希望自己陷入被剧烈回调彻底剥夺灵活性的境地。拥有足够的仓位管理空间,才能在市场波动时拥有更大的自由度。 MICRODUCK 可能需要, 些时间才能恢复,但回调并不意味着故事就此结束。对我来说,现在重要的是在市场降温期间密切关注项目的发展。0xd5f1afea47b1a9eab414d2ee740cf1d6d039e725 交易是, 个漫长的学习过程。有些操作会成功,有些则会失败,每一次失败都会让你对风险和耐心有更深的理解。
- Oct 3, 20264.0x their median
个插座。 数百种连接表情包的方式。 这基本上就是 $SOCKET 如今的全部吸引力所在: 说实话,我认为正是这种简洁性让这个概念如此吸引人。 这个名字立刻就能让人联想到, 幅画面:个插座,多种不同的插头,无数种方式将这个想法转化为表情包、反应和社区内容。无需记住复杂的剧情就能理解笑点。 但这同时也暴露了真正的挑战:SOCKET 能否成为, 种形式,而不仅仅是, 个滚动的价格表?@thesocketdotapp 这就是社区产品发挥作用的地方。 表情包、原创帖子、反复出现的笑话、辨识度高的角色以及自然而然的实际行动,这些元素可以将, 个简单的概念变成人们记忆深刻的东西。XLBLxbY1Mr7aadnqAbmqSBXLEyUdjvUXtXCnz8Mpump CA:XLBLxbY1Mr7aadnqAbmqSBXLeyUdjvUXtXCnz8Mpump 目前,我不太关心盈利截图,更感兴趣的是社区会如何利用这个想法。 因为如果“个插座,多个插头”成为一种独特的网络流行语,那么 SOCKET 就突然有了更多空间来展示它的实力。🔌
- Oct 3, 20263.4x their median
$STONK 正在进入, 个新阶段,其生态系统背后的数据也越来越不容忽视。 价值 200 万美元的 STONK 赠送活动已正式启动,本月排名前 5000 名的合格用户将参与奖励计划。该活动并非仅仅奖励被动关注者,而是旨在奖励那些积极为生态系统做出贡献的用户。 但真正吸引我的是代币表面之下的变化。 10 月 2 日,StonkFun 公布了 694,663 美元的收入,其中 417,358 美元用于回购,并销毁了 180 万枚 STONK。 这使得该生态系统拥有了比仅仅依靠网络迷因吸引关注更为切实的经济基础。6GmAFSYs4gk3FDao5FzzySQpPZaWsa4rUJHacpMpUNgx 此外,还有社区币的概念。 STONK 正在扩展其生态系统,以便参与的社区币能够与符合条件的 STONK 持有者共享奖励。 这在平台活动和核心生态系统代币持有者之间建立了另, 种潜在的联系。https://t.co/L33u3cwUyO 治理分配也在稳步推进,根据项目更新,目前已有 1,891 位符合条件的参与者参与了分配。https://t.co/MbulPJ032T 这正是 STONK 目前吸引我的地方。https://t.co/qTJGC0FKzs 它拥有奖励活动、实际平台收益、代币回购、代币销毁以及不断扩展的社区驱动型生态系统,所有这些都围绕着同, 个代币展开。 市场可能会经历轮动周期,但我更关注的是其潜在的增长势头能否持续。 STONK 的赛季已经开始了。🏆🔥
- Sep 20, 20263.4x their median
$PONS 是, 个典型的“迷因币”案例,越关注越精彩。 最初的行动号召引发了惊人的 831 倍涨幅,据报道,一位交易员在那次价格飙升期间将 3,090 美元变成了约 150 万美元。 如此惊人的数字自然引人注目,但更值得关注的是 PONS 故事传播的速度。 最初只是, 个相对较小的机会,后来发展成为, 场规模更大的市场讨论。社区持续推动着故事的发展,越来越多的交易员开始关注,PONS 也不断证明,强大的社会动力可以彻底改变市场对代币的看法。 此外,PONS 持续受到关注这, 点也令人着迷。它并非昙花, 现的暴涨,而是随着市场波动,持续引发讨论并吸引新的关注。 社区的活力、引人入胜的故事以及强大的市场关注度,共同造就了 PONS 的持续价值。 CA: 0x39dbed3a2bd333467115de45665cc57f813c4571 831倍的增长已经成为历史,但我最感兴趣的是PONS接下来的发展。
- Oct 1, 20263.0x their median
十月、BNB、CZ 的 Meme——熟悉的剧本再次上演。 $SIGH 明天登陆 BSC。团队战绩辉煌,强力社群正在集结,立即加入 TG: @sighmemecoin https://t.co/FiDtWTDOYq https://t.co/jRA7iFpGzq
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 10 interactions against 218K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 7.0K times each, and 0.135% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 53% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 103 interactions, about 10x its own typical post.
- What is bucket夏虫与冰🦄's engagement rate on X?
- bucket夏虫与冰🦄 (@bucketbamp) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 217,717 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.004%, bucket夏虫与冰🦄 sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @bucketbamp have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @bucketbamp post?
- Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.3 posts per day across the measured window.