PlayerSells
Back to @brutalfightz's profile

👊🏾BrutalFights🥶 engagement report

@brutalfightz - 1.6M followers on X

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.142%
of 1.6M followers
Per impression
1.27%
182K views on a typical post
Reach
11.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.241%
438 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.13/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2.3K interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.142%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 182K times each, and 1.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

👊🏾BrutalFights🥶's engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.142%, 👊🏾BrutalFights🥶 sits above the 50th percentile of the 9,981 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.047% to 0.325%.

p100.001%
p250.007%
p50 (median)0.047%
p750.325%
p902.60%
p99357.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,981 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 447,404 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.007%
50th percentile0.047%
75th percentile0.325%
90th percentile2.60%
99th percentile357.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link0% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length-+7%+4% to +9%7.2K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 61 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 7% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 3, 202617x their median

    What did we learn? https://t.co/IAYDPvPwUd

    36K1.0K1.6K552.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 202613x their median

    No words, just Fernanda Mota Farhat 😍 https://t.co/VG8DSNB34E

    31K4812725775K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 202612x their median

    This Is Why You Don’t Fight With A Dress!!! 👀😳 https://t.co/sk8UKrvbYU

    27K9981.0K772.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 202612x their median

    One woman’s trash is another woman’s treasure https://t.co/QO6nMZKrR1

    27K429238176.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202611x their median

    Bro a Real One 💀 https://t.co/psZOmEPUi9

    25K51552030458K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20269.8x their median

    Birthday Stri*per Gone Wrong 💀 https://t.co/cRFbcxY4iJ

    22K432326363.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20268.6x their median

    bro was born ready 💀 https://t.co/PrrkUniV6b

    18K7257851535.8M viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20266.7x their median

    Do you Need Water?!! 👀👀😳 https://t.co/49gf2bnWJ9

    15K33218431.6M viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20266.4x their median

    I don’t get why they get so close is it the tire smell? 😳😭 https://t.co/BwqfRJtUtg

    13K6711.1K1544.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20266.0x their median

    Name a bigger crashout than this 😭 https://t.co/hBIgaFkTkm

    13K3292781101.9M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.3K interactions against 1.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.142%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 182K times each, and 1.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 39K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

What is 👊🏾BrutalFights🥶's engagement rate on X?
👊🏾BrutalFights🥶 (@brutalfightz) has an engagement rate of 0.142%, based on the median interactions across 46 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,626,079 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.142%, 👊🏾BrutalFights🥶 sits above the 50th percentile of the 9,981 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @brutalfightz have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @brutalfightz post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going