Back to @appwrite's profile

Appwrite engagement report

@appwrite - 126K followers on X

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.017%
of 126K followers
Per impression
0.746%
2.8K views on a typical post
Reach
2.24%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
21
interactions (median)
Saved
0.178%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.1/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 21 interactions against 126K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.8K times each, and 0.746% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.24% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 69% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 204 interactions, about 9.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Appwrite's engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 33% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.017%, Appwrite sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,102 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,052 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video96% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link69% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 96% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 69% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 251 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 20269.7x their median

    The wait is over. Our biggest release yet has arrived 🚀 Appwrite 2.0 brings you native PostgreSQL and MySQL, five database types, S3-compatible storage, OAuth 2.1, Domains, Firewall, a rebuilt Console, and more. Explore now: https://t.co/NFH0HnyImF https://t.co/SfVvjJYQ6m

    16811187204K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20264.2x their median

    Appwrite 2.0 is now available for self-hosting 🔥 It ships with a rebuilt Console, PostgreSQL as the default underlying database, Hyperloop B, and a new combined worker topology that cuts a default install from 33 containers to 16. Read more: https://t.co/S1iILl6gJu https://t.co/A3hF1k4fDY

    766605.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.2x their median

    Hyperloop B is the new engine powering Appwrite 2.0, built on foundational work started by our friend and teammate Binyamin Yawitz. Binyamin sadly passed away before he could see his work completed. Today, that work allows Appwrite to handle up to 8x more I/O load. We named Hyperloop B in his memory. His work now powers every Appwrite project. ❤️

    602515.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20263.1x their median

    Appwrite 2.1 is now available for self-hosting 🚀 The S3 API and AutoGravity are now available on your own instance, alongside TikTok and Kakao as OAuth2 providers, new runtimes, and fixes across Appwrite Console. Read more: https://t.co/ue2eoeWSzY https://t.co/20HyK1FmIr

    532914.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20262.9x their median

    Next stop: production. 🚌 https://t.co/Oe3GQOaNBz

    491914.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.7x their median

    this is where the vibes usually end https://t.co/dyxYfdrBOo

    505204.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20262.4x their median

    You can now use Drizzle ORM with Appwrite Postgres. Define your schema in TypeScript, write typed queries, and manage database changes with SQL migrations through Drizzle Kit. Follow the guide: https://t.co/xKZgKPH58h https://t.co/whKPe8Lzj5

    394703.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20262.2x their median

    Appwrite 2.0 is live on Product Hunt 🚀 After a huge Init, we’re excited to officially launch Appwrite 2.0 on Product Hunt today. Come say hi, share your feedback, and join us here 👇 https://t.co/MpqtLJAcus https://t.co/DA07Pe4UX1

    3131113.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20261.9x their median

    That’s a wrap on Init 2026 🚀 Over five days, we shipped some of the biggest updates we’ve ever made to Appwrite: • Appwrite 2.0 • A completely new Appwrite Console • Hyperloop B • Native PostgreSQL • VectorsDB • DocumentsDB • Native MySQL • S3 API support • Appwrite Firewall • Appwrite OAuth2 server • Appwrite Domains Thank you to everyone who joined the livestreams, AMAs, Discord events, shared feedback, and celebrated every launch with us ❤️ Now we can’t wait to see what you build next. Catch up on everything we shipped: https://t.co/7rau2MelGv

    342122.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20261.7x their median

    We’re already #2 on Product Hunt today ❤️ Thank you for all the support so far. If you haven’t stopped by yet, come say hi, ask us anything about Appwrite 2.0, or just hang out with us in the comments. We'll be there 👇 https://t.co/MpqtLJAcus https://t.co/DgeoPivq68

    262612.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 21 interactions against 126K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.8K times each, and 0.746% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.24% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 69% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 204 interactions, about 9.7x its own typical post.

What is Appwrite's engagement rate on X?
Appwrite (@appwrite) has an engagement rate of 0.017%, based on the median interactions across 55 original posts from the last 30 days against 125,895 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.017%, Appwrite sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @appwrite have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @appwrite post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going