Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹 engagement report
@angeloinchina - 295K followers on X
Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 410 interactions against 295K followers, an engagement rate of 0.139%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 3.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 48% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.9K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gold, #chinaevolve, #chinatrade.
Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026. Recurring tags: #gold, #chinaevolve, #chinatrade.
Compared with accounts its own size
Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 82% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.139%, Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹 sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.128% to 0.604%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 83% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 48% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 48% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 1100 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 19, 202612x their median
Ansar’Allah Cannot Be Beaten Not because of the missiles. Because of what they still have. These tribes have been fighting empires in those mountains for hundreds of years. Ottomans came and left. British came and left. Saudis came with American planes and still couldn’t finish the job. The land itself teaches you. Kids grow up knowing every hill and every path. They wear the same simple clothes their grandfathers wore. They walk in sandals and they know how to shoot. That’s not weakness. That’s memory. FAITH is real there. It’s why a young guy stands on a ridge with a rifle and doesn’t run when the jets come. Patriotism isn’t a speech. It’s just not letting outsiders take your home. Their culture says dying on your own land is better than living under someone else’s rules. The other side doesn’t have that. Princes fly to London and Geneva. Their soldiers get paid. Western armies sit in air-conditioned bases then go home and argue about other things. Their elites worry about money and old files. Look at the videos. Thousands of men walking through the dust with rifles. No fancy gear. No press people. Just numbers and the feeling that this land is theirs. Countries that forget what people will die for always lose to the ones who still remember. Ansar’Allah remembers.
- Sep 10, 20268.2x their median
The House of SAUD will fall.
- Sep 3, 20266.1x their median
Hong Kong: what Western media didn’t want to hear I write this as Joshua Wong faces a possible life sentence for treason and colluding with foreign forces. The West is already preparing the halo. Spare me. In 2019 I stood at Tamar Square in Hong Kong and said what the cameras did not want to hear. This was not a “pro-democracy movement.” It was a US color-revolution attempt. NED, USAID, Soros networks, Western politicians and a handful of local proxies tried to turn a real extradition-bill dispute into chaos — smash the city, break One Country Two Systems, and use Hong Kong as a dagger against China. I lived it. I spoke against it. We fought the funded rioters who wanted the city in flames. Death threats followed. Fine. I was not there to please Western editors. Wong was never a student hero. He was a useful face for an “international battlefront”: lobby Pelosi, Rubio and the rest, beg for sanctions, invite foreign pressure on his own city. That is not dissent. That is inviting an empire into your house and calling it freedom. Collusion has a name. Now it has a courtroom. Color revolutions are not freedom. They are regime-change software. Same playbook every time: • hijack a genuine grievance • flood money, training, slogans, cameras • escalate from protest to violence • install a government that answers to Washington and the NGO machine • strip sovereignty and call it “values” Ukraine is the textbook. Maidan was sold as Europe and dignity. What it delivered was a captured state, NATO as religion, and a country turned into a proxy. That path led straight to war. A color revolution on a fault line does not “liberate.” It prepares the battlefield. Last year the same circus hit Nepal. Youth anger at corruption was real. Then Discord mobilization, burned ministries, a government toppled in days. And the usual clowns — self-proclaimed “China experts” — cheered like it was a festival. Why? Because they told the story people already wanted to hear. No research. No history of how these operations end. They wanted to look cool. They wanted views at the expense of truth. That is not analysis. That is content. With influence comes responsibility. They had the first and dumped the second. Look at Japan. Look at the Philippines. That is the finished product when the operation works: not always tanks in the streets — bases, treaties, media, a political class that treats US priorities as destiny. Tools of the empire. I cannot highlight this enough. These revolutions are evil because they steal the one thing a people must never outsource: the right to solve their own problems. Sovereignty is the foundation of any real democracy. Without it you get a flag, a parliament, and a foreign handler. Hong Kong 2019 was the warning. Ukraine was the cost. Nepal was the encore the pundits still applauded. Joshua Wong’s trial is the reminder that inviting foreign force against your own country is not activism. It is betrayal. May this era of meddling end. Self-determination. Peace. Mutual prosperity. Sovereignty above all.
- Jan 11, 20255.9x their median
Want to know why Greenland has been kept : - very poor - under-developed - living out of welfare paid by Denmark (500 Million dollars per year. While it has trillions of dollars in mining, gas and oil.. Easy, same as the general strategy of the West in the Global South, use NGOs (climate change, diversity, human rights, animal protections) to completely block any developments. Those NGOs are mainly financed by the US, blackjack and other Wall Street vultures. This way the US can better control and influence the 50'000 people in Greenland by giving freebies through USAID to manipulate civil society, education. The idea for the US is to > - push for independence - once independent either strike a multi-billion dollar deal or by force if necessary. Basically pay thousand times less than what Greenland is worth. If people from Greenland were able to tap into their resources they would be by far the richest nation per capita on earth. Instead they are living out of social welfare, the same as native Indians were treated by the colonisers in the USA, give them survival money and alcohol and turn a proud nation into parasite, zombified nation. US leadership doesn't care about Greenland, it only sees trillions dollars of reserves, huge real estate asset and strategic land on the artic route.
- Sep 4, 20265.8x their median
Joshua Wong: The Useful Face of America’s Colour Revolution Against China Joshua Wong is not a democracy icon. He is not a student hero. He is the local face Washington needed to run a colour revolution against China. 2019 was not an organic uprising. It was a framed dispute, then money, training, cameras, fire, and an “international front.” Fly the teenager to Pelosi and Rubio. Ask foreign states to sanction his own city. Call it freedom. That is not dissent. That is collusion. The United States preaches ballots and steals the first pillar of democracy: sovereignty. Without sovereignty there is no self-government — only a franchise. Colour revolutions outsource the decision. The empire keeps the script. The local face keeps the sentence. Hong Kong was the dagger. One Country Two Systems was the showroom for Taiwan. Smash the showroom, film the fires, tell Taipei there is no formula except confrontation. That is how you kill a political settlement and keep the Strait as a weapons problem. Full article: https://t.co/s6Ju3BdOMf If the work is useful, support it: https://t.co/Hy8rzoBa7V
- Sep 3, 20265.0x their median
Beijing and Moscow almost saw the betrayal coming — that is why they did not intervene in Venezuela. Not weakness. Calculation. Westerners keep reading China and Russia through a Hollywood lens. If you are powerful, you send ships. If you have partners, you rescue them. If you talk about a new order, you must behave like Washington with different flags. That is projection. Multipolarity is not the next global policeman. It is sovereignty, trade, infrastructure, and the refusal to police the planet. Caracas is America’s backyard. A short flight from Florida. For Beijing and Moscow it is an ocean away, no nearby bases, no navy that can challenge the Fourth Fleet without walking into a trap. Russia is still bleeding in Ukraine. China is focused on Taiwan, energy close to home, and trade with Brazil, Mexico and Colombia. One compromised partner cannot become the pillar of an entire regional policy. They also had eyes inside. Chávez never trusted Delcy Rodríguez. After she called him huevón on the plane he sidelined her for years. He saw the character: ambitious, slogans as a job. When the job changed, so did the slogans. Machado was the product — Nobel, exile ops, Washington’s photogenic face. Useful for sanctions. Useless for delivering oil without setting the country on fire. So they kept Delcy. She signed. Majority control. “Sovereignty.” Century of humiliation. 100 tears. China and Russia declined to die on that hill. They had already read the people standing on it. Full article: https://t.co/nfZYmmbC5y If this work is useful, support it here: https://t.co/Hy8rzoBa7V
- Sep 5, 20265.0x their median
Hong Kong Colour Revolution 2019: They Paid the Students, Then Called It “Research” I have lived in China since 1995 and I was in Hong Kong throughout 2019, so I did not need a think-tank briefing to understand what was unfolding in front of me: it was never a spontaneous student democracy movement, but a colour-revolution operation that took genuine local grievances, flooded them with foreign money and training, and then pushed the city toward chaos in the hope of smashing One Country Two Systems and turning Hong Kong into a dagger against the mainland. Kit Klarenberg had pulled something out of an academic journal that Western media still treat as if it never existed. Western researchers randomly selected 849 University of Hong Kong students and incentivized them around the July 1 marches in 2017 and 2018. Students were paid not, they insist, “directly for protesting,” but for showing up and uploading crowd-size data, with an extra bonus of HK$350. The study found that money plus social networks produced sustained turnout. The same team had already been running related experiments on Hong Kong students for years, with NBER and other Western funding links. When the campus sieges exploded in late 2019, the university ethics board asked the authors to remove references to IRB approval because the work had gone beyond what was authorized. They present this as social science. Anyone who watched the Hong Kong colour revolution of 2019 with their own eyes recognizes field-testing. I saw the white-shirt coordinators directing the crowd, I saw foreigners connected to embassies and the usual NED/CIA orbit giving instructions, and I saw how a protest that began with a specific legal dispute was hijacked, funded, trained and escalated until petrol bombs, barricades and arrows became the daily language of “democracy.” Klarenberg’s article is not conspiracy theory; it is an academic paper the Empire forgot to hide. Read it, then ask yourself why every colour revolution follows the same script. https://t.co/h4wwDe1Jrz Turn off the Western media and look at the receipts. ☕ Support my work: https://t.co/RhdNXkKPeb Independent analysis from someone who has lived in China since 1995. No oligarchs. No embassy scripts. Just the record.
- Aug 31, 20264.8x their median
Sánchez says the migrant chaos in Ceuta wasn't his fault, it was Russia and Israel. Definitely not his own open-border fantasy. Blame the "hoaxes", Moscow, and the far-right. Blame anyone but yourself. https://t.co/SqfrkxdZz2
- Aug 31, 20264.2x their median
María Corina Machado Could Never Deliver the Oil: Why Trump Chose Delcy Rodríguez Over the CIA Asset in Venezuela Trump didn’t pick the CIA asset. He picked the one who could actually deliver the oil. That is the whole story. Everything else is theater. María Corina Machado was the product. Nobel, exile ops, CIA extraction, the photogenic face of “democracy.” She was useful when the job was to scream, sanction, and wait for collapse. She was useless when the job became: keep the army from splitting, keep the oil flowing, keep the streets from burning while Washington takes majority control of 65 billion barrels. Delcy Rodríguez did what the US controlled opposition was never going to do. She sat across the table, signed the 25-year deal, smiled for the cameras, and called it “endless benefits” and “sovereignty.” Machado could never have signed that paper without setting half the country on fire. The security services would not have followed her. The colectivos would not have stood down. The oil infrastructure would have become a battlefield. You would have had Libya with extra steps. The Empire understood this. The CIA assessment was not mysterious. Regime loyalists were “best placed” for a temporary government. Translation: we need someone who already commands the guns and the ministries, not someone we airlifted out and then tried to parachute back in as president. So they kept Delcy. They kept enough of the old machine to avoid civil war. Then they made her sell Venezuela’s main asset. That is the humiliation. Chavistas now watch their own vice-president — the one who used to shout anti-imperialist slogans — defend a deal that gives the United States majority control of strategic fields for a generation. Some peanuts for a barrel to Caracas. The rest to the partnership. “We keep sovereignty.” The language of a surrender dressed as a historic victory. And the Machado clan? They go along. Of course they do. The US-friendly opposition was never going to fight a deal that Washington wanted. They get to stay relevant, stay funded, stay in the conversation while the actual transfer of resources happens under a Chavista letterhead. Perfect. No messy civil war. No need to occupy. Just a traitor on the inside and a compliant opposition on the outside. Chávez never trusted Delcy Rodriguez > After she called him huevón on the plane he sidelined her for years. He saw the character: ambitious, pretentious, not really of the project. The slogans were a job. When the job changed, so did the slogans. Palestine one season, coordination with the people who kidnapped the president the next. Empty words. Then the contract. The crowds now look quiet. They are watching the deals, the overconfidence, the humiliation negotiated in their name. But then…..Chavez revolution left something the powerful still fear: Chavez cultivated political consciousness and critical thinking. Another revolution is possible. Revenges is a dish best eaten cold. Delcy Rodríguez will not end well. Neither will the people who thought they could auction Venezuela and keep the title.
- Sep 19, 20264.1x their median
I believe this is the first time Yemeni forces have used a hypersonic missile to strike Saudi Arabia. The coming days will be very bad for Saudi Arabia. https://t.co/9eDlXwL5aR
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 410 interactions against 295K followers, an engagement rate of 0.139%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 3.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 48% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.9K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gold, #chinaevolve, #chinatrade.
- What is Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹's engagement rate on X?
- Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹 (@angeloinchina) has an engagement rate of 0.139%, based on the median interactions across 60 original posts from the last 30 days against 295,104 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.139%, Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹 sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @angeloinchina have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @angeloinchina post?
- Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.33 posts per day across the measured window.