Back to @abduzeedo's profile

Fabio - abduzeedo engagement report

@abduzeedo - 213K followers on X

Measured over 78 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.018%
of 213K followers
Per impression
0.959%
4.0K views on a typical post
Reach
1.86%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
38
interactions (median)
Saved
0.379%
15 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.27/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 38 interactions against 213K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 78 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.0K times each, and 0.959% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 78 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 82% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 50K interactions, about 1306x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #branding, #packaging.

Measured over 78 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026. Recurring tags: #branding, #packaging.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fabio - abduzeedo's engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 42% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.018%, Fabio - abduzeedo sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,515 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,515 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,033 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video92% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link82% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 92% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 82% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 286 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 11, 20261306x their median

    Lograron conectar una PlayStation 5 con HDMI 2.1 a un televisor blanco y negro de 1949 usando varios adaptadores. https://t.co/3TJNCdwP2P

    47K2.1K1771142.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 2026257x their median

    Bare Knuckle II (Streets of Rage 2) in the actual streets of Tokyo. I’ve been building an engine to reconstruct games and re-render them in new ways. One of them is spatial rendering. This runs standalone on Meta Quest 3 with a PS5 gamepad. https://t.co/aDhv0qw17t

    7.8K1.5K271187417K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026229x their median

    WAH-PAH! This morning, boogie boarder Ethan explained the high surf conditions on the OC coast to @JSarkissian. https://t.co/A2BQoT3sYD

    7.9K4441901632.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202646x their median

    Streets of Rage 2 📅 Release: 1992 🎮 Platform: Sega Mega Drive 🏁 Genre: Beat 'em up 👤 Developer: Ancient 🏢 Publisher: Sega https://t.co/ywdRmulUT7

    1.5K198461737K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202639x their median

    Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles IV: Turtles in Time 📅 Release: 1992 🎮 Platform: SNES 🏁 Genre: Beat 'em up 👤 Developer: Konami 🏢 Publisher: Konami https://t.co/qx5ulehhdq

    1.3K168251931K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202633x their median

    Designing for iPhone Duo is live on the HIG. Read it to your ai as a bedtime story 🪩 https://t.co/GcQynauY9S https://t.co/6EcY81pzpW

    1.1K1162811109K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202616x their median

    A physical display by Soiboi soft. It's probably the best single piece of technology I've seen made for visually impaired people. Love it! https://t.co/MIhbu1NESc

    52046231031K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202610x their median

    Streets of Rage II? https://t.co/pdYM8iBLTN

    3691314219K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20266.2x their median

    Koto's Stack Overflow rebrand casts the platform as the human-truth anchor of the AI era, in a generative identity built to stay always in build. They really need that. I really don't remember the last time I went there since AI. "Is there a place for Stack Overflow in an AI-first world? Koto treated that as an existential question, not a styling exercise. Their answer reframes the platform's vast archive of expert discussion and human-validated knowledge as a goldmine" https://t.co/GFnfLLE3W8

    2278108.8K viewsView on X
  • Mar 25, 20215.0x their median

    The best way to experience our site on iOS. No ads, no cookies, no tracking, just inspiration. https://t.co/a18BBTXJyD - also Second app I built from the scratch with #swiftui - thanks for the help @rfsbsb :) https://t.co/qAFQ91cQj0

    16414110View on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#branding#packaging

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 38 interactions against 213K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 78 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.0K times each, and 0.959% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 78 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 82% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 50K interactions, about 1306x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #branding, #packaging.

What is Fabio - abduzeedo's engagement rate on X?
Fabio - abduzeedo (@abduzeedo) has an engagement rate of 0.018%, based on the median interactions across 78 original posts from the last 30 days against 213,058 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.018%, Fabio - abduzeedo sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,515 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @abduzeedo have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @abduzeedo post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going