Yesjulz engagement report
@YesJulz - 380K followers on X
Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 532 interactions against 380K followers, an engagement rate of 0.141%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 1.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video and 13% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 58x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #kikiween, #vma.
Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #kikiween, #vma.
Compared with accounts its own size
Yesjulz's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 58% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.141%, Yesjulz sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,396 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.127% to 0.604%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.127% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 30% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 4% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 30% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 107 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 27, 202658x their median
beyond a certain net worth, negotiating with people less privileged than you (cab drivers, house help, carpenters etc) causes rot to the soul. just overpay and move on
- Sep 1, 202648x their median
Naomi Osaka’s Allen Iverson look for the 2026 US Open 👀 https://t.co/h1aEFhCSJv
- Feb 9, 202652x their median
Let’s applaud @CharmLadonna for the choreography she brings to the Super Bowl! Benito Bowl, Beyoncé’s Christmas Halftime Show, The Weeknd and Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl… all brought to life through her incredible choreography. https://t.co/erHunaDyZD
- Sep 8, 202644x their median
https://t.co/kx2GxpSSzr
- Aug 29, 202636x their median
https://t.co/EmOG699bVb
- Sep 7, 202635x their median
to be rich and smoke in random places around the world https://t.co/U01zlcz9VT
- Jun 18, 202231x their median
Three 6 Mafia defeating Dolly Parton and winning Best Original Song is still the single greatest moment in Oscars history https://t.co/dP8VfN7QAG
- Sep 8, 202618x their median
I know she a dime, I can tell by her shape ⏳ https://t.co/6fXUIp3wJF
- Sep 30, 202617x their median
https://t.co/3vPOFonQBe
- Sep 30, 202613x their median
https://t.co/EgEMYsZBKI
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 532 interactions against 380K followers, an engagement rate of 0.141%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 1.57% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video and 13% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 58x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #kikiween, #vma.
- What is Yesjulz's engagement rate on X?
- Yesjulz (@YesJulz) has an engagement rate of 0.141%, based on the median interactions across 46 original posts from the last 30 days against 380,256 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.141%, Yesjulz sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,396 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @YesJulz have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @YesJulz post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.77 posts per day across the measured window.