Back to @WiStateJournal's profile

Wisconsin State Journal engagement report

@WiStateJournal - 85K followers on X

Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 85K followers
Per impression
0%
976 views on a typical post
Reach
1.14%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.8/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 85K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 976 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.15% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video and 26% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22 interactions.

Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Wisconsin State Journal's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, Wisconsin State Journal sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,282 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,282 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,969 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video74% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link26% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 74% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 26% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 197 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 2026

    Tammy Baldwin offers federal help if Madison City Council finally adopts modern transparency technology for police in wake of Corey Ruiz shooting https://t.co/dHhj3VOfOc

    112633.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026

    The Badgers open their home schedule against Boston University with Ava McNaughton back at practice following a lower-body injury. ➡️ Find link to story in bio https://t.co/f9XZPgjS2a

    130001.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026

    Thanks to a local nonprofit, the Madison Police Department can equip all of its patrol officers with body-worn cameras next year. ➡️ Find link to story in bio https://t.co/9prjs9cHJN

    71201.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    Adrian Treves, a professor of environmental studies at UW-Madison and co-author of the latest study, said his hope is the study helps guide lawmakers when the next debate over wolf populations arises. https://t.co/v8p8cDMSWf

    34001.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    When Madison students start this fall, two more schools will offer free lunch, three schools will have new names and students will face phone restrictions. https://t.co/nnYAo6XOyV

    11401.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 2026

    340 nurses voted 71% in favor of forming a union with SEIU Wisconsin, joining St. Mary’s Hospital nurses and a growing wave of healthcare unionizations. ➡️ Find link to story in bio https://t.co/l9l6j8z9Xh

    40011.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    Federal authorities plan coordinated investigations into alleged illegal balloting by immigrants, examining registration records across nine jurisdictions before November’s midterm elections. https://t.co/mB7FBW3uEn

    3110746 viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    UW-Madison police arrested two Fitchburg men early Saturday. https://t.co/fiXrFPXiuZ

    31012.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 2026

    The city has asked the state Supreme Court to take up the case. https://t.co/FSG2sPZYiu

    32002.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026

    Wisconsin’s defense repeatedly kept the Badgers alive, setting the stage for a 17-point comeback and the program's first win at Penn State since 2003. ➡️ Find link to story in bio https://t.co/PeQqbwfaD0

    30011.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 85K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 976 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.15% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video and 26% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22 interactions.

What is Wisconsin State Journal's engagement rate on X?
Wisconsin State Journal (@WiStateJournal) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 54 original posts from the last 30 days against 85,238 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, Wisconsin State Journal sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,282 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @WiStateJournal have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @WiStateJournal post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going