Prof. Dr. Veysi Ceri engagement report
@VeysiCe - 1.4M followers on X
Measured over 72 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 23, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 130 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 72 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 0.362% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.55% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 72 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 109x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #canli, #canlı.
Measured over 72 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 23, 2026. Recurring tags: #canli, #canlı.
Compared with accounts its own size
Prof. Dr. Veysi Ceri's engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 26% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.009%, Prof. Dr. Veysi Ceri sits above the 25th percentile of the 10,985 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.007% to 0.05%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.001% |
| 25th percentile | 0.007% |
| 50th percentile | 0.05% |
| 75th percentile | 0.331% |
| 90th percentile | 2.50% |
| 99th percentile | 332.2% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | 0% | 15K |
| 01:00 UTC | +4% | 15K |
| 02:00 UTC | -1% | 14K |
| 03:00 UTC | -2% | 15K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 12K |
| 05:00 UTC | -5% | 12K |
| 06:00 UTC | -7% | 13K |
| 07:00 UTC | -6% | 14K |
| 08:00 UTC | -7% | 17K |
| 09:00 UTC | -2% | 19K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 20K |
| 11:00 UTC | -2% | 22K |
| 12:00 UTC | -1% | 24K |
| 13:00 UTC | +1% | 27K |
| 14:00 UTC | -2% | 29K |
| 15:00 UTC | -1% | 30K |
| 16:00 UTC | -1% | 30K |
| 17:00 UTC | -1% | 28K |
| 18:00 UTC | +1% | 25K |
| 19:00 UTC | 0% | 24K |
| 20:00 UTC | 0% | 22K |
| 21:00 UTC | +1% | 19K |
| 22:00 UTC | +1% | 17K |
| 23:00 UTC | +1% | 15K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +8% | 59K |
| Monday | +8% | 72K |
| Tuesday | +1% | 94K |
| Wednesday | -4% | 78K |
| Thursday | -3% | 71K |
| Friday | -5% | 73K |
| Saturday | +2% | 64K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 69% of posts | +79% | +73% to +85% | 5.8K |
| Outbound link | 17% of posts | -49% | -50% to -47% | 6.1K |
| Typical length | - | +13% | +10% to +15% | 6.4K |
- 69% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 325 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 13% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 14, 2026109x their median
ABD'de, 5 yaşındaki bir çocuğa tecavüz edip öldürmüş olan bir kişi, bugün idam edildi. Darısı bizdeki çocuk istismarcılarının başına.
- Aug 18, 2026104x their median
I am not happy about the Economist’s article, which feels like a hit piece. There is also a background to it, which is more troubling (as I will share at some point). I asked them to allow me to respond. I am waiting for their answer. If not in the magazine, I will share my response here.
- Aug 10, 202666x their median
Harvard ve MIT, Dünya nüfusuna denk 8.3 milyar sanal insan yarattı. Dünya nüfusunun dijital ikizi de diyebiliriz buna. Adı: MatrAIx. Her birinin 1.290 farklı özelliği var: yaş, psikoloji, harcama alışkanlığı, teknik bilgisi, hatta “fiyat artınca ne kadar tereddüt eder” seviyesinde detay. Tabi bu bilgiler bizim sanal dünyaya bir şekilde sunduğumuz bilgilerden derlenmiş. Nitekim sanal insanlar GPT ve Claude gibi modellerin içine giydirilince, anketlerde, sohbetlerde, web sitelerinde ve uygulamalarda neredeyse gerçek gibi davranıyorlar. Testlerde kişilik tutarlılığı %91.5. Artık bir meseleyi muhtemelen sanal dünyadaki bu bireylere yani matrixteki izdüşümlerimize yaşatıp istedikleri sonucu alırlarsa gerçek dünyada hayata geçirecekler. Pazar araştırması firmalarını, odak gruplarını, haftalar süren anketleri beklemeden… Tek bir sunucuda, bir gecede. Bu, pazarlamanın, ürün geliştirmenin ve davranışsal bilimin kurallarını sessizce değiştiren bir kilometre taşı. Dünya nüfusunun dijital ikizi ya da woodo bebeği artık ellerinde.
- Aug 18, 202655x their median
yalvarırım restorasyon yapmayın artık, memleketi kenar mahallenin ucuz pasta dükkânına çevirdiniz. https://t.co/SL698vBvNY
- Aug 18, 202641x their median
Bolu'da evlerinin yıkılacağı gerekçesiyle tahliye edildiklerini öne süren yüzde 49 görme engelli Emrah Yıldırım ve 3 aylık hamile eşi, geceyi parkta geçirmek zorunda kaldı. — Durumu öğrenen bir vatandaş, çifti evine kabul etti. 🗣 Emrah Yıldırım: Sadece eşim mutlu olsun yeter. Biz mutlu olalım, bir sıcak yuvamız olsun yeterli. Gerçekten de zor durumdayım. Ben şimdi işe girmek istiyorum fabrikaya, ömür boyu çalışamaz raporu var diyorlar, çalıştırmıyorlar.
- Aug 17, 202613x their median
Dün ben de aynı şekilde kaza geçiriyordum. Son anda fren tutup durdum. Trafik terörü bu. Başka bir şey değil. https://t.co/hweVsaQAmX
- Aug 20, 20269.8x their median
Doktorların elinden mühendislerin ürettiği bütün zımbırtıları alın bakalım… Nasıl çalışacaklar? 😄
- Aug 9, 20269.3x their median
Adana’da küçücük çocuğa araba verip bi de akan trafikte sürmesini kayda almışlar. Bu açıkça çocuğu da halkı da ölüm tehlikesiyle yüz yüze getirmek. Çocuğu bırakıp anne babasını hapse atmak gerektiğini düşünüyorum. https://t.co/IST76bf6fq
- Aug 16, 20268.3x their median
Aile Bakanı Mahinur Özdemir Göktaş: “Bugün hanelerimizin %57’sinde hiç çocuk bulunmuyor. Bunu değiştirmemiz lazım. Aile bizim en güvenli limanımız.” https://t.co/pcEQ6HQr4l
- Aug 18, 20267.6x their median
Esenyurt’ta boşanma aşamasında olan bir çift çocuklarının gözü önünde birbirine girdi. Kocası, eşi için ağza alınmayacak cümleler kurdu. https://t.co/U6EfG9Qspw
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 130 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 72 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 0.362% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.55% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 72 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 109x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #canli, #canlı.
- What is Prof. Dr. Veysi Ceri's engagement rate on X?
- Prof. Dr. Veysi Ceri (@VeysiCe) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 72 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,410,003 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.009%, Prof. Dr. Veysi Ceri sits above the 25th percentile of the 10,985 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @VeysiCe have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @VeysiCe post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.03 posts per day across the measured window.