Back to @VICENews's profile

VICE News engagement report

@VICENews - 906K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 906K followers
Per impression
0.127%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
1.30%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
15
interactions (median)
Saved
0.017%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.53/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 15 interactions against 906K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.127% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 15% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 555 interactions, about 37x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

VICE News's engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 10% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, VICE News sits below the 10th percentile of the 157,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,055 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 201 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 20, 202637x their median

    What would you do if you were seated next to a serial killer? Sean Penn recalls the story of living next to serial killer Richard Ramirez for 30+ days in an L.A. county jail. Full interview on YouTube. https://t.co/Ejvfdpipv1

    4971739240K viewsView on X
  • Jun 9, 202620x their median

    When AI started to work for itself. https://t.co/WmQnYA6yog

    2519013811K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 202623x their median

    The UFO conversation has gone from fringe to the Senate floor. @shanesmith30 and @Dan_Farah, director of @ageofdisclosure, discuss what brought about this change and the 80-year cover-up of the existence of non-human intelligent life. Full episode on YouTube. https://t.co/E9EOUGMnz5

    2745015319K viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 202616x their median

    Shane Smith is digging through the newly released UAP files ahead of his interview with "The Age of Disclosure" director @Dan_Farah Want to see what he’s looking at? Explore the same files in our @Acrobat PDF Space: https://t.co/usuICvlnYm https://t.co/QFu2ejHK6n

    541776114K viewsView on X
  • Jun 22, 202614x their median

    Did NASA photograph a UAP on the moon 54 years ago? The Pentagon recently declassified an Apollo 17 photograph from 1972 and has no official explanation for three dots in a triangular formation in the lunar sky. @Dan_Farah, director of @ageofdisclosure, explains what this means. https://t.co/mvhodW6vk1

    1712914121K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20268.1x their median

    Why the Democrats lost to Trump, according to former Republican strategist @Timodc. https://t.co/rsmdKkC76N

    10489123K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20267.8x their median

    Sean Penn has spent much of his life going places most people only experience through headlines, including wartime Kyiv alongside Volodymyr Zelenskyy. His message to everyone with strong opinions about Ukraine? Go there. https://t.co/XXq4qaBJnO

    82258216K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20265.9x their median

    Did the Civil War ever end? Former Republican strategist Tim Miller discusses how President Trump gave Republican Party voters what they always wanted. https://t.co/yWardhjSYi

    7765121K viewsView on X
  • Jun 11, 20263.6x their median

    Shane Smith and Andrew Callaghan sit down with the anonymous creator behind Explosive Media, the Iranian team whose AI-generated LEGO videos became one of the most viewed and controversial media phenomena of the recent Iran-Israel conflict. Full interview on YouTube. https://t.co/c9ejJnxSPQ

    5580112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20263.6x their median

    President Trump makes $600 million from his Trump crypto coin, while nearly one million people lose money. Ben McKenzie, an actor turned cryptocurrency critic, discusses the lack of investigation into the Trump Coin. https://t.co/7JQUjBBwBL

    30212116K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 15 interactions against 906K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.127% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 15% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 555 interactions, about 37x its own typical post.

What is VICE News's engagement rate on X?
VICE News (@VICENews) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 906,344 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, VICE News sits below the 10th percentile of the 157,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @VICENews have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @VICENews post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going