Tony Bruno Show engagement report
@TonyBrunoShow - 91K followers on X
Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 91K followers, an engagement rate of 2.21%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 171K times each, and 1.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 188.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 53K interactions, about 26x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cheezecrew, #flyeaglesfly, #intothenight.
Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026. Recurring tags: #cheezecrew, #flyeaglesfly, #intothenight.
Compared with accounts its own size
Tony Bruno Show's engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 46% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 2.21%, Tony Bruno Show sits above the 75th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.604% to 2.32%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 82% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 18% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 82% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 18% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 238 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 20, 202626x their median
Italy to ban burqas and niqabs in schools. https://t.co/ViALiacH6n
- Aug 27, 202618x their median
Gov Josh Shapiro caught in a bold-faced lie. The Lancaster County PA coroner has no record of 2 deaths from measles. https://t.co/2UbeYLmWyV
- Aug 27, 202612x their median
Two days ago, Josh Shapiro rushed to a camera to announce two "measles-associated" deaths in Pennsylvania for the first time in 30 years. He provided no other information other than two people died, they were unvaccinated, and that it was RFK Jr's fault for spreading misinformation. The Pennsylvania Department of Health has now admitted in a statement to Politico that one of the two people was a newborn infant who didn't actually die of the disease itself. Babies also don't get vaccinated for measles until they are at least 1 year old. Shapiro and the Pennsylvania Department of Health lied and this is why the credibility of public health authorities is likely never going to recover.
- Apr 4, 202613x their median
Bruce Springsteen. This is the Resistance. Old rich white liberals. https://t.co/dKqTwPuiJT
- Sep 23, 20269.6x their median
CNN went to Minnesota after Nick Shirley went mega-viral exposing the fraud there. They set up a shot of a "reporter" in hotel making phone calls. But she wasn't there to investigate fraud. She was there to try to discredit Nick Shirley. This is CNN. https://t.co/VS86CuTnbY
- Sep 22, 20264.2x their median
🚨 JEN PSAKI IN 2021: “I can absolutely ASSURE you that no one is coming into the United States of America who has not been through a THOROUGH screening and background check process.” https://t.co/3Q9DfmLaiH
- Aug 27, 20263.5x their median
JUST IN: U.S. is nearing a "historic" oil deal with Venezuela that could more than double American oil reserves. — Axios
- Aug 27, 20262.3x their median
BREAKING: U.S. Geological Survey officially renames Lake Ontario “Lake America” across all official electronic documents, with printed documents set to be updated over the next several days. https://t.co/asgYQ8Y7ae
- Aug 27, 20262.0x their median
🚨TULSI GABBARD’S LAST-DAY DATA DUMP JUST PUT MARK KELLY IN THE CROSSHAIRS — AND THERE’S A GOOD CHANCE HE WROTE THE STEELE DOSSIER HIMSELF! Follow @RedLivesMatterQ The walls are closing in from every side. Former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s data dump on her last day on the job is proving problematic for Arizona Senator Mark Kelly. Kelly was already under the microscope as one of the “Seditious Six.” Now he’s the focus of a new investigation into several Democrats and their involvement with the Russia Russia Russia hoax. According to Gabbard’s release, there’s a good chance that Kelly himself wrote the fictional Steele Dossier.Finally. Share this everywhere so the country sees what’s in that dump! Follow @mcafeenew for more drops.
- Aug 27, 2026
Spotted 👀 Trump aide Natalie Harp in the back of the Oval Office today: https://t.co/jL2HtUbUqs
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 91K followers, an engagement rate of 2.21%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 171K times each, and 1.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 188.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 53K interactions, about 26x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cheezecrew, #flyeaglesfly, #intothenight.
- What is Tony Bruno Show's engagement rate on X?
- Tony Bruno Show (@TonyBrunoShow) has an engagement rate of 2.21%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 90,682 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 2.21%, Tony Bruno Show sits above the 75th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @TonyBrunoShow have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @TonyBrunoShow post?
- Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.93 posts per day across the measured window.