Back to @TonyBabel's profile

Tony Babel engagement report

@TonyBabel - 298K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.127%
of 298K followers
Per impression
1.20%
32K views on a typical post
Reach
10.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
377
interactions (median)
Saved
0.095%
30 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.73/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 377 interactions against 298K followers, an engagement rate of 0.127%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 1.20% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 40% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 213K interactions, about 565x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026. Recurring tag: #fanartfriday.

Compared with accounts its own size

Tony Babel's engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.127%, Tony Babel sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,632 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,632 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,982 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video80% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 308 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Dec 10, 2021565x their median

    What a year ๐ŸŽจ https://t.co/P4L5Iv6SVF

    181K30K780908View on X
  • Jul 29, 2026118x their median

    The magic of animation https://t.co/NiuAJQmZRK

    42K2.7K42481.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202621x their median

    Still one of my favorites. Hell of a drug (2022). ๐Ÿ’Š https://t.co/kI0ArIr1UV

    7.4K5787212970K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20268.6x their median

    Hot Take (2025). https://t.co/TtqNzXcFbO

    3.0K21011352K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20267.1x their median

    What time is it? https://t.co/ZdtJqCtAbo

    2.5K20219347K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20264.8x their median

    Vintage Distortions. From an artwork that I almost didnโ€™t share to a series of 5 artworks that kept me going after a very tough year while having little desire to create. When I took the leap and created this experimental drop I had no idea how itโ€™ll land. 5 pieces spread across 8 month. Thatโ€™s an eternity in our space! The obligation to make these for you guys kept me from falling apart. Kept my mind busy and in the process reignited my passion to create. Actually making this year one of my most productive years. A huge thank you to everyone who took on this journey with me. You guys are proof that thereโ€™s a true love for art here. Youโ€™ve waited patiently. Collected full sets. Burned and shared the art far beyond whatever hype there was at first. Thank you!!! ๐Ÿ–ค P.s Fuck the algo.

    1.6K205451042K viewsView on X
  • Jun 28, 20264.4x their median

    Living rent free in my head. https://t.co/RAAVyXtcx7

    1.4K16458443K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20263.9x their median

    ๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿ’€ https://t.co/FkwqEepRc6

    1.3K12513232K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20263.9x their median

    Under the Influence https://t.co/Wnb79RAxie

    1.3K10722532K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20263.8x their median

    Vintage Editions. 3 years of animated loops that Iโ€™m so proud of. Poured my soul into each one of these. Canโ€™t wait to add the 4 new artworks to this collection with the new sacrifice rituals. I've spent much time refining the idea of this drop and hope it would be as fun as I Imagined. I'd be honored to have you with me through this. And would love to see some new faces. See you tomorrow!๐Ÿ–ค

    1.3K12317238K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#fanartfriday

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 377 interactions against 298K followers, an engagement rate of 0.127%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 1.20% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 40% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 213K interactions, about 565x its own typical post.

What is Tony Babel's engagement rate on X?
Tony Babel (@TonyBabel) has an engagement rate of 0.127%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 298,449 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.127%, Tony Babel sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,632 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TonyBabel have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TonyBabel post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going