Back to @TFT's profile

Teamfight Tactics engagement report

@TFT - 368K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.107%
of 368K followers
Per impression
0.555%
71K views on a typical post
Reach
19.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
393
interactions (median)
Saved
0.042%
30 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.27/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 393 interactions against 368K followers, an engagement rate of 0.107%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 71K times each, and 0.555% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 31x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #convergencefest, #tftvegasopen, #dedsafiotft.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026. Recurring tags: #convergencefest, #tftvegasopen, #dedsafiotft.

Compared with accounts its own size

Teamfight Tactics's engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 31% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.107%, Teamfight Tactics sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,839 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,839 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,058 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video80% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 229 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 17, 202631x their median

    Chan revealing he used TFT Choncc’s dance to make Mountains??????? OH MY GOD???? https://t.co/35Jt1prrew

    10K1.6K20326727K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20268.5x their median

    Who needs a Lunari arsenal when you have total relaxation? Recenter yourself with Spirit Blossom Springs Aphelios Unbound in TFT Patch 18.1. https://t.co/i2jWbyxm1k

    2.5K50584282317K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20265.8x their median

    D-PATCH UPDATE ALERT! Tonight, the team is working to get our first balance mid-patch update onto live! Here are the highlights with the details coming in our official patch notes update soon: NERFS: Cassiopeia, Master Yi, Ahri, Flora Fatalis and more BUFFS: Amumu, Soraka, Draven and more MORE: We’ve also got changes to game feel and performance targeted for tomorrow evening, also covered in the patch notes

    2.0K9215488487K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20264.3x their median

    We've received a number of bug reports on Enchanted Wilds on live that we're currently working through, including a bug where players are getting stuck in an update loop on iOS. We're working on a fix and will follow up with more information as soon as possible.

    1.3K5027670362K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20263.4x their median

    Half dragon, half chibi, all fiery retribution. Prestige Immortal Journey Shyvana takes to the skies in TFT Patch 18.1. https://t.co/RAuyzye8ol

    1.2K583029244K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.9x their median

    In an ancient forest brimming with wild magic and mysterious Wisps, even the smallest dragon can find a place to belong. Journey with Choncc into TFT’s newest set, Enchanted Wilds 🍁🌋☀️🌱 https://t.co/I2TntvyF6f

    8426821236214K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20262.9x their median

    It’s the first main patch of Enchanted Wilds and we’ve got a colossal patch full of buffs for struggling Units, Augment balance changes, and Wisp price reductions. There’s a lot to check out! Check out the changes here: 📝 https://t.co/o9IqB9m1UJ https://t.co/I8EpskMXGw

    9233714342130K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.9x their median

    We’ve just gone live with our 18.1 B patch update, focused on solving some bugs to boost performance across Mobile and PC. We’ve got more fixes to come in future patches, including a potential C-patch in the next few days, but here are a few highlights from today’s deploy: - Fixed several memory leaks impacting game performance - Fixed some load time related issues. - Finishers now abide by Global Volume/SFX settings - For the full list check out the notes: https://t.co/dxVYyYgWhD

    8324122645240K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.6x their median

    18.1 C mid-patch update is rolling out now for PC with the following changes and bug fixes: - New spinner graphic in loading screens - Reduced graphic related crashes - Mobile improvements for crashes, default quality settings, and “Update Available” issues - Memory leak fixes for various VFX that should improve performance for all platforms Double Up will be reenabled soon as all platforms have updated---expected soon. For the full list check out the notes: https://t.co/dxVYyYgWhD More quality of life + balance changes to come with Patch 18.2

    7854018828244K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.6x their median

    We're aware of a Double Up queue issue where players are getting stuck in the loading screen. For now, we're going to disable the Double Up queue and are also looking into resolutions for players currently stuck on that screen. We'll keep everyone informed, Ranked & Normal queues are still live.

    8051217832141K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#convergencefest#tftvegasopen#dedsafiotft#rbradiance#tftprocircuit

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 393 interactions against 368K followers, an engagement rate of 0.107%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 71K times each, and 0.555% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 31x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #convergencefest, #tftvegasopen, #dedsafiotft.

What is Teamfight Tactics's engagement rate on X?
Teamfight Tactics (@TFT) has an engagement rate of 0.107%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 367,643 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.107%, Teamfight Tactics sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,839 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TFT have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TFT post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going