Back to @SeharShinwari's profile

Sarah Parker engagement report

@SeharShinwari - 153K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.128%
of 153K followers
Per impression
0.561%
35K views on a typical post
Reach
22.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
195
interactions (median)
Saved
0.049%
17 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 195 interactions against 153K followers, an engagement rate of 0.128%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 0.561% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 55% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 526 interactions, about 2.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Sarah Parker's engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 29% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.128%, Sarah Parker sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.128% to 0.604%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,233 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,048 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 353 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 23, 20262.7x their median

    The era of manually building sound beds is ending. Launching: Agentic Sound Design on the invideo editor. The online invideo editor + editing agents can access all the music and sound in the world, or generate it from scratch, auto-place it on the timeline, mix + master, and build a entire sound bed that adheres to your vision and direction.

    34341529088K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.6x their median

    I’ve been testing the idea of handing an AI agent the outcome instead of micromanaging every step. That’s the workflow Qoder is built around: give it a task, and let it work through it in one workspace. https://t.co/UQkmYXZJFU

    4661816073K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20261.7x their median

    Traditional manual editing is dying. GPT-6 Astra + the invideo Editor changes the way you build your timelines - turn footage to base cuts, build cool effects and transitions, create mixed and mastered sound beds - all online, collaboratively, and using agents that let you focus on direction.

    17924439251K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20261.5x their median

    This kitten really went from innocent to full-on criminal mastermind… all for a can of tuna Flova turned a simple tuna craving into an entire GTA-style crime storyline. The mission was serious, the prize was even more serious @Flovaai https://t.co/BtFeHmCx33

    28359035K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026

    Create more, spend less with FlovaAI. From Sep 21–Oct 20, get up to 80% off and lock in these rates for 365 days: Seedance 2.5 720p — from $0.044/sec Seedance 2.5 480p — from $0.022/sec Wan 3.0 Prime — from $0.022/sec Image 2.5 — from $0.011/image Some of the lowest AI generation prices online and accross web, with 365 days to create more without worrying about the cost.

    25656038K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026

    Forgot the Winter Soldier’s trigger words? Just wake him up with a volcano instead. Much more effective. Made with @Flovaai https://t.co/90D0zy8fc6

    172320026K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    I turned a simple job interview story into a cinematic psychological mystery using @Flovaai Script to Video skill. The story starts as a normal interview, but strange CCTV footage, a familiar receptionist, and a clock stuck at 3:17 PM slowly reveal that something is seriously wrong. The best part is how the separate clips come together to feel like one continuous 60-second short film. #FlovaAI #FlovaCPP @Flovaai_Japan

    1462513012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026

    POV: You’ve mentally clocked out, but your boss suddenly says one last thing. Yeah… I was already halfway out the door. Flova gets it. @Flovaai https://t.co/2s52TdBNLk

    151113035K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026

    Created With Seedance 2.5 on @DomoAI_ This might be one of the most interesting fictional tech leaks yet. A secret prototype called PROJECT X1 was reportedly spotted inside a restricted testing lab, showing an ultra-thin seamless design, premium glass body, and an experimental interactive 3D interface that looks surprisingly believable. What starts as shaky, unauthorized-looking footage suddenly turns into a clean cinematic reveal of the device. No official announcement, no recognizable brand, just a prototype that clearly wasn’t meant to be seen yet. Would you want to see a phone like this become real?

    14406026K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026

    I turned a ridiculous “steal the golden chicken” idea into a fully playable AAA open-world mission using @Flovaai Script to Video skill. The mission starts with a normal city parade, but things quickly get chaotic when security spots you, the chase begins, and you have to jump onto a moving float to steal a giant golden chicken. The best part is how the separate gameplay moments come together to feel like one continuous 30-second game mission, complete with HUD, minimap, objectives, vehicle chase, extraction, and even a mission failure + retry screen. @Flovaai_Japan #FlovaAI #FlovaCPP

    110219018K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 195 interactions against 153K followers, an engagement rate of 0.128%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 0.561% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 55% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 526 interactions, about 2.7x its own typical post.

What is Sarah Parker's engagement rate on X?
Sarah Parker (@SeharShinwari) has an engagement rate of 0.128%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 152,717 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.128%, Sarah Parker sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SeharShinwari have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SeharShinwari post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going