Santiment Intelligence engagement report
@SantimentData - 216K followers on X
Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 216K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.2K times each, and 0.305% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video and 95% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 805 interactions, about 29x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cvsummit, #iran, #perps.
Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #cvsummit, #iran, #perps.
Compared with accounts its own size
Santiment Intelligence's engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 18% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.013%, Santiment Intelligence sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,839 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 95% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 95% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 95% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 95% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 723 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 9, 202629x their median
$XRP READY FOR A BULL RALLY 1/5 🧵👇
- Sep 23, 20268.0x their median
Chainlink’s Infosys partnership hit the feed on Sep 22 framed around 1.7 billion bank accounts. The deal names no bank and no timeline. On-chain, $LINK added 1,344 new addresses that day. 📊 Sep 22 new $LINK addresses: 1,344, down from 1,556 the day before. Sep 23 is still coming in, so a delayed response wouldn’t show yet. 🧭 That sits ~19% above the September average. Eleven days since Aug 1 still printed higher, topping out at 1,929 on Aug 21. 📈 $LINK price is up ~60% since Aug 1 and slipped ~1% on the announcement day. Average daily new addresses rose ~25% over that stretch (Aug 1 to 10 vs Sep 1 to 21). 🔒 Chainlink’s Payment Abstraction lets enterprise users settle fees in stablecoins or fiat, so bank adoption doesn’t require holding $LINK. So far, the bank-scale headline hasn’t shown up in token-scale activity. 🔗 Track LINK network growth in Sanbase: https://t.co/4QpbjUmHUq
- Aug 14, 20267.0x their median
😠 XRP negativity surged throughout this week as prices have failed to rally (so far). Crowd commentary is now at a 3-month bearish extreme across X, Reddit, Telegram, and other crypto channels. ⚡ The XRP Ledger, on the other hand, is not so quiet. $XRP just saw 49,929 active addresses in a single 24 hour span, its highest activity level in over 2 months, after earlier July activity had dropped near 2026 lows. 🧠 Now that the asset’s market value has fallen back under $1.00, expect for retail sentiment to remain ugly. But with on-chain activity high, this is the counter-signal bulls want to see. Fear is loud. Participation is rising. If XRP holds structure and demand returns, today’s negativity could become tomorrow’s discounted entry narrative. 🔗 Live Chart: https://t.co/bKEe4NJlNc
- Aug 17, 20265.6x their median
$LINK’s leverage is back above where it stood going into the crash. The price isn’t. Standard Chartered opened coverage last week with a staged $200-by-2030 target. LINK’s spot reaction was muted, down on the day the note landed. The derivatives book moved instead. 📈 Coin-denominated open interest sits near 29M LINK, back above its October 9 level for the first time since the October 10 liquidation cascade. 🔀 In dollar terms OI is still only about half of pre-crash, roughly $279M against ~$555M, because LINK trades ~57% below its October price. 📊 Funding has stayed positive every day through the buildup, so the added open interest skews long. 🧭 Still short of the August 2025 peak near 34M coins. A rebuild, not a new extreme. The analyst call set the target. The order book set the leverage. 🔗 Explore LINK’s Open Interest in Sanbase: https://t.co/ceUAwtBEVB (researched with Santiment MCP + Claude)
- Aug 13, 20264.9x their median
🪦 Crypto “dead” chatter is rising again. Words like dead, dying, over, ended, ending, and finished are gaining traction across X, Reddit, Telegram, and other crypto channels. 😨 This is fear language. It usually appears when retail patience is breaking, prices feel stuck, and traders start treating temporary weakness like permanent failure. 🧠 Crypto markets often move hardest against the crowd when the crowd becomes too certain that upside is gone. When “crypto is dead” talk rises while Bitcoin holds key levels, stronger hands keep accumulating, and forced sellers fade, the setup often becomes more attractive for patient buyers. 🔗 Live Dashboard: https://t.co/3VxTP9VCOZ
- Sep 28, 20264.6x their median
$QNT’s Clearing House news broke on Thursday. Most of its on-chain crowd showed up on Sunday. 🆕 New addresses hit 7,516 on Sep 27, about 55x their Sep 1 to 15 weekday average. On the Sep 24 announcement day they were 351. 📊 Active addresses reached 14,458 on Sep 27, about 19x the same baseline, up from 2,064 on Sep 24. 📈 Price rose about 300% from the Sep 23 close to Sep 27, and most of that gain came after Sep 24. 🔀 Dollar open interest rose nearly 9x over those four days. Measured in QNT, it rose about 2.2x, so most of the dollar jump is price. What we still don’t know: why the wave landed two to three days after the headline. We found no new catalyst for Sep 26 or 27. These token metrics also can’t tell us whether banks will use Quant’s network. 🔗 Explore QNT new addresses in Sanbase: https://t.co/WmVyfMNQdO
- Sep 22, 20264.4x their median
$NEAR seems to be the second entrant into the privacy narrative that has been recently mostly centered around $ZEC. This is the case that the new insight in Sanbase makes, with three numbers from the data behind it. 📈 $NEAR gained 81% from Sep 13 to Sep 20, around the Sep 17 confidential perps launch. 🧭 Open interest in dollars rose 119% over that week. In NEAR terms, it rose 21%. 📊 Funding reached 1.6x its two-month median on Sep 20. Two ordinary days earlier in the same window were already at that level. The read is that the metrics are not diverging hard enough to call exhaustion, but this is no longer early. In coin terms, this is a 21% week. 🔗 Read the full piece in Sanbase: https://t.co/jlnomAC5Fv
- Aug 13, 20263.8x their median
$XRP just closed at its lowest since November 2024, and the on-chain read is more interesting than the price. 📉 Price closed at ~$1.00 on Aug 12, the lowest daily close since Nov 2024 and roughly 69% below the January 2025 peak near $3.30. 📊 Activity picked up anyway. Active addresses averaged ~35,700 a day in August against ~26,400 through July, up roughly a third, with Aug 11 the busiest day since Jun 5. 🆕 But new addresses are flat: ~2,260 a day in August versus ~2,270 in July. No new-user wave at all. 🧭 So the “rising user activity” framing is half right. The existing base is transacting more, and the wallet count is not growing with it. Activity is up. The user base is not. (researched with Santiment MCP + Claude)
- Sep 2, 20263.7x their median
Memecoin chains are on everyone’s watch. New wallets are actually appearing elsewhere: Ethereum-based DeFi. 📊 New-address growth, past week vs the first half of August: 🦄 $UNI +87%. 👻 $AAVE +46%. 🔗 $LINK +43%. ◎ $SOL +32%. Ξ $ETH −8%. 🧭 Let’s look at the pattern. New wallets grow the fastest on Ethereum DeFi tokens, while Ethereum itself, the settlement chain, is the only one here with fewer new wallets than three weeks ago. ⚠️ The obvious caveat: new addresses are cheap and easy to create. Some of this is incentive-driven wallets, not actual net-new users. Ranking is ranking anyway. ☝️ Headlines go to chains, wallets go to apps. 🔗 Explore new-address growth across assets in Sanbase: https://t.co/PYYUYAQXS1
- Oct 1, 20263.6x their median
😬 Ethereum and XRP sentiment has suddenly turned very negative to kick off October. $ETH is down to 0.89 bullish comments per bearish comment across X, Telegram, Reddit, and other social platforms. This is its lowest ratio since June 7. $XRP sits at just 0.67, its lowest since August 17. 📉 A ratio below 1.0 means negative commentary is the MAJORITY across X, Reddit, Telegram, and other crypto communities. Santiment’s sentiment metrics are designed to capture exactly these shifts in crowd emotion, especially when conversation becomes unusually one-sided, as it is now for these two top-cap altcoins. 🛒 Heavy pessimism can create a useful contrarian setup. When traders become convinced prices are heading lower, much of the panic selling may already have happened. Our social analysis has repeatedly shown that quieter optimism and stronger fear can create more attractive entry conditions than obvious “buy the dip” excitement. 🔭 This doesn’t guarantee ETH or XRP immediately bounce. But the mood is now very different from periods when everyone expected prices to keep climbing. Fear is returning while some underlying market signals remain healthy, which is exactly the kind of divergence contrarian traders typically wait patiently for. 🔗 Live Chart: https://t.co/vEooWr7dCZ
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 216K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.2K times each, and 0.305% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video and 95% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 805 interactions, about 29x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cvsummit, #iran, #perps.
- What is Santiment Intelligence's engagement rate on X?
- Santiment Intelligence (@SantimentData) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 42 original posts from the last 30 days against 215,827 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.013%, Santiment Intelligence sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,839 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @SantimentData have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @SantimentData post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.