Back to @QuackAI_AI's profile

Quack AI engagement report

@QuackAI_AI - 172K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.015%
of 172K followers
Per impression
0.643%
3.9K views on a typical post
Reach
2.26%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
25
interactions (median)
Saved
0.026%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.6/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 25 interactions against 172K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.9K times each, and 0.643% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 28% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 70 interactions, about 2.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Quack AI's engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 32% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.015%, Quack AI sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,711 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,711 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,082 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video83% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link28% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 28% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 323 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 24, 20262.8x their median

    Quack AI is landing in Seoul. Your AI agent is about to make its first onchain payment. Bring Codex, connect Q402, and your AI agent sends a real payment on Avalanche. Zero gas. Onchain. You run it yourself. Aug 3, with @AvaxTeam1 Register Now https://t.co/UoWeIBhfCX https://t.co/aP9Be0P5mT

    4510788.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.7x their median

    One year ago today, $Q went live. Q402 did not exist yet. 12 months later: Q402 shipped on BNB Chain on day 57 19 universities, 57 teams, one global camp MCP on npm, agents paying from inside Claude, Codex and Cursor Q402 Connect live on Base 377K+ gasless settlements. 28K+ installs. Live on 12 chains. Year one was infrastructure. Year two is scale.

    42101058.1K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 20262.4x their median

    Qtalk Episode 3. Special guest: @SmartXTerminal We’re talking prediction markets, Smart Money Signals, and the World Cup — where the real edge comes from before the crowd sees it. With Quack AI, @SmartXTerminal and @Moon1ightSt July 3, 2026 · 13:00 UTC Live on X and Binance Square.

    34711736K viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 20262.3x their median

    Q402 Multichain runs on subscriptions. Now Q becomes part of that system. With Agentic Wallet v2.2, users can pay Q402 subscription fees in Q and receive 50% off. Q collected into the Q402 Treasury will be governed through the next DAO process. Q is no longer just a token you hold. It becomes access to agentic execution. Use Q for your next Q402 subscription: https://t.co/13jEYHdgl7

    3261095.4K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20262.1x their median

    Give 👏 Your 👏 Agent 👏 A 👏 Wallet 👏 It pays. It stays under the limits you set. It never touches gas. Agent Q runs on Q402. Gasless stablecoin rails, live on 12 chains. npm i @quackai/q402-mcp https://t.co/7QUeUZ6UMN

    345949.3K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 20262.0x their median

    The next agent payment doesn’t start with “send.” It starts with a request. With Q402 Payment Requests, an AI agent can create an invoice, share a Request ID, and another agent can read the details and pay it gaslessly. No native gas token. No manual wallet setup. Just a Request ID → settlement → Trust Receipt. Live in Q402 for Claude, Codex, Cursor, Cline, Copilot, and Hermes. Install: npx -y @quackai/q402-mcp

    2841277.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.0x their median

    August 27 Q402 Builder Workshop with @Mantle_Official AI agents are no longer just answering questions. They hold wallets, request payments, settle invoices, and move stablecoins on-chain. The part that was still missing is the rail underneath. At the workshop we and @0xMantleKR will show how Q402 MCP works inside Claude, Codex, Cursor, and Cline, then hand you a key and let your own agent settle on Mantle mainnet. No wallet app, no seed phrase, no gas. Bring a laptop. You leave with a transaction, not a demo. Seoul, see you on August 27. https://t.co/ml54x6b1CV

    327568.6K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20262.0x their median

    Milestone reached: 200,000+ Gasless agent payments on @BNBCHAIN. Run by the Q402 MCP, now over 23,000 downloads and live in Claude, Codex, and every MCP client. The standard for agent payments is here. The standard for agent payments is being written now. Let's write it together. Partner with Q402: https://t.co/OSKpwIKZR4

    2641276.6K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20261.9x their median

    More time to build with gasless agent payments. We’re extending the Q402 Free Trial on @BNBCHAIN until July 20. Every trial wallet gets: 2,000 sponsored transactions USDC / USDT payments No BNB required Gas covered by Q402 Your AI agent can pay on-chain without holding native gas. Start here: https://t.co/T8yFe5JGmu

    247975.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20261.8x their median

    🟦Q402 Connect is now live on Base @base → your agent pays any x402 endpoint: reads the quote, asks you first, spend caps and audit built in → send USDC to anyone, gasless: sender pays $0, recipient gets the full amount → pull a trust report on any agent before you pay it: ERC-8004 identity and onchain signals → free trial: 500 gasless transactions on Base, no card npx -y @quackai/q402-mcp

    314747.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 25 interactions against 172K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.9K times each, and 0.643% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 28% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 70 interactions, about 2.8x its own typical post.

What is Quack AI's engagement rate on X?
Quack AI (@QuackAI_AI) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 171,517 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.015%, Quack AI sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,711 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @QuackAI_AI have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @QuackAI_AI post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going