• • • engagement report
@QCWorldwide - 125K followers on X
Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 609 interactions against 125K followers, an engagement rate of 0.487%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 6.8K times each, and 8.91% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 19x its own typical post.
Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
• • •'s engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 96% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.487%, • • • sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.127% to 0.604%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.127% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 60% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 170 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 7, 202019x their median
NICKI MINAJ JUST LIKED MY TWEEEET AND FOLLOWED ME WTFFFF
- Sep 12, 20266.5x their median
😍😍😍😍😍 https://t.co/cAIFSfFxHO
- Sep 22, 20265.4x their median
Like I literally do not care what y’all have to say about Nicki Minaj. Idgaf about her brother, husband, trump, MAGA none of it. Let that register in your heads. I’ll support her through it all and there’s nothing you or that keyboard is going to do. Your performative activism online I want no parts. Name calling doesn’t work on this side either.
- Sep 20, 20265.0x their median
Using straps to keep your ass from dropping is CRAZY work ☹️
- Sep 11, 20264.6x their median
They said we were using old pics of Nicki, just for us to get new pics less than 48 hrs later. FROM GETTY 🫵🏾😭😂
- Sep 22, 20264.1x their median
Good morning to those of us who still Support Nicki Minaj 🍻
- Sep 11, 20263.7x their median
You gotta understand the whole “you gotta use old pics of Nicki” is a cope response to the fact that they can’t use old pics. Can’t put pics side by side. You run the risk of seeing 2 different people I get it 🤣
- Sep 10, 20263.7x their median
Nicki Minaj back in the Top 3 on Global Spotify 🫵🏾🫵🏾🫵🏾🫵🏾🫵🏾🫵🏾😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
- Sep 26, 20263.5x their median
Her knowing y’all mad and her not giving a single fuck 😭😭😭☹️
- Sep 19, 20263.5x their median
Y’all still on here tryna get people to stop liking Nicki Minaj? Lmao not working.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 609 interactions against 125K followers, an engagement rate of 0.487%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 6.8K times each, and 8.91% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.46% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 19x its own typical post.
- What is • • •'s engagement rate on X?
- • • • (@QCWorldwide) has an engagement rate of 0.487%, based on the median interactions across 55 original posts from the last 30 days against 125,106 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.487%, • • • sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @QCWorldwide have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @QCWorldwide post?
- Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.