OdailyNews engagement report
@OdailyChina - 73K followers on X
Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 13, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 26 interactions against 73K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.3K times each, and 0.598% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 620 interactions, about 24x its own typical post.
Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 13, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
OdailyNews's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 26% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.035%, OdailyNews sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 69% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 31% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 69% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 31% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 229 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 3, 202624x their median
https://t.co/CxhOR9fjJO
- Sep 9, 202622x their median
这是一封写给币安社区和管理团队的信。 我感觉现在交易所上线的新币实在太多了。 曾几何时，一个项目能够上线币安，是非常难得的事情，甚至可以说是“千载难逢”。每一次币安上币，都会让整个社区感到兴奋，也代表着一种真正的认可。 但现在，几乎每天都会有新的 Alpha 项目上线，而且大约 75% 的 Alpha 项目最终都会进入合约或现货市场。随着上币速度越来越快，那种原本属于币安上币的稀缺性、真实性和含金量，也正在慢慢被削弱。 如果拿 Robinhood 来做对比，他们目前只上线了一个代币——Cash Cat。也正因为这种稀缺性，整个生态围绕它迎来了一个巨大的高光时刻，真正做到了从无到有。 我真心希望币安能够适当放慢上币的速度，把更多注意力放在项目和社区的真实性上，把机会留给那些真正拥有真实文化、真实用户和强大社区，并且真正值得被币安认可的项目。 有时候，少即是多。 希望币安能够守住“上线币安”这件事本身所代表的价值和意义。
- Sep 6, 202610x their median
BREAKING: Liquid Network says purported white-hat hackers withdrew roughly 4,000 BTC ($320 million) from its federation wallet, prompting a network pause. Their onchain message: "we are whitehats. contact us on chain." Blockstream is working to contact them. https://t.co/BChtxs0XV0
- Sep 11, 20266.2x their median
我之前说过我有个网店项目，其实是卖枪（合法） 现在这个网店因为业务比较平稳，来订单就自动转发给仓库发货就行了，我就没什么精力放在上面。 前两年一直想给每把枪建模，然后给网站来一次大重构，找人问了下，3D建模一把枪要大几万，网站重新设计也要大几十万，我们几百个 SPU，ROI 太低，于是作罢。 前两天看到 Astra 的 Blender 渲染，拍两张照就能给模型渲染出来，大受震撼，让工厂里的兄弟帮忙拍点照我试一下，结果效果很一般。 让 Astra 给了一些优化方向，给了一个 SOP 但又感觉太麻烦了，现在在测试如何最低限度的照片能够完成精细度最高的建模。 等这一波完成了准备给我的枪店来一次大重构。
- Sep 4, 20264.4x their median
Robinhood chain 开始堵车了。
- Sep 7, 20264.1x their median
原来是故人啊🤝深度复盘两个CEO的关注能多少钱？ 五年前的旧账被同一个人将战场从纽交所搬到了自己的链上 1️⃣ $MEME（A Meme Coin） Robinhood币股meme代币玩法的集大成者 叙事极其精准：AMC 从来不是 American Multi-Cinema，而是 A Meme Coin。 导火索是 AMC CEO Adam Aron @CEOAdam 公开怒骂 Robinhood @RobinhoodCrypto 未经授权就把 AMC 做成代币，要求立即停止并威胁找外部证券律师和 SEC。 Vlad Tenev @vladtenev 只回了四个字：“What’s the concern?” 当下这场对线直接把 $MEME 从几百万市值几小时拉到150M峰值，然后回落到 45M 万左右。 过了两天 Vlad 亲自 follow 了官方账号@amemecoinrh，社区立刻把这解读成“自己人认账”。市值从低位34M直接拉上新高插针至250M附近，整整拉了将近4倍 而这不是第一次两人交手。2021 年 GameStop/AMC 逼空期间，Robinhood 曾限制散户买入AMC，引发集体诉讼和国会听证，Vlad 当时公开道歉过。 五年后同一批人、同一只股票，战场从纽交所搬到了自己的链上。Aron 当年靠散户救了公司，现在散户用 meme 币继续“消费”AMC 这个符号，而 Vlad 选择 follow 这个符号，形成了极强的叙事闭环。 2️⃣ $BONER 的路径更“工程化” 主池直接对 tokenized HIMS。Hims & Hers 卖 ED 药和减肥针，所以叫 BONER、“Hard Money”，一切都对得上。 它更早一步把大量 tokenized HIMS 锁进池子（高峰时锁了 50-80% 的链上浮动），周末纽交所休市无法增发新代币时，链上 HIMS 代币一度打到 132 美元，而真实股价周五收盘才 28 美元左右，出现了教科书级的“周末浮动挤压”。 defiprime.comHIMS CEO Andrew Dudum @AndrewDudum 关注@bonercoinlong之后，市值从大约 2600 万直接拉到 8000 万以上（接近 3 倍） 社区普遍认为 Dudum 的关注比 Vlad 的关注“含金量”更高——因为这可能被解读成上市公司对“用 meme 做营销甚至挤压空头”的默许，HIMS 本身空头比例就不低。 这就是链上的注意力经济学🧐🧐那么散户又能做些什么抓住这些大金的币股meme呢？ 先说这类能从几百万打到几千万、上亿的标的，同时具备几个特征： ✅标的股票本身有meme基因或高空头比例（AMC是2021年老兵，HIMS空头不低）。 ✅出现「利益相关方」动作：上市公司CEO开喷、Robinhood CEO回应、或者CEO直接follow官方号。 ✅流动性极薄（一两百万美金级别），但叙事能瞬间吸引注意力。 ✅最好卡在周末或节假日，传统市场休市、股票代币无法增发的时候，链上浮动容易被挤压。 再说P小将们怎么做 第一，盯新池子 第二，把X当成情报源，而不是情绪源 🚨重点监控： ·符合上述特征的上市公司CEO账号 ·和Robinhood相关账号 ·新上线的meme官方号有没有被相关企业高管follow 第三，看链上结构 打开池子看两件事： ·股票代币有多少被锁在meme池里（占比越高，周末越容易出现价格错位） ·前十持仓和早期钱包集中度（太集中，拉盘后砸盘会很快） 第四，分清「叙事成立」和「还能买」 $MEME的叙事是「AMC从来就是A Meme Coin」+ 五年前旧账重演。 $BONER的叙事是「Hard Money」+ 锁浮动挤压。 叙事成立不代表现在这个价位还值得追。CEO follow之后的第一根大阳线，往往是最大成交量和最大分歧同时出现的位置。 最后说心态 链上p小将最容易犯的错，是把「我看到了这个故事」当成「我应该满仓这个币」。 现在的玩法只是把战场从纽交所搬到了Robinhood自己的链上，规则没变：注意力来得快，走得也快；相关CEO按一下关注，比上所还管用；但热度一过，没有基本面托底的东西会跌得很快。 能抓到大的，靠的是足够早 + 足够小仓 + 舍得走。 先活下来，再谈抓住大金狗。🙏
- Sep 6, 20263.0x their median
买美股、黄金、白银、原油，首选 Bitget TradFi合约！ https://t.co/krCqo444WZ
- Sep 2, 20262.4x their median
8月，Bitget TradFi永续合约再创佳绩： → 交易笔数达2.5 亿笔 → 活跃交易者环比增长12% → 连续两个月交易量突破1,000 亿美元 更多交易者、更高交易量、更多市场机会。 增长势不可挡！🚀 https://t.co/ThfthH05cd
- Sep 11, 20262.3x their median
买美股、黄金、白银、原油，首选 Bitget TradFi合约！
- Sep 1, 20262.3x their median
Robinhood Chain新币 $UBIK 市值冲至480万美元，疑似aixbt @aixbt_agent 创始人钱包买入获利近10万美元未卖出 9月2日凌晨，Robinhood Chain新发行meme代币UBIK 价格报0.00448美元，市值约480万美元。代币开盘后快速拉升，社区将涨幅主要归因于“aixbt开发者买入”叙事。 (该地址前缀与 Virtuals 上 AIXBT 发射方 0x8DFb...9f59 一致，因此被解读为 “aixbt 开发者 0rxbt @0rxbt 进场”) ·三笔买入合计约 392 美元 ·买入时市值分别约 1.16万 / 2.71万 / 47.1万美元 ·持仓约 2060万枚（100% 未卖） ·持有约 39 分钟时浮盈接近 9.8万美元，收益率超过24564.4% 不过随后aixbt_agent（AI账号） @aixbt_agent 在评论区回应：未购买该代币、不控制相关钱包地址、团队不部署代币。有用户据此认为UBIK存在“蹭热度”或骗局嫌疑。 ⚠️此事正值X平台出现大规模异常密码重置邮件事件（9月1日数千加密圈账号收到非本人发起的重置请求）。 🚨还有需要注意的一点是 此前2025年3月份，AIXBT就曾被盗约 55.5 ETH，不过当时被盗的资金是BASE链。钱包地址为：0xea36d66f0AC9928b358400309a8dFbC43A973a35 买入 $UBIK 的地址为 ：0x8dfb37aae4f8fcbd1f90015a9e75b48f50fd9f59
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 26 interactions against 73K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.3K times each, and 0.598% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 620 interactions, about 24x its own typical post.
- What is OdailyNews's engagement rate on X?
- OdailyNews (@OdailyChina) has an engagement rate of 0.035%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 73,389 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.035%, OdailyNews sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @OdailyChina have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @OdailyChina post?
- Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.33 posts per day across the measured window.