Back to @NewEarthquake's profile

Earthquakes engagement report

@NewEarthquake - 917K followers on X

Measured over 127 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.013%
of 917K followers
Per impression
0.685%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
1.88%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
118
interactions (median)
Saved
0.017%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.47/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 118 interactions against 917K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 127 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.685% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 127 posts sampled, 72% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 98% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 820 interactions, about 6.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 127 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Earthquakes's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 40% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, Earthquakes sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,596 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,596 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,062 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video72% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link98% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 72% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 98% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 156 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 14, 20266.9x their median

    M7.7 earthquake πŸ”΄ - 68 km NNW of Ende, Indonesia Aug 15 05:58 local time (22m ago) Depth 10 km https://t.co/gKFlxSJdZp https://t.co/z7VADbaGZ8

    518250124079K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20266.0x their median

    M6.9 earthquake 🟠 - 7 km NNW of Pematangsiantar, Indonesia Aug 15 17:54 local time (18m ago) Depth 183 km https://t.co/LgRnmAPmSL https://t.co/f5Ksqm8kFU

    51716391753K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20264.8x their median

    Preliminary: M7.1 earthquake πŸ”΄ - Kumamoto Region, Kumamoto Prefecture Jul 28 16:27 local time (6m ago) Depth 10 km Source: JMA https://t.co/b56MfHgtEX

    374162261046K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20264.6x their median

    M7.7 Ende, Indonesia earthquake fault rupture slip from USGS in the NewQuake app: https://t.co/5NTnGAsUgd https://t.co/BblEoQYdse

    4351036347K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20264.2x their median

    Preliminary: M6.1 earthquake 🟠 - Minahasa, Sulawesi, Indonesia Aug 16 00:25 local time (6m ago) Depth 51 km Source: EMSC https://t.co/qL8r9t5Llw

    35711391334K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20263.7x their median

    M6.6 earthquake 🟠 - 115 km NNE of Teluknaga, Indonesia Sep 12 04:23 local time (18m ago) Depth 359 km https://t.co/Oz4j7gv3Q1 https://t.co/PxnnT1AJzm

    3091184833K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20263.4x their median

    M6.7 earthquake 🟠 - 38 km NW of Upahuacho, Peru Aug 20 13:00 local time (16m ago) Depth 67 km https://t.co/5oWboTqBey https://t.co/b96LbYrUqq

    27910571033K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20263.3x their median

    M5.8 earthquake - 4 km NNW of Toride, Japan Aug 23 02:00 local time (19m ago) Depth 78 km https://t.co/aJjNo5FNza https://t.co/Cs8y5LdwZf

    280973429K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20263.1x their median

    M7.7 Indonesia earthquake and first likely aftershocks: https://t.co/BmkR9DOSGG https://t.co/S7xlwy9yrg

    2481105439K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.0x their median

    M6 earthquake 🟠 - 33 km SSW of Honchō, Japan Aug 23 22:44 local time (21m ago) Depth 43 km https://t.co/9Snem4CfRh https://t.co/tKBkVEf8mD

    248975628K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 118 interactions against 917K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 127 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.685% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 127 posts sampled, 72% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 98% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 820 interactions, about 6.9x its own typical post.

What is Earthquakes's engagement rate on X?
Earthquakes (@NewEarthquake) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 127 original posts from the last 30 days against 916,575 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, Earthquakes sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,596 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NewEarthquake have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NewEarthquake post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going