Back to @NeuralSpaceIO's profile

Neural Space engagement report

@NeuralSpaceIO - 173K followers on X

Measured over 43 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.023%
of 173K followers
Per impression
0.707%
5.5K views on a typical post
Reach
3.20%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
39
interactions (median)
Saved
0.072%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.43/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 39 interactions against 173K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 43 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.5K times each, and 0.707% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 43 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 42% are part of a thread and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

Measured over 43 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Neural Space's engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.023%, Neural Space sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,890 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.605%
p902.32%
p9983.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,890 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,041 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.605%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link12% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 12% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 550 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 5, 202636x their median

    🇨🇳🫁🇩🇪 FLASH || Réfugiée en Allemagne, Zhang Qi accuse l’hôpital affilié n°1 de l’université de Zhengzhou de lui avoir retiré le poumon gauche sans consentement éclairé. https://t.co/YWzgMjP9qZ

    1.4K1430745K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20262.5x their median

    🇬🇧⚖️ IL N'A RIEN MANGÉ PENDANT 382 JOURS. IL A PERDU 125 KILOS ET IL N'EST PAS MORT. Il a 27 ans et il pèse 207 kilos. Il travaille dans le fish and chips de son père, en Écosse. Il se présente à l'hôpital de Dundee pour demander de l'aide. Les médecins acceptent un jeûne court. Quelques jours, pour amorcer. Il ne s'arrêtera pas avant un an et dix-sept jours. Pendant 382 jours, il ne mange rien. Ce qu'il consomme : de l'eau, du thé, du café noir, de l'eau gazeuse. Des multivitamines. De la levure, pour les acides aminés. Un peu de potassium et de sodium au début. Et c'est tout. Le souci ? Il ne reste pas à l'hôpital. Il rentre chez lui et vit normalement. Il revient seulement en consultation pour les prises de sang. Ce que ces prises de sang montrent est la partie la plus troublante. Sur les huit derniers mois, sa glycémie tourne autour de 1,7 millimole par litre. En dessous de 3,9, on parle d'hypoglycémie. À 1,7, un adulte normal convulse ou tombe dans le coma. Lui marche, parle et fait ses courses. Parce que son corps est passé en cétose. Privé de sucre, il a démonté ses propres réserves de graisse et fabriqué des corps cétoniques, que le cerveau brûle à la place du glucose. Avec 207 kilos au départ, le carburant ne manquait pas. Autre détail : jusqu'à 48 jours entre deux selles. Le 11 juillet 1966, à dix heures du matin, il prend son premier repas. Un œuf à la coque et une tranche de pain beurré. Sa phrase : j'avais oublié le goût de la nourriture. C'est bien passé. Je me sens un peu plein mais j'ai vraiment adoré. Il pèse 82 kilos. Il en a perdu 125. Cinq ans plus tard, il en pèse 89. Il n'en a repris que sept, ce qui est exceptionnel. Il s'appelait Angus Barbieri. Il est mort en 1990, à 51 ans, d'une maladie sans rapport. Son record tient toujours. Aujourd'hui : • Le cas a été publié dans le Postgraduate Medical Journal en 1973 • Le jeûne total prolongé a depuis été abandonné comme traitement de l'obésité : arythmies mortelles, troubles électrolytiques, syndrome de renutrition • Les médecins déconseillent d'aller au-delà de quarante jours • Le Guinness ne valide plus les records de jeûne Et le détail qui change tout : s'il a survécu, c'est précisément parce qu'il partait de 207 kilos. Le même protocole sur un corps normal tue en quelques semaines. (Angus Barbieri, Tayport, Écosse ; jeûne du 14 juin 1965 au 30 juin 1966 ; Maryfield Hospital, Dundee ; Stewart et Fleming, Postgraduate Medical Journal, 1973)

    82122020K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20262.5x their median

    🐆🇧🇴🔬 FLASH INFO || Des scientifiques confirment Leopardus tilcayo, la première nouvelle espèce de félin formellement décrite depuis plus d’un siècle, dans la forêt des Yungas en Bolivie. Un chaton remis à un refuge comme « chat bizarre » appartient à une lignée distincte, plus petite qu’un chat domestique et séparée des autres chats-tigres depuis environ 1,4 million d’années selon l’analyse génomique.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ ___ https://t.co/BVOMPT6Cn8

    8111317.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20261.9x their median

    🌳🌲👀 EN IMAGES || Certains arbres poussent avec des jambes, un torse et des bras levés, au point de sembler tout droit sortis de la Terre du Milieu. Leurs silhouettes humaines, nées de la croissance naturelle, forcent le regard à s’arrêter net. https://t.co/iX6cy7YgZo

    714105.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20261.9x their median

    🇮🇸🦌📸 EN IMAGES || Caché derrière un rocher en Islande, le photographe Anton Freyr Birgisson voit un troupeau de rennes sauvages s’approcher à quelques mètres de lui. Un mâle aux imposants bois le fixe un instant avant de repartir avec le groupe. https://t.co/D1nFbiwyff

    712006.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20261.8x their median

    🌋🏨🇹🇷 EN IMAGES || Creusé dans la roche volcanique de Cappadoce, cet hôtel troglodyte descend bien sous le niveau du sol, jusqu'à un bassin rouge baptisé « Inferno ». https://t.co/UJ808TnNQn

    596515.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20261.8x their median

    🇮🇪🌊😱 INSOLITE || Terrifié par le vide, un père rampe à plat ventre jusqu’au bord d’une falaise des îles d’Aran pour affronter l’Atlantique. https://t.co/fkYbPLK7Dz

    623328.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20261.8x their median

    🕷️💧🌸 INSOLITE || Une araignée sauteuse semble porter une fleur sur la tête. En réalité, une goutte d’eau agit comme une lentille et forme l’image de la fleur située derrière elle. — David Narváez https://t.co/1LJNq4V50P

    616024.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20261.7x their median

    🇺🇸🚁👵 INSOLITE || Après une chute au Piestewa Peak, Katalin Metro, 74 ans, est hélitreuillée malgré son refus. Le câble anti-rotation cède : le panier part en vrille. Elle gagne 450 000 $ pour régler l’affaire. https://t.co/MJuwzGrGWZ

    5069013K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20261.6x their median

    🦈👩🔧 EN IMAGES || Une femme s’agenouille sur le sable, immobilise la tête d’un requin tout juste sorti de l’eau et retire l’hameçon coincé dans sa gueule. Certaines femmes sont tout simplement construites différemment. https://t.co/Y9jf7mdlUj

    547104.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 39 interactions against 173K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 43 original posts, its engagement rate beats 32% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.5K times each, and 0.707% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 43 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 42% are part of a thread and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

What is Neural Space's engagement rate on X?
Neural Space (@NeuralSpaceIO) has an engagement rate of 0.023%, based on the median interactions across 43 original posts from the last 30 days against 172,683 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.023%, Neural Space sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,890 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NeuralSpaceIO have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 32% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NeuralSpaceIO post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going