Back to @LynexFi's profile

Lynex engagement report

@LynexFi - 72K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 14, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.023%
of 72K followers
Per impression
0.959%
1.7K views on a typical post
Reach
2.38%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
16
interactions (median)
Saved
0.029%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.67/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 72K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.7K times each, and 0.959% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26 interactions, about 1.6x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 14, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lynex's engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.023%, Lynex sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,596 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.127%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,596 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,062 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 294 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 20261.6x their median

    Your veLYNX voting power isn't static. It decays linearly as your lock approaches its unlock date. A 2-year lock starts at maximum power. After one year, it's at roughly 50%. Near expiry, it's close to zero. https://t.co/Qlv3bU4yYh

    183502.0K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 2026

    Lynex hosts a competitive ALM marketplace. Gamma, Ichi, and Steer each deploy concentrated liquidity strategies on the same pools. Different range approaches, different rebalance logic, different performance profiles. You choose which manager to deposit with based on their track record, strategy type, and the pair you're providing liquidity for.

    152512.3K viewsView on X
  • Jun 28, 2026

    Three voting modes on Lynex. Here's when to use each: Manual: you have time to research gauges weekly and want full multi-gauge control. Auto-vote: you have a single pool you believe in and want zero-effort consistency. Delegation: you want professional multi-gauge allocation without the work.

    133706.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 2026

    When you lock LYNX, you receive a veNFT. This veNFT represents your locked position — your voting power, your lock duration, and your share of fees and bribes. It's a transferable, on-chain asset that proves your governance stake. https://t.co/NCDbr86urC

    170312.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    Your veLYNX veNFT isn't just a governance tool. It's a portfolio asset. It earns yield every epoch through fees and bribes. Its value compounds when you re-lock earnings. It represents a growing claim on protocol revenue. https://t.co/AqwyAPBYDb

    153201.8K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 2026

    Epoch 121 Recap $1.1M in trading volume and $736 in rewards shared with veLYNX voters. Average voting APR hit 3.01, keeping the momentum strong. A fresh epoch begins — time to lock, vote, and earn anew. https://t.co/L78X9lmEKM

    113605.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    There are two approaches to Lynex: set-and-forget and active. Set-and-forget: lock veLYNX, enable auto-vote or delegate, compound when you remember. Minimal effort, consistent baseline returns. Active: manually vote each epoch, chase the best bribes, manage CL positions, rebalance ranges. Higher ceiling, more time required.

    161201.6K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 2026

    Epoch 123 is here! Epoch 122 fades away as a new round begins. veLYNX voters, your rewards are waiting—go claim them. → https://t.co/s6XbCZpXSp https://t.co/ghkN2TekIU

    104506.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    One large veLYNX veNFT or several smaller ones? There are trade-offs. One large: simpler management, easier compounding, single vote allocation. Multiple: flexibility to vote on different gauges independently, ability to delegate or transfer parts separately, option to run mixed strategies.

    151112.4K viewsView on X
  • Jun 24, 2026

    Epoch 122 is almost over! ⏰ Just 24 hours left before the flip Make sure to: • Cast your votes • Lock your LYNX for the next round • Delegate if you prefer letting others handle it Don’t miss your chance → https://t.co/yxVh080IcF https://t.co/FIvevuSwjy

    121506.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 72K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.7K times each, and 0.959% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26 interactions, about 1.6x its own typical post.

What is Lynex's engagement rate on X?
Lynex (@LynexFi) has an engagement rate of 0.023%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 71,987 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.023%, Lynex sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,596 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @LynexFi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @LynexFi post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going