Back to @Linkiesta's profile

Linkiesta engagement report

@Linkiesta - 301K followers on X

Measured over 64 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 18, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 301K followers
Per impression
0.461%
1.1K views on a typical post
Reach
0.36%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.7/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 301K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 64 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.1K times each, and 0.461% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 64 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 82 interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

Measured over 64 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 18, 2026. Recurring tag: #torino.

Compared with accounts its own size

Linkiesta's engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 27% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, Linkiesta sits below the 10th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,102 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,052 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video2% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 2% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 151 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 4, 202616x their median

    Tovarich Salvini È tempo di fare chiarezza sul patto della Lega con il partito di Putin Di @igorilicboni e @FedeValcauda https://t.co/Zf8rNsHIDM via @Linkiesta

    6319001.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202614x their median

    The Story siamo noi Ranucci, Obama, e il talento che ci vuole a saper stare al mondo Di @lasoncini https://t.co/sDNlp37ORN via @Linkiesta

    5214203.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202611x their median

    Scontro di imbecillità Macklemore, Sheeran, e quelli convinti che la libertà valga solo per Coccolino Di @lasoncini https://t.co/3hEziLJRGf via @Linkiesta

    407706.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202610x their median

    Una bella amicizia Barletta, Favignana, e altre avventure estive di Soncini con Catiaconlaccì Di @lasoncini https://t.co/3TCGsFL0NW via @Linkiesta

    425314.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20266.6x their median

    Apriti cielo Due caccia italiani hanno intercettato e scortato fuori dallo spazio aereo della Lituania due jet russi https://t.co/ySmen3ywJv via @Linkiesta

    193927.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20265.8x their median

    Operazione Vivaldi L’Ucraina ha rovesciato il piano russo per accerchiare la cintura fortificata del Donbas Di @Alecappelli93 https://t.co/k3pcHELwBA via @Linkiesta

    1611111.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20264.2x their median

    Wordle, Don’t Wordle Il vero privilegio si misura dalle sciocchezze capaci di rovinarci seriamente la giornata Di @lasoncini https://t.co/kXbe7LfJmh via @Linkiesta

    165001.3K viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 20264.0x their median

    INCIVILTÀ DELLE MACCHINE Il nuovo numero di Linkiesta Magazine è dedicato all’accelerazione impetuosa dell’intelligenza artificiale, la più importante questione politica del nostro tempo. Un’indagine su come cambiano la società, il lavoro, la guerra, e il mondo intorno a noi.
Leggi l’editoriale👇 https://t.co/5uZ0L9w3Ts In edicola dal 13 luglio, ma già disponibile qui su Linkiesta Store 🔗 https://t.co/sAl77owsDp

    1171113K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20263.4x their median

    I bambini diventano lettori se gli adulti dimostrano che i libri contano davvero https://t.co/SrEc63yatt via @Linkiesta

    106101.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20262.6x their median

    Un’alleanza tra il Canada e l’Ue sarebbe un punto di riferimento per le democrazie, dice Carney Di @MarkJCarney https://t.co/wRnIJR0iL7 via @Linkiesta

    93011.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#torino

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 301K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 64 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.1K times each, and 0.461% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 64 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 82 interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

What is Linkiesta's engagement rate on X?
Linkiesta (@Linkiesta) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 64 original posts from the last 30 days against 300,764 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, Linkiesta sits below the 10th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Linkiesta have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Linkiesta post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going