Back to @KAVA_CHAIN's profile

Kava engagement report

@KAVA_CHAIN - 279K followers on X

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.163%
of 279K followers
Per impression
0.937%
49K views on a typical post
Reach
17.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
457
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 457 interactions against 279K followers, an engagement rate of 0.163%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 15,823 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 49K times each, and 0.937% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 5% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.0K interactions, about 8.6x its own typical post.

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Kava's engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,823 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.163%, Kava sits above the 50th percentile of the 158,751 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.128% to 0.605%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.605%
p902.32%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 158,751 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,866 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.605%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video5% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 5% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 168 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 18, 20268.6x their median

    BREAKING: πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ The SEC has officially proposed its first ever crypto rulebook. Here are the key points: 1. Projects can raise up to $75 million a year without registering as securities. 2. A separate one time exemption allows up to $5 million over four years. 3. A token stops being a security once the team finishes what it promised to build. 4. State securities rules get overridden for these offerings. 5. Projects still have to disclose key information to investors. The public comment period runs 60 days.

    3.2K52115153168K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20266.7x their median

    LATEST: πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ SEC Chair Paul Atkins told Fox Business the agency has the authority to proceed on crypto rules even if CLARITY fails. https://t.co/hTeMlfAxsz

    2.6K3408627159K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    Stablecoins stopped being a crypto asset. They became payment infrastructure. The chain disappears into the plumbing, and what's left is a dollar that moves in seconds. That's the whole game now.

    5672120050K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    Stablecoin chains aren't a narrative. They're infrastructure. CoinGecko just named "stablechains" a top 2026 crypto trend - a category Kava has been building for years. The market is finally catching up πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

    5572224147K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 2026

    Markets close. Blockchains don't. A 24/7 tokenized-securities venue isn't a crypto gimmick - it's TradFi finally admitting that market hours were always a legacy constraint, not a feature πŸ• The clock was the bug.

    4892023156K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    Before: Cross-border payments took 3–5 days, cost 6% in fees, and required 4 intermediaries. After: One onchain transaction. Seconds. Fractions of a cent. This isn't incremental improvement. It's the destruction of an entire industry ⚑

    4901626050K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    30 million new USDT users in a single quarter. All from emerging markets. The world isn't waiting for TradFi to include them - they're settling in USDT right now. That's the real adoption story 🌍

    4801823032K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026

    how it feels being in stablecoins https://t.co/ZCFs47EHhG

    4812412048K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    The moment it clicks: Elevated rates aren't a headwind for productive onchain capital. They're a tailwind. Tokenized Treasuries. RWA yields. Stablecoin reserves. Higher-for-longer = more yield flowing onchain. πŸ“ˆπŸ”—

    4722119153K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 2026

    Make a wish https://t.co/ijZqs8EwPk

    4671326155K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 457 interactions against 279K followers, an engagement rate of 0.163%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 15,823 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 49K times each, and 0.937% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 5% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.0K interactions, about 8.6x its own typical post.

What is Kava's engagement rate on X?
Kava (@KAVA_CHAIN) has an engagement rate of 0.163%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 279,326 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.163%, Kava sits above the 50th percentile of the 158,751 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @KAVA_CHAIN have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,823 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @KAVA_CHAIN post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going