Jamie Metzl engagement report
@JamieMetzl - 81K followers on X
Measured over 50 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 109 interactions against 81K followers, an engagement rate of 0.136%. Measured over 50 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.9K times each, and 2.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 50 posts sampled, 12% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.
Measured over 50 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Jamie Metzl's engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 71% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.136%, Jamie Metzl sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.128% to 0.604%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 12% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 10% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 12% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 509 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 23, 202611x their median
Let me get this straight: Donald Trump is sucking up to Kim Jong Un, a brutal dictator who runs one of the world’s most repressive regimes, holds tens of thousands of political prisoners, and has supplied Putin with millions of artillery shells, ballistic missiles, and thousands of troops for his war against Ukraine while the president has essentially declared economic war on Canada, one of America’s closest friends and allies. Canada fought beside us in two world wars, Korea, and Afghanistan; sheltered Americans after 9/11; and helps defend our continent every day through NORAD. Our economies are profoundly intertwined, with nearly $3.5 billion in trade crossing our border every day, supporting millions of jobs and deeply integrated supply chains. And beyond all that, Canadians and Americans are bound together by generations of family, friendship, travel, education, sports, music, movies, books, and a vast shared culture. This is nuts. How did America’s friends become our enemies and our enemies become our friends? Every American should reach out to your elected representatives demanding change and reach out to your Canadian friends to express friendship.
- Aug 30, 202611x their median
If Abdul El-Sayed cannot completely, unequivocally, and without reservation condemn Hassan Piker, he will not have earned and does not deserve a single vote. I say this as a loyal Democrat who very much wants our party to take control of one or both houses of Congress in the upcoming election.
- Sep 4, 20269.6x their median
Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed is a toxic candidate not because of his name, ethnicity, or religion, but because of his own bigoted positions and his deeply troubling affiliations with the DSA and anti-American radicals like Hasan Piker. I say this as a Democrat and a lifelong human rights activist.
- Aug 21, 20266.5x their median
I will say it again: The DSA is an anti-American, antisemitic hate group. Patriotic Americans should condemn and ostracize this group just as we should the KKK and the Proud Boys.
- Aug 31, 20266.1x their median
根据历史记录和国际法，中国政府对台湾没有任何合法的主权声索权。
- Aug 21, 20265.4x their median
It gives lifelong, loyal Democrats like me no pleasure to say that the DSA is an anti-American hate group. The Democratic Party should neither accommodate nor caucus with the DSA, but instead unequivocally condemn it and appeal to common-sense Americans who love our country and want to build a better future for everyone.
- Aug 22, 20264.5x their median
If you’re a Democratic voter deeply alarmed by the state of our country and where President Trump is taking us, you should feel enormous urgency to publicly condemn the DSA. The problem isn’t every DSA aspiration. Universal healthcare, for example, is a legitimate policy goal. The problem is that many stated DSA positions—including abolishing police and prisons and dismantling core elements of our constitutional order—are deeply radical, threatening, and unacceptable to most American voters. Failing to draw a bright line between the Democratic Party and the DSA will make it far harder for Democrats to win the elections we desperately need to win. We are already seeing the consequences in Florida, where Angie Nixon has joined the DSA and will certainly lose her Senate race because Republicans will hold her accountable for the DSA platform, as they should. Those of us Democrats who love our country and are deeply concerned about its direction must aggressively counter the DSA and demand that Democratic leaders unequivocally condemn its bigotry, anti-Americanism, and extremism. Democrats cannot support radical candidates like Abdul El-Sayed and Darializa Avila Chevalier without expecting to be held collectively accountable for their positions. If we want to win the support of the majority of American voters who are deeply uncomfortable with the DSA’s dangerous socialist radicalism, we must clearly distance ourselves from these candidates and state loud and clear: that is not us.
- Aug 16, 20264.2x their median
Zohran Mamdani has incessantly and aggressively incited violence against the Jewish community of New York City. The recent attacks are the direct result of the hostile environment he has significantly helped create.
- Aug 19, 20264.0x their median
The victory of DSA bigot Angie Nixon in the Florida Democratic primary all but ensures a republican victory in the November Senate race. For those of us deeply concerned about many of the actions of President Trump and the state of our democracy, having unelectable anti-American DSA extremists representing our party is the ultimate self sabotage.
- Aug 24, 20263.9x their median
Having carefully reviewed the evidence, I believe it is fair to say that, whatever may be in his heart, Mark Ruffalo has repeatedly engaged in antisemitic rhetoric and behavior. He has subjected the world’s only Jewish state to extraordinary moral condemnation; repeatedly described Israel’s actions as “genocide” even after previously apologizing for using that term inaccurately; amplified sensational claims about Gaza that proved false, including the claim that 14,000 babies faced death within 48 hours; and most recently linked Jewish billionaires, media ownership, surveillance technology, Israel, and “genocide” in a way that understandably evokes classic antisemitic tropes. He also appears to apply standards to Israel that he does not apply with remotely comparable intensity to far more repressive or murderous states. The counterargument, which I take seriously but ultimately find insufficient, is that Ruffalo says he is criticizing the policies of a state rather than Jews, and is hardly alone in making extremely serious allegations about Israel’s conduct in Gaza. Criticism of Israel—even fierce criticism—is not inherently antisemitic. The relevant question is whether the same principles are applied consistently. No country should be beyond criticism, certainly not Israel or the United States. But context matters. Israel was attacked on October 7 by Hamas, an organization whose founding charter calls for Israel’s complete destruction. Hamas deliberately built an enormous military tunnel network beneath densely populated Gaza while making clear that those tunnels were for its fighters, not civilians; senior Hamas official Mousa Abu Marzouk explicitly said that civilian protection was the responsibility of the UN and Israel. The UN Secretary-General himself acknowledged that Hamas and other militants deliberately used civilians as human shields. Even this language is not correct. Hamas deliberately used Gazan civilians as human sacrifices. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a terrible tragedy involving immense suffering on both sides, and Israel’s decisions should be scrutinized rigorously. But it becomes antisemitic when the complexity disappears only for the Jewish state: when Hamas’s strategy, ideology, terrorism, hostage-taking, use of civilian infrastructure, and responsibility for initiating the war are erased; when disputed accusations against Israel are presented as uniquely settled facts; when the historical context is disregarded, and when Jewish national self-determination is subjected to standards not demanded of other peoples or states. Equal standards are the minimum requirement for opposing antisemitism while engaging in legitimate criticism. Mark Ruffalo is a terrific actor, and I truly loved him in Poor Things (one of my favorite moves). But Richard Wagner was a great composer, even if he was an awful human being, and mel Gibson was amazing in Gallipoli, even if he suffers from the same ailment as Wagner.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 109 interactions against 81K followers, an engagement rate of 0.136%. Measured over 50 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.9K times each, and 2.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 50 posts sampled, 12% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.
- What is Jamie Metzl's engagement rate on X?
- Jamie Metzl (@JamieMetzl) has an engagement rate of 0.136%, based on the median interactions across 50 original posts from the last 30 days against 81,079 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.136%, Jamie Metzl sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @JamieMetzl have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @JamieMetzl post?
- Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.83 posts per day across the measured window.