Back to @JKash000's profile

JKash šŸŠMAGA Queen engagement report

@JKash000 - 158K followers on X

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.052%
of 158K followers
Per impression
5.06%
1.6K views on a typical post
Reach
1.04%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
83
interactions (median)
Saved
0.061%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.27/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 83 interactions against 158K followers, an engagement rate of 0.052%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.6K times each, and 5.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 62K interactions, about 742x its own typical post.

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

JKash šŸŠMAGA Queen's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 88% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.052%, JKash šŸŠMAGA Queen sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,515 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,515 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,033 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video56% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 226 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 6, 2021742x their median

    Any UK politician who gave Trump the time of day should be ashamed right now.

    48K7.5K3.8K2.0KView on X
  • Jul 26, 2018215x their median

    Here's former President Obama having a reporter removed for interrupting him "in his house" the press claps wildly, even starts chanting Obama's name while the reporter is being removed for yelling "NO MORE DEPORTATIONS" #KaitlanCollins cc: @BretBaier https://t.co/FuAuTEmG1Y

    8.0K6.5K9352.5KView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026154x their median

    TOMORROW IN NEW YORK CITY: 9:55 AM: President Trump delivers remarks to the United Nations General Assembly 10:40Ā AM: President Trump participates in a trilateral signing with the Prime Ministers of Denmark and Greenland 11:45Ā AM: President Trump holds a bilateral meeting with the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain 12:30Ā PM: President Trump holds a bilateral meeting with the Prime Minister of Japan 12:45 PM: The First Lady delivers remarks on expanding Fostering the Future Together 1:15Ā PM: President Trump holds a bilateral meeting with the President of Ukraine 2:15 PM: President Trump participates in a Shield of the Americas event 2:45 PM: President Trump holds a multilateral meeting with the Gulf Cooperation Council 7:15 PM: President Trump participates in an UNGA leaders’ reception 7:40Ā PM: President Trump holds a pull-aside meeting with the Acting President of Venezuela

    10K2.0K443271619K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202696x their median

    Trump is going against almost the whole world to save the whole world. He has earned my respect. 🫔

    7.0K7541793549K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202612x their median

    🚨 LMFAO! Donald Trump is DECIMATING the Fake News for bailing on their "boycott" of covering Trump "By the way, they said they wouldn't be here but they came. I KNEW that would happen. What, are they not gonna be with Xi tomorrow? They said, we will not cover Trump!" 🤣 "When news is fake, and it's dangerous, we have a RIGHT to clear it out." They were NEVER going to refuse coverage of Trump Most of the networks SURVIVE off Trump!

    84414817232K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20266.5x their median

    I hope the entire legacy media puts themselves completely out of business. They are joining together to boycott reporting on all of Trump’s events this week in NY at the UN. Oh well, others who are more truthful will fill their shoes.

    381995093.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20265.1x their median

    Mamdani’s face says all we need to know about how his meeting with Trump went. Mamdani suffered through it because he’s desperate for federal money, and he wants to take advantage of President Trump’s love for his city to get it. Trump isn’t fooled. https://t.co/vIg6gC0zZ6

    288824283.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20263.7x their median

    Trump is instituting an assault on the FAKE NEWS, not the Free Press. The radical left refuses to acknowledge this. https://t.co/BDqlmvewWK

    223631922.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20263.5x their median

    He went there!!!šŸ”„šŸ¤£ https://t.co/TG6HzoNA8W

    222501533.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.8x their median

    Trump describes exactly what will happen if Senate Republicans don’t TERMINATE THE FILIBUSTER. It will be the end of America. https://t.co/ULTPuoqyb3

    144751331.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 83 interactions against 158K followers, an engagement rate of 0.052%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.6K times each, and 5.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 62K interactions, about 742x its own typical post.

What is JKash šŸŠMAGA Queen's engagement rate on X?
JKash šŸŠMAGA Queen (@JKash000) has an engagement rate of 0.052%, based on the median interactions across 41 original posts from the last 30 days against 158,482 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.052%, JKash šŸŠMAGA Queen sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,515 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JKash000 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JKash000 post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going