Back to @JKap415's profile

Jordan Kaplan engagement report

@JKap415 - 276K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.018%
of 276K followers
Per impression
0.366%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
5.04%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
51
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.77/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 51 interactions against 276K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 16,409 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.366% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.05% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 62K interactions, about 1210x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Jordan Kaplan's engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (16,409 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 22% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.018%, Jordan Kaplan sits above the 10th percentile of the 166,665 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.13%
p750.611%
p902.35%
p9982.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 166,665 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,017 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.13%
75th percentile0.611%
90th percentile2.35%
99th percentile82.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video36% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 36% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 120 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 1, 20261210x their median

    Hate to ruin everyone's fun but "vice president at Bank of America " is not the same thing as "vice president of bank of America "

    60K9495262033.1M viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 202613x their median

    Newly declassified documents from the ODNI under Tulsi Gabbard confirm that COVID-19 was man-made and the result of gain-of-function research, contradicting earlier beliefs that it originated naturally.

    18K2.4K340279644K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 2026363x their median

    76ers new starting lineup w/ LeBron next season https://t.co/Slm6HCRfT8

    18K3379883957K viewsView on X
  • Jun 28, 2026135x their median

    Probably gonna get roasted for this for being American, but why doesn’t soccer just implement actual clock stoppages and keep the halves 45 minutes? And just let the team finish their last possession when it’s at the end

    6.4K25423592.6M viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 2026104x their median

    Thinking about the CoD players who have been unfairly given the task of only having ~16 hours to fully recover between their Call of Duty best of 5 matches. Truly fighting God’s toughest battles 🙏🏼

    5.1K95736253K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202694x their median

    Should the CDL have OpTic and FaZe replay Champs in case it was a big fluke?

    4.6K80869250K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 202649x their median

    Slow start for Drake Maye and A.J. Brown through 3+ days of training camp with a ways to go on Day 4. Maye is 1/7 with an INT when targeting Brown in team drills, and his only completion was a wide-open quick out. They're far off on deeper routes.

    2.1K148118167634K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202648x their median

    Real human beings will look at you and tell you this sport is better than the NFL https://t.co/tAocNEyyDm

    2.0K8328339218K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 202634x their median

    3rd place matches should never exist

    1.6K24553112K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 202631x their median

    Omg he faked the crowd cheese for the ring that's so tippable

    1.6K279155K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 51 interactions against 276K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 16,409 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.366% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.05% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 62K interactions, about 1210x its own typical post.

What is Jordan Kaplan's engagement rate on X?
Jordan Kaplan (@JKap415) has an engagement rate of 0.018%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 275,971 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.018%, Jordan Kaplan sits above the 10th percentile of the 166,665 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @JKap415 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (16,409 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @JKap415 post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going