Back to @InvescoUS's profile

Invesco US engagement report

@InvescoUS - 212K followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.001%
of 212K followers
Per impression
0.082%
1.8K views on a typical post
Reach
0.86%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0.027%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.13/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 212K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 0.082% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.863% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 65 interactions, about 16x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Invesco US sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,396 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,396 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,062 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 762 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Dec 15, 202516x their median

    The Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL) is live. Invest in the blockchain built for speed, scale, and the future of finance. Explore QSOL here: https://t.co/WMrIcsPpn0 Get the prospectus here: https://t.co/5exztZzugr https://t.co/qG4rgXZbqM

    5192366K viewsView on X
  • Dec 17, 20256.5x their median

    Has the catalyst for stock diversification arrived? For investors looking to diversify their mega-cap technology exposure, improved growth and lower interest rates may be good reasons. Here are the key takeaways from our weekly market commentary. • Case for diversification: We’re not suggesting the AI trade is over, but we believe the environment is conducive to diversifying within the US markets. • Looking for catalysts: For months, there hasn’t been a catalyst to spark investors to consider diversifying within the US stock market. • Times may be changing: Improved growth and Federal Reserve (Fed) easing could be meaningful developments for investors waiting for a reason to diversify. Read the complete weekly market commentary. https://t.co/BjYH7vwvEI

    66101.2K viewsView on X
  • Jan 13, 20266.0x their median

    Our framework suggests improving global growth. In January, we’re overweighting stocks with a tilt toward cyclicals, value, and small-to-mid caps. Get our timely investment ideas, allocation guidance, and tips to help optimize your portfolios in our monthly playbook ⏰: https://t.co/pj6A9yZ3qj

    6420965 viewsView on X
  • Dec 30, 20254.0x their median

    Throughout 2025, there were clear storylines that captivated our attention: The question of Federal Reserve independence, the dominance of the Magnificent 7, and the trajectory of rates, to name a few. But the numbers don’t always match the narratives. In his final Above the Noise of 2025, Brian Levitt, our Chief Global Market Strategist, focuses on some of these themes. • Investors have been told to worry about Kevin Hassett becoming Federal Reserve (Fed) chair, because he’d be the first to come directly from a senior White House position without prior service as a Fed governor. But the market doesn’t appear particularly concerned about that possibility. • Many assume that the market’s success hinges on the Magnificent 7 stocks, but that narrative doesn’t match the numbers. Five of these stocks lagged the S&P 500 so far this year. Market strength appears far broader than the story suggests. • Will Fed rate cuts cause mortgage rates to fall? Many assume so, but when we compare the historical relationship between the fed funds, US 10-year Treasury, and mortgage rates, the math suggests that mortgages could stay over 6%. Get more in the latest edition of #AbovetheNoise. https://t.co/bfUb8V5gJw

    25101.2K viewsView on X
  • Feb 24, 20263.5x their median

    It’s helpful for investors to remember that for markets, what’s most important isn’t the quantity of news headlines, but whether or not they were expected. ➡️ Tariff decision: Expected. The tariffs that President Trump enacted last year under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) were struck down in a 6-3 ruling by the US Supreme Court on Friday. Was that a shock? Not particularly. Our global market strategists now expect the Office of the US Trade Representative to pivot to a plan B. ➡️ US-Iran: Expected. Tensions have been rising between the US and Iran, but this wasn’t a surprise. These risks have been well-signaled for some time. They don’t expect these developments to derail global stock markets or end the business cycle. ➡️ Economic data: Somewhat unexpected. US gross domestic product (GDP) was weaker than expected, and core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) somewhat hotter. They’d expect inflation to moderate over time, however, as productivity gains from artificial intelligence become more evident. And they don’t believe this changes the trajectory for the Federal Reserve. Read our complete weekly market commentary. https://t.co/nceipSWerl

    33101.2K viewsView on X
  • Dec 16, 20253.5x their median

    Happy holidays from Invesco! May this holiday season bring comfort and joy to you and yours as we look forward to rethinking what's possible together in 2026. https://t.co/mxxQUadQu1

    43001.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.0x their median

    Fed Chair Kevin Warsh’s Jackson Hole speech reinforced our Global Head of Research, Strategy & Insights Ben Jones’ view that rates are likely to stay on hold for the rest of the year. His other takeaways in our weekly market commentary: ▪️ Less forward guidance from the Fed may widen the range of possible outcomes, and has the potential to increase the term premium and push longer-term bond yields higher. ▪️Earnings season ended with positive surprises in many markets, one of the better beat-to-miss ratios the S&P 500 has produced in decades, and double-digit growth in both Europe and Japan. Read our latest weekly market commentary. https://t.co/96X9X9tluP

    41102.3K viewsView on X
  • Jun 17, 20263.0x their median

    The SpaceX IPO was the story investors were watching. The feared “market disruption” didn’t materialize, according to our Chief Global Market Strategist Brian Levitt. The float was too small to meaningfully distort liquidity or sentiment. Whether the valuation makes sense is a stock-specific debate — not a macro signal. The real story, in his view, is still policy: ▪️ Don’t fight the Fed. Volatility is often created by policy uncertainty, and the first rule of central banking is “do no harm.” ▪️ Inflation expectations were relatively contained. Oil prices have been easing. Tightening policy into a strained consumer could risk turning a temporary shock into a policy mistake. That’s why he believes the path of least resistance could still look upward. Read his latest weekly market commentary. https://t.co/uGdLKsesDP

    31201.2K viewsView on X
  • Jun 15, 20263.0x their median

    The first half of the year was marked by immense disruption. However, we believe resilience has endured — and provides a favorable investment environment. Our 2026 Midyear Investment Outlook outlines our expectations for a global economic reacceleration, the path of central bank policy, the impact of artificial intelligence, and much more. Read the full outlook here: https://t.co/gl40WuXONJ

    31201.4K viewsView on X
  • Mar 18, 20263.0x their median

    The Middle East conflict and oil supply disruption are pressuring markets and testing investor confidence. But no one knows how long the conflict will last. Right now, our preferred economic and market indicators, such as credit spreads, inflation expectations, and rate cut assumptions, have become more challenged, but they aren’t flashing clear warning signs yet. We aren’t sugarcoating the current situation, but believe investors should focus on the long-term. Read our latest market commentary. https://t.co/hQtULBg9Tr

    23101.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 212K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 0.082% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.863% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 65 interactions, about 16x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Invesco US's engagement rate on X?
Invesco US (@InvescoUS) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 212,458 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Invesco US sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,396 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @InvescoUS have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @InvescoUS post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going