Back to @Icewear_Vezzo's profile

VEZZO engagement report

@Icewear_Vezzo - 81K followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.287%
of 81K followers
Per impression
3.01%
7.7K views on a typical post
Reach
9.54%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
233
interactions (median)
Saved
0.129%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.07/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 233 interactions against 81K followers, an engagement rate of 0.287%. Posts are seen about 7.7K times each, and 3.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.1K interactions, about 17x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026. Recurring tag: #bigbooger.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.287%, VEZZO sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,282 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.127% to 0.604%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,282 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,969 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 107 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 17, 202517x their median

    FREE SMURK

    2.9K1.1K6735140K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202511x their median

    I’m starting to run out of people to take serious, mainly cause it’s been too long since I’ve seen somebody actually do what they said they would.

    1.7K831114694K viewsView on X
  • Dec 21, 20256.3x their median

    Without the “streets,” I wouldn’t be “street smart,” and without “street smarts” I wouldn’t be a millionaire. I used what I learned in “the streets” in business. I turned my experience from “the streets” into a rap career that helped me support the people thats still in “the streets.” To me, “the streets” is the hood, the ghetto, the people—MY PEOPLE—OUR PEOPLE and not all of them chose to be there. Especially them babies. So, saying “fuck the streets” is saying “fuck them.” The goal is to motivate and inspire them to use their “street sense” for the right reasons and in the right way. Show them it’s other routes outside of the ones we took. We can’t just say “fuck ’em” after they turnt us up. The least we can do is bring knowledge and assistance back to em.

    1.1K22774107185K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20254.0x their median

    NEW ALBUM October 30th! https://t.co/g3GCTpokR0

    757141251522K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20253.2x their median

    Niggaz was playing red Super Mario boots with the skinny jeans tucked last year. I ain’t forget; I know fasure the internet kept tabs.

    493185234631K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20252.9x their median

    Soda was the most turnt Burnt out 🥷🏽 in the hood 😂🤞🏾Long Live Soda❤️ Hit this link https://t.co/ouLLpFScJc for (FULL EPISODE) of #ThisIsNoTaRealPodcast ft #BabyFaceRay Purple Passion (album) October30th!!!! 👿 https://t.co/2MEaxfvqEX

    611558630K viewsView on X
  • May 4, 20252.3x their median

    I genuinely want everyone to win. We got real power, but the only way to activate that power is for us, as a whole, to move as one! ☝🏾 Let’s run dog shit up—it don’t matter what state or city you’re from. OUR thing (pause) is OUR thing (pause). Mfs don’t have to understand it; we do. So, fuckem.

    3721417923K viewsView on X
  • May 8, 20252.1x their median

    Streets ain’t the same ft Warren G out now https://t.co/LGw2wlvSN0 https://t.co/lJzpDkqO8i

    322132103122K viewsView on X
  • Mar 17, 20261.9x their median

    The weather in Detroit been tweakin. You can’t tell me them people not cloud seeding, especially with sky being empty from all the delayed flights. 😤

    33161212322K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20261.5x their median

    Go turn me up hit the link! https://t.co/6iHe1kYHst https://t.co/hPiS3MibVH

    2607710812K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bigbooger

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 233 interactions against 81K followers, an engagement rate of 0.287%. Posts are seen about 7.7K times each, and 3.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.1K interactions, about 17x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is VEZZO's engagement rate on X?
VEZZO (@Icewear_Vezzo) has an engagement rate of 0.287%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 81,221 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.287%, VEZZO sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,282 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Icewear_Vezzo have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Icewear_Vezzo post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going