Back to @IOGroup's profile

Input Output Group engagement report

@IOGroup - 277K followers on X

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.043%
of 277K followers
Per impression
1.35%
8.9K views on a typical post
Reach
3.20%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
120
interactions (median)
Saved
0.023%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.67/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 120 interactions against 277K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.9K times each, and 1.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video, 33% are part of a thread and 59% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 8.6x its own typical post.

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026. Recurring tag: #leios.

Compared with accounts its own size

Input Output Group's engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 54% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.043%, Input Output Group sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,752 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,752 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,056 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video59% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link59% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 59% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 59% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 297 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 2, 20268.6x their median

    We’re excited to share a major update with our community. @realfi_co is coming to Cardano Mainnet on October 1st. That’s right – get ready, make some noise. Thanks to you all, we have a great base to build on. We got here because of you. To date, more than 3,600 users, completing over 40,000 quest actions, took part in the Pioneer Season* – with the public Testnet giving us exactly what a testnet should: Real usage, real comments, and a clear list of what to work on before launch. Thank you. Importantly, the Pioneer Season will continue until Mainnet; this decision is deliberate and not the result of any major issue or setback: We’re taking the additional time to assess what we’ve learned, incorporate community feedback, and ensure our full-blown launch receives the attention, preparation, and polish it deserves. Our goal is simple: To make the transition to Mainnet as strong, smooth, and successful as possible. We will share further launch week details, including what changes for our Pioneers at Mainnet, as October approaches. We are only getting started, The RealFi Team

    751207333855K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20264.0x their median

    AI trading doesn’t have to mean choosing between autonomy and control. With Midnight, Policy Vaults could give AI agents predefined risk limits that are enforced in real time, while ZK proofs make compliance verifiable without exposing proprietary trading strategies. We break down what this could look like for the next generation of autonomous trading: https://t.co/sSonIc5eAq

    3888013521K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20263.6x their median

    The next crypto narrative will not be slightly better yield or slightly more liquidity. It will be technology that stays with people through daily life and makes it simpler, safer and more private. That is how blockchain moves from financial product to consumer infrastructure. https://t.co/kie2pGyQO5

    38044529.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20263.0x their median

    Crypto does not need another slightly better version of what already exists. At @SALTConference Wyoming, @IOHK_Charles argued for a different direction: infrastructure for a world where people begin their day by speaking to an agent. The Dawn of Agentic Finance. https://t.co/8FRvoyxMSg

    2915412414K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20262.8x their median

    From October 1, @MidgardLabsHQ will begin leading Plutus engineering. The transition preserves continuity among engineers who currently maintain and extend the codebase. Midgard Labs has spent years auditing and developing Plutus contracts across Cardano and contributing code, libraries, and standards across the Plutus ecosystem. Built by many. Owned by all. 🧵

    2794313315K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.8x their median

    Leios lifts Cardano's transaction capacity well above today's limit without changing its security model. In its first public test, it peaked at roughly six times what the mainnet handles now. Read about the results of the Earth phase: https://t.co/RNmXbiDhPZ https://t.co/Tq7stnDDTW

    2595612715K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.4x their median

    How important are Peras and Leios in making Cardano more competitive as an L1? @padierfind sits down with @jasonappleton on Block//45 to discuss how these upgrades boost finality and throughput, and touch on @Masumi's work with Hydra. 👇 Catch the full interview below. https://t.co/FItEUnoZd0

    234399312K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20261.8x their median

    Every transaction begins with the same question: can the parties trust each other? Much of the modern economy exists to lower that trust barrier Charles explains why blockchain’s real opportunity is reducing how many intermediaries people need before they can safely do business https://t.co/uQJL09HRwK

    18427309.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20261.7x their median

    In this week’s development report: Hydra 2.4.1 is released – everyone using prior releases is encouraged to upgrade. DevX cardano-init open beta ships, the first Plu-stan stable release is out, and Leios prototype is significantly improved. See the full report for more details: https://t.co/zbdugTTSwP

    16433538.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20261.7x their median

    Charles Hoskinson is live at @SALTConference's Wyoming Blockchain Symposium, exploring The Dawn of Agentic Finance. Watch now: https://t.co/lefY4jlXxd

    169302414K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#leios

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 120 interactions against 277K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.9K times each, and 1.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video, 33% are part of a thread and 59% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.0K interactions, about 8.6x its own typical post.

What is Input Output Group's engagement rate on X?
Input Output Group (@IOGroup) has an engagement rate of 0.043%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 276,534 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.043%, Input Output Group sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,752 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @IOGroup have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @IOGroup post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going