Back to @IMELTSN0WFLAKES's profile

Only The Truth engagement report

@IMELTSN0WFLAKES - 10K followers on X

Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
316.9%
of 10K followers
Per impression
2.56%
1.2M views on a typical post
Reach
12395.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
32K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.067%
836 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.07/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 32K interactions against 10K followers, an engagement rate of 316.9%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 16,409 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 1.2M times each, and 2.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12398.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 193K interactions, about 6.1x its own typical post.

Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Only The Truth's engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (16,409 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 63% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 316.9%, Only The Truth sits above the 99th percentile of the 166,213 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 1% band, which runs 82.5% and above.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.13%
p750.612%
p902.35%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 166,213 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,010 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.13%
75th percentile0.612%
90th percentile2.35%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video67% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link14% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 14% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 155 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 9, 20266.1x their median

    It came y'all... My 1st wig! Tomorrow I test it on the court. This is my feminine era glow up, did I slay? If y'all don't "yassss queen" you're transphobic. I really don't understand all the hatred, I just want to play some hoops with my fellow ladies. 💅🏽 Royce White for U.S. Senate MN 2026 WNBA #LetHerPlay

    164K17K9.8K2.5K7.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20264.3x their median

    DiJonai Carrington for clotheslining Sophie Cunningham then posting "white privilege" while appropriating white culture with fake ass straight blonde hair. Retard of the day 🥇 https://t.co/bpUAgxSPgo

    118K15K3.4K713951K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20263.6x their median

    You REDUCE crime by eliminating POVERTY. The reason so called nice neighborhoods have lower crime rates is because people’s basic needs are being met. It is not because of police, alarm systems, or neighborhood associations. Poverty creates crime.

    87K19K6.4K9994.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20262.3x their median

    Hey @grok Is the writer of this article Jewish? https://t.co/aF9hKSncfY

    64K5.3K1.6K6152.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.1x their median

    They opened a KFC in Africa and it goes exactly how you think it would. I’m not even making this up. https://t.co/TxbkiWY118

    55K7.9K3.7K1.2K3.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20262.1x their median

    Pit bulls were responsible for 78% of all fatal dog attacks in 2025. 8% of dogs in the US are pit bulls.

    60K4.0K3.3K5532.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.0x their median

    The mentality of White Liberals. https://t.co/07jFxYo9Ka

    54K9.4K4643931.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20261.8x their median

    Bitches be like “if women ruled the world there wouldn’t be any violence” then murder their unborn child.

    52K3.8K29397624K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20261.7x their median

    It really is incredible that there’s just outright racial violence happening in the WNBA. Every men’s professional sports league has black and white players and they aren’t having these problems. Remember this the next time a feminist tells you women should rule the world because they’re more peaceful and empathetic or whatever.

    50K4.5K925154903K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20261.6x their median

    That debate was basically unwatchable. But what is truly striking is how Charlie Kirk has become a background character in the endless soap opera about his own murder. The story now revolves around the raging narcissist Candace Owens and the mass psychosis she has induced.

    45K2.5K3.0K2362.4M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 32K interactions against 10K followers, an engagement rate of 316.9%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 16,409 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 1.2M times each, and 2.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12398.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 193K interactions, about 6.1x its own typical post.

What is Only The Truth's engagement rate on X?
Only The Truth (@IMELTSN0WFLAKES) has an engagement rate of 316.9%, based on the median interactions across 21 original posts from the last 30 days against 10,019 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 316.9%, Only The Truth sits above the 99th percentile of the 166,213 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @IMELTSN0WFLAKES have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (16,409 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @IMELTSN0WFLAKES post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going