Back to @IBVMCHAIN's profile

IBVM engagement report

@IBVMCHAIN - 87K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.203%
of 87K followers
Per impression
2.04%
8.0K views on a typical post
Reach
9.92%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
163
interactions (median)
Saved
0.05%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.87/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 163 interactions against 87K followers, an engagement rate of 0.203%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.0K times each, and 2.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 39% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ai, #bitcoin, #ethereum.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 6, 2026. Recurring tags: #ai, #bitcoin, #ethereum.

Compared with accounts its own size

IBVM's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 62% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.203%, IBVM sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,148 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.127% to 0.604%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,148 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,016 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video96% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link39% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 96% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 39% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 389 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 26, 202612x their median

    Hello IBVM Community! We're giving away 300 IBVM Tokens from our airdrop pool 🚀 🏆 6 Lucky Winners 🎁 50 IBVM Tokens Each To enter: ✅ Follow @IBVMCHAIN ❤️ Like + Repost this post 💬 Comment your IBVM Wallet Address below 🎲 Winners will be selected randomly. ⏰ Giveaway ends in 48 hours. Winners will be announced in our Telegram community. Good luck, everyone! 🔥

    7975616121138K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20266.1x their median

    🚨 SOMETHING BIG IS COMING… 👀🔥 We’ll let you guess which exchange moves first. ⚡ 🌍 $IBVM is getting ready for the global stage. But the real question is… WHO WILL ANNOUNCE IBVM FIRST? 👀👇 🔶 Binance 🟢 MEXC 🔵 KuCoin 🟡 Coinbase ⚫ Kraken 🔷 Bybit Drop your prediction below. 👇 Which exchange will be FIRST? 🌐 https://t.co/5cFkhZ888B

    71288185431K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20263.2x their median

    🚀 IBVM Launches Its Enterprise Multi-Signature Wallet ahead of its CEX listings. Built for enterprises, institutions, funds and DAOs, the IBVM Enterprise Multi-Sig Wallet enables secure digital asset management through multiple authorized signatories and configurable transaction approvals. 🔐 Enterprise-grade security 🏦 Multi-signatory treasury management ✅ Configurable approval workflows 🤝 Shared institutional asset control ⚡ Native to the IBVM Mainnet Secure infrastructure for the next generation of institutional digital finance. https://t.co/8mesLMVWIO #IBVM #Enterprise #Multisig #Bitcoin #InstitutionalFinance #Web3

    4454634338K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20262.3x their median

    BlackRock, JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs manage $20 trillion. This month they quietly started trading assets as tokens on a blockchain. Last time finance had a moment like this, shipping costs fell 97% and global trade exploded 800%. The ocean is free. The money is at the ports. 🧵👇 $IBVM #BTC #BlockchainAdoption #Web3

    35216729.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.3x their median

    Our thoughts are with Nepal. 🇳🇵 In times of hardship, borders disappear. Communities come together. Humanity comes first. IBVM stands with the people of Nepal and everyone affected by this devastating disaster. Stay safe. Stay strong. 🇳🇵 IBVM — A Global Community. https://t.co/Yjdy4ZpGug

    342151705.4K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 20262.3x their median

    🎉 Exciting news for the IBVM community! We're proud to share that IBVM Technologies has received the 2026 Global Recognition Award for Innovation 🏆 This award recognizes our mission to make Bitcoin more scalable, energy-efficient, and accessible through no-code token creation for both humans and AI. Thank you to our incredible community for being part of this journey—this achievement belongs to all of us! 🚀 Learn more: 🌐 https://t.co/Pu5hhOCzri 🌐 https://t.co/M1CbAxZRbD

    2077387570K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.1x their median

    Everyone knows Bitcoin’s 51% attack. But what if I told you some Proof-of-Stake networks can face serious disruption at just 33%? 👀 Here’s the part most people misunderstand 👇 ⛏️ Bitcoin / PoW An attacker generally needs majority hashpower to reliably reorganise the chain or double-spend. 🔐 BFT-style PoS Around ⅓ of validating stake can be enough to disrupt finality in certain designs by preventing the required supermajority. But… 33% ≠ control. There’s a huge difference between stopping a blockchain and corrupting its history. That’s why “decentralised” isn’t enough when evaluating security. The better question is: How much coordinated power does it take to STOP the network and how much to CORRUPT it? That distinction matters. #Bitcoin #Ethereum #PoW #PoS #Blockchain @IBVMCHAIN

    32512508.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.1x their median

    Scaling Bitcoin without scaling the energy footprint. 🌱⚡ https://t.co/5erO9RJssa

    31020805.0K viewsView on X
  • Jun 13, 20261.7x their median

    IBVM Builder Campaign is on 🔥 Got a killer crypto idea? 🚀 IBVM is giving FREE MARKETING to the best projects Worth $100,000 built on IBVM Chain. 🔥 How to Enter 👇 1️⃣ Launch your project on IBVM T-Minter 🔗 https://t.co/QonQa4Yjdp 2️⃣ Like + Repost this post ❤️ 3️⃣ Drop your project name + screenshot/mockup in the comments 📸 🏆 Winners will be selected by: ⚡ IBVM Team 🗳️ Community Votes We're looking for: 🔥 Meme Coins 🤖 AI Projects 🛠️ Utility Tools 🌐 New Communities 💡 Creative Experiments Build on IBVM. Launch fast. Get noticed. Your project could be the next one featured by IBVM. 🚀 #IBVM #Tminter #BuildOnIBVM #Web3 #Crypto #AI #Blockchain #DeFi

    177643825.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20261.6x their median

    IBVM INVESTOR UPDATE A special milestone for everyone who believed in IBVM from the beginning. 🟠 We’re excited to announce that all IBVM investors will receive 10% unlock of their invested token allocation within the next 48 hours. This comes as IBVM has been approved for listing by one of the top global cryptocurrency exchanges. 🌎 While the exact listing date remains undisclosed for now, we wanted our investors to be among the first to benefit as IBVM moves closer to this major milestone. 10% presale Investor Unlock ⏱️ Within 48 Hours 🚀 Top Global Exchange Listing Approved This is our way of recognizing the investors who backed IBVM early and believed in the vision. The countdown has begun. More details. More milestones. More IBVM. 🟠 #IBVM #Bitcoin #BitcoinLayer2 #Web3 #Crypto #IBVMToken

    1874434015K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ai#bitcoin#ethereum#ibvm#solana

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 163 interactions against 87K followers, an engagement rate of 0.203%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.0K times each, and 2.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 39% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 12x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ai, #bitcoin, #ethereum.

What is IBVM's engagement rate on X?
IBVM (@IBVMCHAIN) has an engagement rate of 0.203%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 86,525 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.203%, IBVM sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,148 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @IBVMCHAIN have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @IBVMCHAIN post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going