Back to @George_Ambangil's profile

George Ambangile engagement report

@George_Ambangil - 937K followers on X

Measured over 67 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.065%
of 937K followers
Per impression
2.52%
24K views on a typical post
Reach
2.57%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
607
interactions (median)
Saved
0.025%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.6/day
active 87% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 607 interactions against 937K followers, an engagement rate of 0.065%. Measured over 67 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 2.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 67 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78K interactions, about 128x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #arsenal, #goat, #ucl.

Measured over 67 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026. Recurring tags: #arsenal, #goat, #ucl.

Compared with accounts its own size

George Ambangile's engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 75% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.065%, George Ambangile sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,102 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,052 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video30% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link1% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 30% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 1% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 274 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 9, 2026128x their median

    2025/26 UCL Player of the Season: Khvicha Kvaratskhelia ๐Ÿ† #UCL https://t.co/wWs2NDjSiu

    73K4.1K1931761.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 202685x their median

    ๐‹๐ˆ๐•๐„๐‘๐๐Ž๐Ž๐‹'๐’ ๐๐„๐– ๐–๐€๐‹๐‹ ๐Ÿงฑ๐Ÿšง Good luck scoring against this ๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ ๐Ÿ—ผ 1.91m (6 ft 3) Ronald Araรบjo ๐Ÿ—ผ 1.95m (6 ft 5) Virgil van Dijk https://t.co/O87hanZewZ

    48K2.1K9391.1K2.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 202676x their median

    No amount of low spending will save you. If the money isn't constant, you'll still go broke.

    37K7.8K506334518K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 202663x their median

    Mason Mount vs Atletico Madrid https://t.co/77eYWY7ctN

    33K3.3K4961.6K7.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 202647x their median

    S3x is a sin, masturbร tion is a sin. So what do we do when we are hรฒrny ๐Ÿ˜Ÿ

    23K1.3K2.7K8222.6M viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 202635x their median

    ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Andoni Iraola: "If you analyse in swimming, boxing, track and field, Spain donโ€™t normally win medals. But in collective sports they are VERY good. In football, basketball, handball, hockey, normally they have good teams. We always put the team first." "An example is someone like Rodri. He didnโ€™t score or make an assist but at the end they won the World Cup and he won best player of the tournament. Team-first was always integrated in how we were raised." (@guardian_sport)

    20K1.1K197101949K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202635x their median

    ๐Ÿšจ ๐—ข๐—™๐—™๐—œ๐—–๐—œ๐—”๐—Ÿ: This yearโ€™s edition of the Ballon d'Or will have a strong focus on impact in BIG GAMES, it is confirmed to be one the KEY factors. โœจ๐Ÿ‘€ https://t.co/5ziWfxzXVj

    18K1.0K9561.2K2.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202632x their median

    Last time chelsea won at these stadiums: Man U (old trafford) - 2013 Man city (etihad) - 2021 Liverpool (anfield) - 2021 Arsenal (emirates) - 2021 Now check when last this teams won at Stamford bridge ๐Ÿ’”and yes, itโ€™s that bad ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿฟโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿฟโ€โ™‚๏ธ

    18K1.5K201157785K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202616x their median

    how do you even begin to mark this๐Ÿ˜ญ https://t.co/GH1J3tn87b

    8.7K57984295560K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202616x their median

    ๐Ÿšจ ๐—ก๐—˜๐—ช: Atlรฉtico Madrid have put Alexander Sรธrloth on the transfer market. The club are demanding a fee of โ‚ฌ40M. โ€”ย @MatteMoretto https://t.co/m6EAifrUn6

    8.7K291307120284K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#arsenal#goat#ucl

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 607 interactions against 937K followers, an engagement rate of 0.065%. Measured over 67 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 2.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 67 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78K interactions, about 128x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #arsenal, #goat, #ucl.

What is George Ambangile's engagement rate on X?
George Ambangile (@George_Ambangil) has an engagement rate of 0.065%, based on the median interactions across 67 original posts from the last 30 days against 936,934 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.065%, George Ambangile sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,102 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @George_Ambangil have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @George_Ambangil post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going