PlayerSells
Back to @Felipinhosouza's profile

π…π„π‹πˆππˆππ‡πŽπ˜šπ˜°π˜Άπ˜»π˜’ engagement report

@Felipinhosouza - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.535%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
5.01%
161K views on a typical post
Reach
10.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
1.32%
2.1K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.2/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 8.1K interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.535%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 161K times each, and 5.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 419K interactions, about 52x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

π…π„π‹πˆππˆππ‡πŽπ˜šπ˜°π˜Άπ˜»π˜’'s engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 93% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.535%, π…π„π‹πˆππˆππ‡πŽπ˜šπ˜°π˜Άπ˜»π˜’ sits above the 75th percentile of the 10,326 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.321% to 2.48%.

p100.001%
p250.007%
p50 (median)0.048%
p750.321%
p902.48%
p99354.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 10,326 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 442,521 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.007%
50th percentile0.048%
75th percentile0.321%
90th percentile2.48%
99th percentile354.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link19% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length--7%-8% to -5%9.0K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 19% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 86 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 7% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 4, 202352x their median

    Straight friends have sex for the first time https://t.co/nV56TDdJfM

    334K83K1.9K39249M viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20266.2x their median

    All yours https://t.co/WcNbGEndSt

    45K5.2K12414788K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20264.9x their median

    Sit here https://t.co/lQlLcrBGlQ

    35K3.5K28921413K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20264.5x their median

    Dois bundudos de respeito πŸ‘ sendo versΓ‘teis ❀️‍πŸ”₯ https://t.co/Wde0XYCjNu

    32K3.8K9616791K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20264.1x their median

    damn bro, that’s heavy πŸ₯΅πŸ˜ˆ full vid on: https://t.co/yjIK0zW53s https://t.co/KUJuUSYn0x

    29K3.3K18222649K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 20262.3x their median

    Wataa πŸ† https://t.co/N4Lo8mYoO4

    16K1.9K14714365K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20261.9x their median

    Olha a grossura do pau do salva-vidas, ele colocou pra fora do short e me mostrou o tamanho do seu pranchΓ£o https://t.co/0KWruey1kI

    13K1.7K407262K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20261.8x their median

    Novin PIROCUDO do Rio acabou com o meu rabo πŸ† WATAA πŸ‘ https://t.co/5EDpx6uduX

    12K2.2K1026255K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20261.5x their median

    O que tu faria se me visse assim na sua frente? https://t.co/GDa7ZREBQ0

    11K1.0K195119K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    After the gym you see him in the locker room stroking his BBC Wyd ? πŸ†πŸ† https://t.co/olBX8lSrbd

    8.8K718473181K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8.1K interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.535%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 161K times each, and 5.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 419K interactions, about 52x its own typical post.

What is π…π„π‹πˆππˆππ‡πŽπ˜šπ˜°π˜Άπ˜»π˜’'s engagement rate on X?
π…π„π‹πˆππˆππ‡πŽπ˜šπ˜°π˜Άπ˜»π˜’ (@Felipinhosouza) has an engagement rate of 0.535%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,505,004 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.535%, π…π„π‹πˆππˆππ‡πŽπ˜šπ˜°π˜Άπ˜»π˜’ sits above the 75th percentile of the 10,326 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Felipinhosouza have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Felipinhosouza post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going